پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,470 |
| تعداد مقالات | 69,914 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 122,492,584 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 95,720,877 |
Coping Competencies of Iranian Students in E-Learning: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation | ||
| Journal of Information Technology Management | ||
| دوره 16، شماره 4، 2024، صفحه 122-141 اصل مقاله (1.32 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jitm.2024.377662.3704 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mahboobeh Moosivand* 1؛ Samaneh Rashtbar2؛ Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh3 | ||
| 1Department of Social Science and Development Studies, Women Research Center, Al Zahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Women Research Center, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Women and Family Studies Research Center, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The study evaluated the opportunities and challenges of e-learning for university students and investigated their experiences. A sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach (quantitative and qualitative) was used. In the quantitative phase, a survey was conducted to explore students' competencies in coping with e-learning attributes, involving 237 university students (46.9% male, 53.1% female). Descriptive and analytical tests were used to analyze the data. The results indicated the mean scores of students' perspectives on the opportunities and challenges of e-learning in university were 4.05 ± 0.49 out of 5. In the qualitative phase, data were collected through semi-structured interviews. To provide a richer context and better understanding and interpretation of the quantitative findings, the current research employed qualitative research methodologies, including focus group discussions with ten interviewees—five academic staff members and five students. Combining both student and academic staff perspectives provides a more comprehensive understanding of the research topic. Students and staff may have different viewpoints, experiences, and needs related to the subject matter. The qualitative analysis identified five significant themes: communication defects, technical challenges, personal-level challenges, curricular-level issues, and social challenges. The study's findings may be utilized to design better policies and strategies to enhance e-learning and address its issues among both instructors and students. Finally, the study provides implications for relevant stakeholders | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Academic Staff؛ Coping Competencies؛ E-Learning؛ University Students | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abduljabbar, J. (2021). Mixed Method: Investigation of Flow in E-Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic from Students’ and Teachers’ Perspectives [PhD Thesis, Concordia University Chicago].
Adler, R. H. (2022). Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research. Journal of Human Lactation, 38(4), 598–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344221116620
Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Ghazal, S. (2019). How course, contextual, and technological challenges are associated with instructors’ challenges to successfully implement E-learning: A developing country perspective. IEEE Access, 7, 48792–48806.
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86.
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5261–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
Andersson, A., & Grönlund, Å. (2009). A Conceptual Framework for E‐Learning in Developing Countries: A Critical Review of Research Challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 38(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2009.tb00271.x
Ardiyanto, J., Handayani, O. W. K., Raharjo, T. J., & Pujiastuti, R. S. E. (2021). Does Learning Motivation Essential? Examining Readiness on Self-Directed Learning and Technology towards Cognitive Presence. 7(1), 788–792. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/ISET/article/view/2046
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis. Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 128–47.
Chelliq, I., Anoir, L., Erradi, M., & Khaldi, M. (2023). Transition from Face-to-Face to E-Learning and Pedagogical Model. In Emerging Trends and Historical Perspectives Surrounding Digital Transformation in Education: Achieving Open and Blended Learning Environments (pp. 52–77). IGI Global.
Cochran, W. G. (1977). The estimation of sample size. Sampling Techniques, 3, 72–90.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Elumalai, K. V., Sankar, J. P., Kalaichelvi, R., John, J. A., Menon, N., Alqahtani, M. S. M., & Abumelha, M. A. (2021). Factors affecting the quality of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of higher education students. In COVID-19 and Education: Learning and Teaching in a Pandemic-Constrained Environment (Vol. 189). Santa Rosa, CA.
Fülöp, M. T., Breaz, T. O., Topor, I. D., Ionescu, C. A., & Dragolea, L.-L. (2023). Challenges and perceptions of e-learning for educational sustainability in the “new normality era.” Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1104633.
Islam, N., Beer, M., & Slack, F. (2015). E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 102–112.
Kamysbayeva, A., Koryakov, A., Garnova, N., Glushkov, S., & Klimenkova, S. (2021). E-learning challenge studying the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(7), 1492–1503.
Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2022). Exploring connections in the online learning environment: Student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(10), 1794–1808.
Kee, C. L. (2020). Face-to-Face Tutorial, Learning Management System and WhatsApp Group: How Digital Immigrants Interact and Engage in E-Learning?. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 18–35.
Khan, B. H., Affouneh, S., Hussein Salha, S., & Najee Khlaif, Z. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities for the Global Implementation of E-learning Frameworks. IGI Global.
Koh, J. H. L., & Kan, R. Y. P. (2021). Students’ use of learning management systems and desired e-learning experiences: Are they ready for next generation digital learning environments? Higher Education Research & Development, 40(5), 995–1010.
Lin, Y., & Nguyen, H. (2021). International students’ perspectives on e-learning during COVID-19 in higher education in Australia: A study of an Asian student. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 19(4), 241–251.
Maatuk, A. M., Elberkawi, E. K., Aljawarneh, S., Rashaideh, H., & Alharbi, H. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: Challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1), 21–38.
Marinucci, M., Pancani, L., Aureli, N., & Riva, P. (2022). Online social connections as surrogates of face-to-face interactions: A longitudinal study under Covid-19 isolation. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107102.
Mehrpouyan, A. (2023). Enhancing online English language and literature classrooms: Effective and practical teaching strategies. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4127–4141.
Milićević, V., Denić, N., Milićević, Z., Arsić, L., Spasić-Stojković, M., Petković, D., Stojanović, J., Krkic, M., Milovančević, N. S., & Jovanović, A. (2021). E-learning perspectives in higher education institutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120618.
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11–25.
Nouraey, P., Bavali, M., & Behjat, F. (2023). E-Learning in the Context of English Language Teaching and Learning: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Approach. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 12(4), 55–73.
Ratnawati, N., & Idris, I. (2020). Improving student capabilities through research-based learning innovation on e-learning system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(4), 195–205.
Shahmoradi, L., Changizi, V., Mehraeen, E., Bashiri, A., Jannat, B., & Hosseini, M. (2018). The challenges of E-learning system: Higher educational institutions perspective. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 7, 1–6.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (2014). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
Tabatabaei, S. H., Mirzaiean, A., & Keshmiri, F. (2022). Opportunities and threats of e-learning in dental education in viewpoints of faculty members: A Mixed method study. Dental Research Journal, 19, 1–12.
Tomczyk, Ł., Potyrała, K., Włoch, A., Wnęk-Gozdek, J., & Demeshkant, N. (2020). Evaluation of the functionality of a new e-learning platform vs. Previous experiences in e-learning and the self-assessment of own digital literacy. Sustainability, 12(23), 10219.
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have Higher Education Institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6401–6419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w
Wu, L., Hsieh, P.-J., & Wu, S.-M. (2022). Developing effective e-learning environments through e-learning use mediating technology affordance and constructivist learning aspects for performance impacts: Moderator of learner involvement. The Internet and Higher Education, 55, 100871.
Young, L. E., & Paterson, B. L. (2007). Teaching nursing: Developing a student-centered learning environment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Zanin, M., Xiao, C., Liang, T., Ling, S., Zhao, F., Huang, Z., Lin, F., Lin, X., Jiang, Z., & Wong, S.-S. (2020). The public health response to the COVID-19 outbreak in mainland China: A narrative review. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 12(8), 4434–4449.
Zarei, S., & Mohammadi, S. (2022). Challenges of higher education related to e-learning in developing countries during COVID-19 spread: A review of the perspectives of students, instructors, policymakers, and ICT experts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(57), 85562–85568.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 51 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 89 |
||