Extended abstract
Introduction
Geostrategy is a type of foreign policy that is mainly driven by geographical factors. Unlike geopolitics, which explains the current situation based on geographical factors, geostrategy is based on geographical features that can be discussed as spatial relationships and dependencies, in defining and guiding the country's foreign policy, a more comprehensive and accurate worldview to advance the country's goals in different regions and achieve a superior position or win-win situation against other competitors. The goal of geostrategy is to reach the highest and most stable level of national interests in the opposite dimensions. In the framework of this perspective, the main question of the research is, from a geostrategic point of view, what capacities are there in Iran's neighborhood relations with Azerbaijan to advance a successful strategy for Iran against other competitors? It is assumed that in order to gain the real position of its neighbor in the region, along with deepening its relations with its other neighbors (especially Armenia), in order to deepen its relations with Azerbaijan, Iran takes advantage of certain geostrategic capacities and relationships, which are discussed in this research.
Methodology
This article has a qualitative nature and approach and using the descriptive-analytic method expounds the geostrategic opportunities of Azerbaijan in terms of geographical features for Iran's more effective and bolder role in the South Caucasus. Also, this article explains Azerbaijan's geostrategic opportunities for Iran in the South Caucasus. On the one hand, the results of the research show that Azerbaijan, in different dimensions of its geographic scope and topography, demographic characteristics and cultural commonalities, historical commonalities and the size of the economic market, has brought wide geostrategic opportunities for the influence and powerful role of Iran in the region and beyond. On the other hand, the research results point to Iran's most bitter experience in the region. This means that despite the available opportunities, Iran cannot use them for various reasons and somehow leaves the field for the powerful influence of its competitors.
Results
According to the results of this research, Azerbaijan can be considered as the most geographical and economic gateway and trade-communication bottleneck of Iran with the South Caucasus and various surrounding markets. However, this does not mean negating the geostrategic importance of Armenia's communication geography, especially from the point of view of competing with Iran's rivals. As Azerbaijan and Turkey strive to diversify their communication corridors, Iran's economic and commercial interests in the region require to pursue both paths. However, without changing the situation in Azerbaijan-Armenia relations, we cannot hope much about the effectiveness of the Armenian path. However, as the past experience of Iran's political-economic relations with Azerbaijan shows, Iran should not waste more this opportunity.
Conclusions
One of the biggest problems that the relations of the parties suffer from is the lack of mutual trust. In this context, considering that Azerbaijan is a smaller power and Iran is considered a dominant and larger power, building trust and trying to attract Azerbaijan should be prioritized by Iran. Otherwise, as in the current situation, Azerbaijan will move more and more towards rival countries and enemies of Iran (such as Israel) (a trend that has recently been observed by Armenia), which adds to the complexity of the situation. When Iran cannot (due to geopolitical and ideological considerations) fill the vacuum of power and influence in its neighborhood with all its geo-strategic relations and in a special position from Azerbaijan's neighborhood, rival countries and especially the enemy will make the most of such an opportunity to achieve their goals. They will win their strategy. In general, according to the results of this research, with a geostrategic turn in foreign policy, it is possible to largely build mutual trust in the relations of the parties, as well as overcome political, geopolitical, ideological concerns, and in this situation a major transformation in the influence and role of Iran in South Caucasus and Azerbaijan will be possible. |
References
- Abbasi, M; Mousavi, S.M.R (2012). "Iran-Azerbaijan Relations, Convergence Platforms and Divergence Areas," Central Eurasia Studies, 6, 8: 80-61, at: https://jcep.ut.ac.ir/article_36771.html. [In Persian]
- Abbaszadeh Fathabadi, M; Moinabadi Bidgoli, H; Dost Hosseini, M (2021). "Structural Analysis of the turn in Iran's Foreign Policy against the Nagorno-Karabakh Crisis (2020)."Central Eurasian Studies, 2, 14: 246-225, doi: 10.22059/jcep.2022.318774.449983. [In Persian]
- Aiqarlu, M (2019). "The Opportunity to revive the Jolfa Railway Line to Connect Iran to Europe," Bandar and Darya Magazine, 283 and 284, 36 and 37: 43-42, at: https://www.magiran.com/p2215773. [In Persian]
- Amir Ahmadian, B (2019). "Armenia and Nakhchivan Corridor will never be Established", Bandar and Darya Monthly, 283 and 284, 36 and 37: 31-28, at: https://www.magiran.com/p2215757. [In Persian]
- Amir Ahmadian, B (2024). "Development of Cooperation between Iran and the Republic of Azerbaijan," Iranian Diplomacy, at: http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/fa/news/2026348 (June 25, 1403). [In Persian]
- Amir Ahmadian, B; and others (2016). "Analysis of Iran-Armenia relations using the theoretical framework of defensive realism," Central Eurasia Studies, 9, 1: 41-19, at: https://jcep.ut.ac.ir/article_58572.html. [In Persian]
- Bahman, Sh (2021). "Iran is the biggest loser of the South Caucasus," Faraz Daily, at: https://www.faraz.ir/fa/news/48733 (20 Shahrivar 1403). [In Persian]
- Bayramov, Avaz. (1998) Foreign Economic Relations, Baku: Xalq Gazetesi.
- Brzezinski, Zbigniew. (1986) Game Plan: A Geostrategic Framework for the Conduct of the U.S.–Soviet Contest, Boston: The Atlantic Monthly Press.
- Center for Strategic and International Studies. "Brzezinski Institute on Geostrategy," Available at: https://www.csis.org/programs/brzezinski-institute-geostrategy (Accessed 10 July 2024).
- Chabaki, O (2008). "Challenges of relations between Iran and Azerbaijan," Central Eurasia Studies, 2, 4: 84-63, at: https://jcep.ut.ac.ir/article_20463.html. [In Persian]
- hedia, Anri R. (2024) "Zangezur Corridor: Economic Potential and Political Constraints. Russia in Global Affairs," 22, 1: 194–216, <DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2024-22-1-194-216>.
- Fathulahi, A (2023). "Study of Erdoğan's Goals Regarding the Proposed Crossing of the Zangez-Zor Corridor through Iranian Territory," Iranian Diplomacy, at: http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/fa/news/2022058 (27 May 1403). [In Persian]
- Garafano, John. (2004) "Alternate Security Strategies: The Strategic Feasibility of Various Notions of Security," International Peace Research Foundation, Available at: http://www.afes-press.de/pdf/ pdf.
- Gawliczek, Piotr; Iskandarov, Khayal. (2023) "The Zangezur corridor as part of the global transport route (against the backdrop of power games in the South Caucasus region)," Security and Defence Quarterly, 41, 1: 36–53, <https://doi: 10.35467/sdq/161993>.
- Gholizadeh, S.E; Kafash Jamshid, M.R (2013). "Opportunities and Challenges of Deepening Iran in the Republic of Azerbaijan," Defense Policy, 22, 86: 172-139, at: https://dpj.ihu.ac.ir/article_203196.html. [In Persian]
- Ghorchi, M (2019). "Linking Competitors in a Network Economy," Bandar and Darya Monthly, 283 and 284, 36 and 37: 42-40, at: https://www.magiran.com/p2215773. [In Persian]
- Gray, Colin S. & Geoffrey, Sloan. (1999) Geopolitics, Geography and Strategy, London and Portland, Oregon: Frank Cass.
- Grygiel, Jakub J. (2006) Great Powers and Geopolitical Change. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Gül, Cengiz. (2007) "Investment in Azerbaijan is Advantageous", Ekonomık Forum.
- Gyorgy, Andrew. (1943) "The Geopolitics of War: Total War and Geostrategy". Politics. 5, 4: 347–362, <https://doi.org/10.2307/2125293>
- Iskandarov, Khayal et al. (2024) "Violation of territorial integrity as a tool for waging long-term hybrid warfare (against the backdrop of power games in the South Caucasus region)," Security and Defence Quarterly, 45, 1: 1-17, <https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/174507>.
- Jajani, M; Sanai, A; Khabeiri, K (2021). "Construction and Validation of Iran-Azerbaijan Foreign Relations model and extraction of Risk-taking, Critical, Strategic and Regulatory Variables," Central Eurasia Studies, 14, 2: 173-151, doi: 10.22059/jcep.2022.326128.450013. [In Persian]
- Javadi Arjamand, M.J; Kikhosro Dolatyari, Y (2017). "Geopolitical Analysis of Iran-Armenia Relations in the Framework of Anderson's Theory and the Plan of a Regional Convergence after the Normalization of Relations between Armenia and Turkey," Geopolitic, 8, 26: 223-192, in: https://www .sid.ir/paper/115986. [In Persian]
- Joo-Jock, Lim. (1979) Geo-Strategy and the South China Sea Basin. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
- Kaplan, Yusuf. (2020) "Türkiye, dış politikadaki atağı, jeo-kültürel derinliğini harekete geçirebilmesine borçlu," Available at: https://www.yenisafak.com/yazarlar/yusuf-kaplan/turkiye-dis-politikadaki-atagi-jeo-kulturel-derinligini-harekete-gecirebilmesine-borclu-2055461.
- Kolaeei, E; Osoli, Gh. (2017). "How the Security Relations between Iran and the Republic of Azerbaijan Change," Central Eurasia Studies, 5, 11: 94-57, at: https://www.sid.ir/paper/151285. [In Persian]
- Konuralp, Erhan. (2022) "Zengzur Koridorunun Bölgesel Kalkınma ve Ekonomik Büyüme Statejik Önemi Çalıştay Raporu," Serhat Kalkınma Ajansi.
- Kozegar Koleji, V (2021). A Reflection on the Legal and Executive Challenges and Ambiguities of the Ninth Paragraph of the Karabagh Ceasefire Agreement," Iranian Diplomacy, at: http://www.irdiplomacy. ir/fa/news/2002585 (June 25, 1403). [In Persian]
- Kozegar Koleji, V (2022). "Strategic Railway Connection: Time to Reconnect Iran and the South Caucasus," Iran and Eurasia Studies Institute, at: https://B2n.ir/j53727 (June 25, 1403). [In Persian]
- Lacoste, Y. (1997) "Géopolitique, économie et nation," Géoéconomie, 50, pp. 39-44, Available at: https://shs.cairn.info/revue-geoeconomie-2009-3-page-39?lang=fr
- Luttwak, E. N. (1990) "From Geopolitics to Geo-economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce," The National Interest, 20, pp. 17–23, Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42894676.
- Mokhtari, H (2019). "Gains and losses of Regional Countries from the Nakhchivan Corridor," Bandar and Darya Monthly, 283 and 284, 36 and 37: 49-48, at: https://www.magiran.com/p2215776. [In Persian]
- Mousavi, S. M.R; Toti, H.A (2017). "Israeli Relations with the South Caucasus and its Impact on the National Security of the Islamic Republic of Iran," Aran, 11, 30-31: https://www.sid.ir/paper/499790/fa. [In Persian]
- Naseri, A; Shakuri, A (2024). "Iran and the Geopolitics of the Zangezor Corridor," Studies of Central Asia and the Caucasus, 30, 125: 94-55, at http://ca.ipisjournals.ir/article_714199.html. [In Persian]
- Pakaein, M (2021). "In what way does Zangzor Corridor Threaten Iran's Interests?" Khabaronline, at: https://www.khabaronline.ir/news/1579150 (June 25, 1403). [In Persian]
- Rogers, James; Simón, Luis. (2010) "Think Again: European Geostrategy," Available at: http://europeangeostrategy.ideasoneurope. eu/2010/03/14/think-again-european-geostrategy.
- Schuman, Frederick L. (1942) "Let Us Learn Our Geopolitics," Current History. 2, 9: 161–165, Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/
- Shamsini Ghiathvand, H; Farhand, M.B (2016). "Investigation of Relations between Iran and Azerbaijan; Challenges and Opportunities," Studies of National Interests, 3, 9: 55-27, at: https://www. ir/ article _65227.html. [In Persian]
- Sören, Schilvin. (2019) "Geo-economics and geopolitics in sub-Saharan African power," In Mikael Wigell et al, eds. Geo-economics and Power Politics in the 21st Century, New York: Routledge.
- STRATEGIECS Team. (2021), "Geostrategy in 21st Century," Available at: https://strategiecs.com/en/analyses/geostrategy-in-21st-century (Accessed 8 July 2024).
- Valigholizadeh, A (2011). "Economic Importance of the Republic of Azerbaijan in the development of the Aras Free Zone", Studies of Central Asia and the Caucasus, 73: 111-134, at: https://www.noormags. ir/ view/fa/articlepage/847784. [In Persian]
- Valigholizadeh, A (2014). "Explaining the Geo-economic Importance of the South Caucasus for the Economic Promotion of the Aras Free Zone," Geopolitics, 11, 37: 156-135, in: https://journal.iag.ir/article_55838.html. [In Persian]
- Valigholizadeh, A (2014). "Spatial-Geoeconomic Survey and Analysis of Iran's Business Relations with CIS," Central Eurasia Studies, 8, 2: 364-343, at: https://jcep.ut.ac.ir/article_56857.html. [In Persian]
- Valigholizadeh, A. (2011). Pathology of relations between Iran and Azerbaijan. Tehran: Tehran Institute of Contemporary Abrar Studies. [In Persian]
- Veliyev, Cavid. (2021) "Building the Zangezur corridor, normalization in South Caucasus," Available at: https://www.dailysabah.com/ opinion/ op-ed/building-the-zangezur-corridor-normalization-in-south-caucasus (Accessed 10 July 2024).
- Website of the President of Russia. (2020) "Заявление Президента Азербайджанской Республики, Премьер-министра Республики Армения и Президента Российской Федерации (Document: Full text of the agreement between the leaders of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan)," Available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/ news/ 64384 (Accessed 8 July 2024).
- World Bank, wits.worldbank.org, (Accessed 2 July 2024).
|
