پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,573 |
| تعداد مقالات | 71,036 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 125,507,285 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 98,771,053 |
دادگاه صالح و قانون حاکم در دعاوی علیه شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی | ||
| بررسی‌های مدیریت رسانه | ||
| دوره 3، شماره 3، 1403، صفحه 422-442 اصل مقاله (353.47 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/mmr.2024.385824.1136 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| سمیرا سلیمان زاده* | ||
| استادیار، گروه تجارت بین‌الملل، دانشکده تجارت و بازرگانی، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی از انواع رسانه محسوب می‌شوند. منظور از رسانه، هرگونه وسیلۀ مادی یا غیر مادی در بستر کاغذی یا الکترونیکی در فضای حقیقی یا برای نشر و اعلان اطلاعات است که می‌تواند دارای مجوز یا فاقد مجوز باشد. به نظر می‌رسد اقتضای ذات هرگونه فعالیت رسانه‌ای، علنی بودن، قابلیت دسترسی و وصف اثرگذاری در مقیاس وسیع است. اهمیت این موضوع با توجه به افزایش انکارناپذیر اثرگذاری فعالیت‌های رسانه‌ای در بُعد فراملی، بسیار زیاد است. موضوع پژوهش حاضر، در کشورهای خارجی نظیر ایالات متحده آمریکا و کشورهای عضو اتحادیه اروپا سابقه بررسی دارد؛ اما در حقوق ایران، امری نوین محسوب می‌شود. روش: این مقاله با روش تحلیلی نگارش شده است. ابتدا داده‌ها از نظام‌های مختلف حقوقی جمع‌آوری شده و با نظام حقوقی ایران مقایسه و بررسی و از جنبۀ حقوقی تحلیل و تفسیر شده است؛ سپس این اطلاعات برای استفاده وارد مقاله شده است. یافته‌ها: در این مقاله مهم‌ترین یافته این است که تاکنون نظام‌های بزرگ حقوقی، مثل اتحادیه اروپا و ایالات متحده، قوانین خاصی برای صلاحیت و نحوۀ انتخاب قانون در دعاوی فراملی مجازی تصویب نکرده‌اند. رویه قضایی این کشورها نیز نشان می‌دهد که اصول تعارض صلاحیت دادگاه‌ها و تعارض قوانین در این دعاوی و دعاوی غیرمجازی، واحد است. در ایران نیز تاکنون از همین رویکرد پیروی شده است. نتیجه‌گیری: در فرض طرح دعوا علیه شرکت‌های مالک شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی، باید تفکیک قائل شد. اگر قراردادی بین زیان‌دیده و مالک شبکۀ اجتماعی وجود داشته باشد، دادگاه صالح و قانون حاکم، تابع نظام قراردادی خواهد بود؛ اما فرضی که قراردادی نباشد با توجه به اینکه اقتضای ذات فعالیت رسانه‌ای، گردش آزاد اطلاعات است، فرض محکومیت شرکت‌های مالک این شبکه‌ها، بسیار بعید به نظر می‌رسد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اینترنت؛ فضای مجازی؛ شبکۀ اجتماعی؛ تعارض قوانین؛ صلاحیت دادگاه‌ها؛ احکام بین‌المللی؛ عنصر خارجی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Jurisdiction and the Applicable Law in Litigations against Social Virtual Networks | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| samira soleymanzadeh | ||
| Assistant Prof., Department of International Trade, Faculty of Commence and Trade, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective Virtual social networks are considered a type of media. Media refer to any material or immaterial means on paper or electronic media in real space or for publishing and announcing information, which can be licensed or unlicensed. It seems that the essence of any media activity is publicity, accessibility, and the ability to have a large-scale impact. Media, as a necessary and inevitable social phenomenon, can have its own legal challenges in any form. To solve these challenges, legal solutions must be sought at both legislative and judicial levels. The importance of this issue is very high, given the undeniable increase in the impact of media activities in the transnational dimension. This is because, due to the entry of a foreign element, multiple legal systems are involved in solving this problem. Any legal system that is affected by transnational media activity has a claim to address that issue through its courts and laws. An area that is the subject of discussion is the principles of conflict of laws and conflict of courts. Virtual social networks are considered one of the types of media and can be examined from the perspective of media law and its considerations. An important point in this regard is the impossibility of determining the concept of borders and, consequently, cross-border activity in the context of virtual social media. Because borders in their physical and classical sense do not make sense in cyberspace, and crossing borders is not a material phenomenon. In addition, the method of cross-border activity is examined in terms of impact rather than being justified in terms of the place of occurrence of the act. Although the subject of the present study has a history of study in foreign countries such as the United States of America and European Union member states, it is considered a new matter in Iranian law. Perhaps the reason for the long history of discussion in the mentioned countries is that the use of virtual social networks has a longer history in their countries and is considered a relatively new matter in the Iranian legal system. On the other hand, the issue of filtering and perhaps the lack of recognition of the aforementioned networks at different times in Iranian law has caused the legal challenges arising from these communications to be hidden and perhaps the legal solutions to them to be blurred. Although in Iran, a court of law entitled Culture and Media has been allocated in proportion to the subject matter of these challenges, there is no accessible judicial practice from the opinions of the courts that have examined the decisions issued in this court. Also, in civil lawsuits that are directly filed in the courts, reliable judicial practice has not been produced. The Electronic Commerce Law approved in 2003 attempted to identify electronic platforms and their rights and duties, but it does not provide a solution regarding the vitality and the extensive ability to announce information through the aforementioned platforms. Perhaps at the time that the law was approved, the legal challenges arising from virtual social networks had not yet emerged. In addition, the Computer Crimes Law approved in 2009 has created a suitable platform for criminally dealing with those activities that are criminal and are committed through computers. The Islamic Penal Code approved in 2013, considering the punishment for legal entities and the possibility of attributing the crime in some cases to the managers of the legal entity, can be used in this regard. Research Methodology This article is written using an analytical method, in such a way that first the data from different legal systems are collected, compared and examined with the Iranian legal system, subjected to legal analysis and interpretation, and then entered into this article. Findings The most important finding of this article is that so far, major legal systems such as the European Union and the United States have not adopted specific rules for jurisdiction and the method of choosing the law in virtual transnational lawsuits. Also, the judicial practice of these countries shows that the principles of conflict of jurisdiction of courts and conflict of laws in these lawsuits and other lawsuits that are not of a comparative nature are the same. The same approach has been followed in Iran so far. Discussion & Conclusion When it comes to filing a lawsuit against virtual social networks, the first issue that comes to mind is filing a lawsuit against the companies that own such networks. Besides, the important question here, is the extent of the duties of social network owners towards citizens and governments for disclosing user information, which is a two-faced issue. On the one hand, these platforms are obliged to protect the privacy and personal information of users, and on the other hand, since they have the power to influence the sovereignty of countries through the conscious circulation of information, they have obligations towards them. It seems that whenever the aforementioned networks can reach an agreement with the governments on this issue, they are considered to be infringers in terms of omission, but otherwise, there is no obligation in this regard. Assuming that there is a contract, the competent court and the governing law will be subject to the contractual requirements, but assuming that there is no contract, the assumption of condemnation of the companies that own these networks seems very unlikely. Regarding the governing law, assuming that there is a contract, the law governing the contract is the criterion of action, which can be determined by the free will of the parties. Assuming that there is no contract, the law governing non-contractual obligations is the criterion of action, which can be the law of the place of the harmful act, the law of the place where the damage occurred, and the law that is most relevant to the dispute. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Internet, Virtual space, Social network, Legal rules, Jurisdiction of courts, International rulings, Foreign element | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
جباری، مصطفی (1378). «فتوا» یا «قانون»، نگاهی به اصل 167 قانون اساسی. فصلنامه حقوق، 38(3)، 127- 137.
سلیمان زاده، سمیرا (1401). گروه شرکت‌های تجاری، دادگاه صالح و قانون حاکم (چاپ دوم)، تهران، شرکت سهامی انتشار.
صادقی، حسین؛ اسماعیلی، عباس و قاسمی، علیرضا (1400). مسئولیت مدنی دولت در فضای سایبر با نگاهی به آموزههای اخلاق سایبری. فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، 16(1)، 1-8.
صفایی، سید حسین (1391). فواید عمومی قراردادها (چاپ سیزدهم)، تهران، نشر میزان.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1386). اعمال حقوقی (چاپ دوازدهم)، تهران، شرکت سهامی انتشار.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1387). قانون مدنی در نظم حقوقی کنونی (چاپ هجدهم)، تهران، انتشارات میزان.
مافی، همایون و ادبی فیروزجایی، رشید (1393). صلاحیت دادگاه های ایران در قلمرو حقوق بین‌الملل خصوصی، دو فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی دانش حقوق مدنی، 3(2)، 48- 63.
ملکوتی، رسول و ساورایی، پرویز (1395). درآمدی بر مسئولیت مدنی در فضای سایبر. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های حقوق خصوصی، 4(15)، 129-149.
نهرینی، فریدون (1396). آیین دادرسی مدنی، جلد اول، مراجع قضایی و غیرقضایی و حدود صلاحیت آن‌ها، تهران، انتشارات گنج دانش.
References American Law Institute. Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws. 1971 & 187 (1) (2). Available at: https://goo.gl/iKA- ZCE. Access 15/01/2024 Elefant, C. (2011). The power of social media: legal issues & best practices for utilities engaging social media, The Energy Law Journal, )32(, 1. Grimmelmann, J. (2015). The law and ethics of experiments on social media users, Colo. Tech. LJ, 13, 219. Jabbari, M. (1999). "Fatwa" or "Law", a look at Article 167 of the Constitution. Law Quarterly, 38(3), 127-137. (in Persian) Jimenez, W. G. (2015). Rules for offline and online in determining internet jurisdiction. Global overview and Colombian cases. International Law, (26), 13-62. Katouzian, N. (2007). Legal Acts (12th edition), Tehran, Sahami Publishing Company. Katouzian, N. (2008). Civil law in the current legal order (18th edition), Tehran, Mizan Publishing Company. (in Persian) Lambert, K. M., Barry, P. & Stokes, G. (2012). Risk management and legal issues with the use of social media in the healthcare setting. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 31(4), 41-47. Lipschultz, J. H. (2024). Social media communication: Concepts, practices, data, law and ethics. Routledge. Mafi, H. & Adabi Firuzjaei, R. (2014). Jurisdiction of Iranian courts in the field of private international law. Two Quarterly Scientific Research Journals of Civil Law, 3(2), 48-63. (in Persian) Malkouti, R. & Savaraei, P. (2016). An introduction to civil liability in cyberspace. Quarterly Journal of Private Law Research, 4(15), 129-149. (in Persian) Nahrini, F. (2017). Civil Procedure, volume one, judicial and non-judicial authorities and their jurisdiction, Tehran, Ganj Danesh Publications. (in Persian) Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I). OJ L 177, 4.7.2008. Available at: http://bit.ly/2vPJSX7. Accessed in: 12/13/2016. Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contrac- tual obligations (Rome II). OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p. 40–49. Available at: http://bit.ly/2uF9aZa. Accessed in: 12/13/2016. Sadeghi, H., Esmaeili, A. & Ghasemi, A. (2000). Civil responsibility of the state in cyberspace with a look at the teachings of cyber ethics. Ethics Quarterly in Science and Technology, 16(1), 1-8. (in Persian) Safaei, S.H. (2012). Public benefits of contracts (13th edition), Tehran, Mizan Publishing Company. (in Persian) Sarikakis, K. & Winter, L., (2017). Social media users, legal consciousness about privacy, Social Media and Society, 3, 1. Soleimanzadeh, S. (2001). Group of commercial companies, the righteous court and the governing law (2th edition), Tehran, Sahami Publishing Company. (in Persian) Stein, A. R. (2003). Personal Jurisdiction and the Internet: Seeing Due Process Through the Lens of Regulatory Precision. Northwestern University Law Review, 98, 41-415. Wang, F.F. (2010). Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law: Legal Practices in the EU, US and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 45 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 37 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب