پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 162 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,623 |
| تعداد مقالات | 71,544 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 126,895,300 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 99,942,590 |
ارزیابی نظریه حق به شهر از منظر جنسیت برای دستیابی به فضای شهری همه‌شمول جنسیتی (موردپژوهی: شهر رشت) | ||
| زن در توسعه و سیاست | ||
| دوره 22، شماره 4، دی 1403، صفحه 843-865 اصل مقاله (545.72 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jwdp.2024.379162.1008463 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهرناز مولوی1؛ وحید فیض خواه* 2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ معماری و هنر، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ معماری و هنر، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| عدالت، مفهومی فراگیر و جهان‌شمول است که همواره به‌عنوان یکی از مؤلفه‌های اساسی توسعه مورد توجه بوده است. این مفهوم در نگاه حوزه‌های متنوع علمی و پژوهشی می‌تواند تفاسیر متفاوتی داشته باشد. نظریۀ حق‌به‌شهر هانری لوفور که بر پایۀ مفهوم عدالت است، یکی از مهم‌ترین نظریه‌ها دربارۀ مفهوم عدالت در برنامه‌ریزی و طراحی شهری به‌شمار می‌رود. از سوی دیگر مفهومی به نام «شهر همه‌شمول جنسیتی» رویکردی است که به‌دلیل توجه به حقوق زنان در دسترسی به امتیازات و منافع موجود در شهرها و وجود پدیده‌ای به نام جنسیتی‌شدن فضا، طی سالیان اخیر توجه بسیاری از پژوهشگران برنامه‌ریزی و طراحی شهری را به خود جلب کرده است. این پژوهش با مرور نظریۀ حق‌به‌شهر و بررسی مبانی مرتبط و مشابه، با استفاده از روش کیفی تحلیل تماتیک و کدگذاری باز، مؤلفه‌های اصلی دستیابی به شهر همه‌شمول جنسیتی را در شهر رشت جستجو می‌کند. در این راستا ابتدا در مرحلۀ کدگذاری به ده مضمون محوری رسیدیم که با دسته‌بندی آن‌ها می‌توان گفت چهار مؤلفۀ اصلی دستیابی به فضای همه‌شمول جنسیتی در شهر رشت، امنیت، ویژگی‌های اجتماعی فضا، ویژگی‌های محیطی فضا و فرهنگ برابری جنسیتی را شامل می‌شوند. در پایان نیز پیشنهاداتی در جهت دستیابی به فضای شهری همه‌شمول جنسیتی در شهر رشت ارائه شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| حق به شهر؛ فضای جنسیتی شده؛ شهر همه‌شمول جنسیتی؛ رشت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Assessing the Right to the City Theory from a Gender-Wise Perspective in order to Achieve Gender Inclusive Urban Space (Case Study: The City of Rasht) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mehrnaz Molavi1؛ Vahid Feizkhah2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of Urban Planning and Design, Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Art, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. | ||
| 2PhD Student in Urban Planning, Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Art, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Justice is an inclusive and universal concept that has consistently been considered as a fundamental element of development. This concept may be interpreted differently from the standpoint of a variety of scientific and research fields. One of the most widely recognized theories regarding the concept of justice in urban planning and design is Henri Lefebvre's theory of the right to the city, which is predicated on the concept of justice. On the other hand, a concept called "gender inclusive city" is an approach that has attracted the attention of many urban planning and design researchers in recent years due to the attention given to women's rights in accessing privileges and benefits in cities and the emergence of a phenomenon called the "gendered space." This research endeavors to identify the primary elements of a gender-inclusive city in Rasht by examining the theory of the right to the city and employing the qualitative method of open coding and thematic analysis. In this regard, the current research has identified ten central themes in the coding stage. By categorizing them, it can be concluded that the four main components of establishing a gender-inclusive space in the city of Rasht are security, social and environmental features of the space, and the culture of gender equality. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| The Right to The City, Gendered Space, Gender Inclusive City, The City of Rasht | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aitken, S. C. (2005). The geographies of young people: the morally contested spaces of identity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203995747 Althorpe, C., & Horak, M. (2023). The end of the right to the city: A radical-cooperative view. Urban Affairs Review, 59(1), 14-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815 Asian Development Bank (2013). Gender Toolkit: Maximizing the Benefits of Improved Mobility for All. https://doi.org/10.22617/tcs210028-2 Bayat, B. (2016). Islamic approach to the city: Characteristics of the Islamic city. Journal of Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers, 4(1), 137-167. https://doi.org/10.22059/jstmt.2014.57079 (In Persian) Begum, J. (2001). Women, environment and sustainable development, making the links. Journal of Women and Environment, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4935-x Blum, V., & Nast, H. (1996). Where's the difference? The heterosexualization of alterity in Henri Lefebvre and Jacques Lacan. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(5), 559-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d140559 Fanni, Z., & Ahmadi, L. (2020). Women and the Quest for the Right to the City in Gendered Footpaths (Case Study: District 6, Tehran Municipality). Social Development, 15(1), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.22055/QJSD.2020.16735 (In Persian) Fenster, T. (2006). The Right to the City and Gendered Everyday Life1. Cities for All, 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09589230500264109 Friendly, A. (2013). The right to the city: theory and practice in Brazil. Planning Theory & Practice, 14(2), 158-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2013.783098 Habibi, M., & Alipoor Shojaei, F. (2015). A comparative study of women-specific public spaces with urban public spaces in terms of responsiveness to women's needs: Case study: Ab O Atash Park and Mothers’ Paradise Park in Tehran. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urbanism, 20(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2015.56368 (In Persian) Haji Ahmadi Hamadani, A., Majedi, H., & Jahanshahloo, L. (2018). Evaluation criteria affecting the activity of women in urban areas, Case study: 20th Golestan Dist, poonak, Tehran. Journal of Urban Studies, 4(14), 47-60. (In Persian) Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939-941. Harvey, D. (2008). “The right to the city”, The City Reader, 6, 23-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.03091317.2003.00492.x Hayden, D. (1980). What would a non-sexist city be like? Speculations on housing, urban design, and human work. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(S3), S170-S187. https://doi.org/10.1086/495718 Izady, M., Mohammadi, J., Taheri, Z., & Shirkhani, H. (1996). Exploring the desirability of urban public spaces from the perspective of women (Case study: Region 4 of Isfahan Municipality). Journal of Geography and Development, 14(42), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2016.2347 (In Persian) Johnson, A. M., & Miles, R. (2014). toward more inclusive public spaces:Learning from the everyday experiences of Muslim Arab women in New York City. Journal of Environment and Planning A, 46(8), 1892–1907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a46292 Lefebvre, H. (1967). The Right to the City, In Writings on Cities, ed. Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas. London: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350041707 Lipman, P. (2013). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. Taylor & Francis. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203821800 Marcuse, P. (2012). Whose right (s) to what city?. In Cities for people, not for profit (pp. 24-41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.15299/local.2012.11.2.371 Massey, D. (1994). Place, space and gender. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. https://doi.org/10.2307/4065933 Mousavi, M. S., & Zahedian, A. (2013). Factors Affecting Women's Social Interactions in Urban Spaces: A Case Study: Shahriyar Pedestrians in Vali Asr Neighborhood, Tabriz City. Journal of Women and Family Studies, 6(21), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.30495/jwsf.954929.6.21.7 (In Persian) Naqdi, A., & Darabi, S. (2014). Women's Access to Urban Spaces: A Case Study of Women in Ilam City. Woman in Culture and Art, 6(4), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.22059/jwica.2014.56020 (In Persian) Noorani, S., Noorani, F., & Pourmohammadi, M. R. (2012). Women-Friendly City: A Case Study of Ardebil City Center. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 5(19), 165-181. (In Persian) Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f Rahbari, L., & Sharaepoor, M. (2014). Gender and the Right to the City: Examining Lefebvre's Theory in Tehran. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 15(1), 116-141. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17351901.1393.15.1.5.2 (In Persian) Sandberg, L. (2011). Fear of violence and gendered power relations: Responses to threat in public space in Sweden. Doctoral dissertation, Kulturgeografiska Institutionen, Umeå Unversitet. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360903420178 Shokohfar, F., Davodpour, Z., & Bigdeli Rad, V. (2023). Right To the City and Sexual Differences Challenges (Case Study: Qazvin City). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 17(4), 977-989. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25385968.1401.17.4.20.6 (In Persian) Sweet, E. L., & Ortiz Escalante, S. (2014). Bringing bodies into planning: Visceral ethods, fear and gender violence. Journal of Urban Studies, 52, 1826–1845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042098014541157 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 253 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 205 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب