پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 162 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,694 |
| تعداد مقالات | 72,265 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 129,312,766 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 102,172,104 |
تحلیل قضاوت‌های مرزی ذی‌نفعان در حوزۀ انرژی با رویکرد جامعۀ 0/5: ادراکات انتقادی سیستم در مورد مطالعاتی شرکت گاز | ||
| فصلنامه سیستم های انرژی پایدار | ||
| دوره 4، شماره 2، فروردین 1404، صفحه 213-231 اصل مقاله (1.32 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ses.2025.388245.1111 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمدرضا فتحی* 1؛ سید محمد محمودی2؛ ابوالفضل خسروی1؛ وحید اعتمادی3 | ||
| 1دانشیار، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استاد، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با گذر زمان، نقش انرژی در توسعۀ اقتصادی، رفاه اجتماعی و حفظ محیط زیست به طور چشمگیری افزایش یافته است. افزایش مصرف انرژی و محدودیت منابع تجدیدناپذیر، جوامع را با چالش‌های بی‌سابقه‌ای روبه‌رو کرده که نیازمند راهبردهای نوآورانه و سیاست‌های کارآمد برای مدیریت انرژی است. بحران جهانی انرژی، ناشی از ترکیبی از عوامل سیاسی، اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی، کشورها را به استفاده از منابع جایگزین و بهینه‌سازی مصرف انرژی سوق داده است. در این میان، ایران با وجود ذخایر عظیم انرژی، با شدیدترین بحران انرژی در چهار دهۀ اخیر مواجه است. کاهش دما و افزایش تقاضا در فصل‌های سرد سال، نه‌تنها اقتصاد و بازار انرژی کشور را تحت تأثیر قرار داده، بلکه به بروز انتقادهای اجتماعی منجر شده است. هدف اصلی این پژوهش، ارائۀ راهکارهایی برای بهبود سیاست‌های انرژی با تأکید بر بحران گاز و با مشارکت ذی‌نفعان است. در این پژوهش، از رویکردی انتقادی (رهایی‌بخش) تحت عنوان «ابتکارات سیستم‌های انتقادی (CSH)» استفاده شده است. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده از مطالعۀ موردی شرکت گاز نشان‌دهندۀ گپ‌های چشمگیر میان وضعیت فعلی و حالت ایده‌آل سیستم است. جهان‌بینی کنونی عمدتاً بر توسعۀ حداکثری انرژی‌های فسیلی تمرکز دارد، در حالی که جهان‌بینی ایده‌آل بر تأمین انرژی پاک و پایدار، استفاده از فناوری‌های نوین و تخصص‌های چندبعدی مانند هوش مصنوعی، داده‌کاوی و مدیریت استراتژیک تأکید می‌کند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ادراک انتقادی سیستم (CSH)؛ بحران انرژی و گاز؛ جامعه 5.0؛ پایداری زیست محیطی؛ تحلیل ذی نفعان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analyzing the Boundary Judgments of Stakeholders in the field of Energy with the Approach of Society 5.0: Critical Systems Heuristics in the case of Gas Company | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Reza Fathi1؛ Seyed Mohammad Mahmoudi2؛ Abolfazl Khosravi1؛ Vahid Etemadi3 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3PhD Student, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Over time, the role of energy in economic development, social welfare, and environmental sustainability has significantly increased. Rising energy consumption and the limitations of non-renewable resources have presented societies with unprecedented challenges, requiring innovative strategies and efficient policies for energy management. The global energy crisis, driven by a combination of political, economic, and environmental factors, has pushed countries toward the use of alternative resources and optimization of energy consumption. In this context, despite Iran’s vast energy reserves, the country faces the most severe energy crisis in the last four decades. The decrease in temperature and the increase in demand during the colder seasons have not only impacted the country’s economy and energy market but also led to social criticism. The primary objective of this study is to provide solutions to improve energy policies, with a focus on the gas crisis and the involvement of stakeholders. This research employs a critical (emancipatory) approach called Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH). The results obtained from the case study of the gas company indicate significant gaps between the current state and the ideal state of the system. The current worldview primarily focuses on the maximal development of fossil energies, while the ideal worldview emphasizes the provision of clean and sustainable energy, the use of modern technologies, and multidisciplinary expertise, such as artificial intelligence, data mining, and strategic management. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Critical systems heuristics (CSH), Energy and Gas Crisis, Society 5.0, Environmental Sustainability, Stakeholder Analysis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] A. Taghipour, A. Sohrabi, M. Ghaedi, and M. Khazaei, "A robust vaccine supply chain model in pandemics: Case of Covid-19 in Iran," Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 183, p. 109465 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109465, 2023.
[2] P. Z. Foukolaei, F. A. Asari, M. Khazaei, F. Gholian-Jouybari, and M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, "From responsible sourcing of wastes to sustainable energy consumption in the blue hydrogen supply chain: Case of nearshoring in Nuevo Leon," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 77, pp. 1387-1400, 2024.
[3] M. Ghaedi, P. Z. Foukolaei, F. A. Asari, M. Khazaei, F. Gholian-Jouybari, and M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, "Pricing electricity from blue hydrogen to mitigate the energy rebound effect: A case study in agriculture and livestock," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 84, pp. 993-1003, 2024.
[4] S. E. Hosseini, "Transition away from fossil fuels toward renewables: lessons from Russia-Ukraine crisis," Future Energy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2-5, 2022.
[5] M. Ramezani, M. Khazaei, F. Gholian-Jouybari, A. Sandoval-Correa, H. Bonakdari, and M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, "Turquoise hydrogen and waste optimization: A Bi-objective closed-loop and sustainable supply chain model for a case in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 195, p. 114329 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114329, 2024.
[6] Y. Popkostova, "Europe’s energy crisis conundrum," European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2022.
[7] A. Taghipour, P. Z. Foukolaei, M. Ghaedi, and M. Khazaei, "Sustainable Multi-Objective Models for Waste-to-Energy and Waste Separation Site Selection," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 22, p. 15764 https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215764, 2023.
[8] S. Singh, "Energy crisis and climate change: Global concerns and their solutions," Energy: crises, challenges and solutions, pp. 1-17, 2021.
[9] I. Von Homeyer, S. Oberthür, and C. Dupont, "Implementing the European Green Deal during the Evolving Energy Crisis," Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 60, 2022.
[10] L. A. Lambert et al., "The EU's natural gas Cold War and diversification challenges," Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 43, p. 100934, 2022.
[11] H. Heidari, M. Akbari, A. Souhankar, and R. Hafezi, "Review of global energy trends towards 2040 and recommendations for Iran oil and gas sector," International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 8007-8018, 2022.
[12] A. Taghipour, A. Padash, V. Etemadi, M. Khazaei, and S. Ebrahimi, "Sustainable and Circular Hotels and the Water–Food–Energy Nexus: Integration of Agrivoltaics, Hydropower, Solar Cells, Water Reservoirs, and Green Roofs," Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 1985 https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051985, 2024.
[13] S. L. Zilberberg, "The Water Crisis in Iran: Heightening Instability," A Multidisciplinary Journal on National Security, p. 41.
[14] M. Ehsanifar, F. Dekamini, C. Spulbar, R. Birau, M. Khazaei, and I. C. Bărbăcioru, "A Sustainable Pattern of Waste Management and Energy Efficiency in Smart Homes Using the Internet of Things (IoT)," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 5081 https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065081, 2023.
[15] A. Deguchi et al., "What is society 5.0," Society, vol. 5, no. 0, pp. 1-24, 2020.
[16] A. Adel and N. H. Alani, "Human-Centric Collaboration and Industry 5.0 Framework in Smart Cities and Communities: Fostering Sustainable Development Goals 3, 4, 9, and 11 in Society 5.0," Smart Cities, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 1723, 2024.
[17] M. Ghobakhloo, M. Iranmanesh, M. Fathi, A. Rejeb, B. Foroughi, and D. Nikbin, "Beyond Industry 4.0: a systematic review of Industry 5.0 technologies and implications for social, environmental and economic sustainability," Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2024.
[18] M. Fukuyama, "Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society," Japan Spotlight, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 47-50, 2018.
[19] S. Huang, B. Wang, X. Li, P. Zheng, D. Mourtzis, and L. Wang, "Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution," Journal of manufacturing systems, vol. 64, pp. 424-428, 2022.
[20] K. Fukuda, "Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0," International journal of production economics, vol. 220, p. 107460, 2020.
[21] E. G. Carayannis and J. Morawska-Jancelewicz, "The futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 3445-3471, 2022.
[22] M. Tayebi, A. Bemani, A. Fetanat, and M. Fehresti-Sani, "A decision support system for sustainability prioritization of air pollution control technologies in energy and carbon management: Oil & gas industry of Iran," Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 99, p. 104416, 2022.
[23] D. Pamučar, M. Behzad, D. Božanić, and M. Behzad, "Decision making to support sustainable energy policies corresponding to agriculture sector: Case study in Iran’s Caspian Sea coastline," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 292, p. 125302, 2021.
[24] R. Zahedi, A. Zahedi, and A. Ahmadi, "Strategic study for renewable energy policy, optimizations and sustainability in Iran," Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 2418, 2022.
[25] M. Jamali, S. Soufizadeh, B. Yeganeh, and Y. Emam, "A comparative study of irrigation techniques for energy flow and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in wheat agroecosystems under contrasting environments in south of Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 139, p. 110704, 2021.
[26] V. M. Taghvaee, A. A. Arani, S. Soretz, and L. Agheli, "Comparing energy efficiency and price policy from a sustainable development perspective: Using fossil fuel demand elasticities in Iran," MRS Energy & Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 480-493, 2022.
[27] Y. Noorollahi, H. Lund, S. Nielsen, and J. Z. Thellufsen, "Energy transition in petroleum rich nations: Case study of Iran," Smart Energy, vol. 3, p. 100026, 2021.
[28] S. Solaymani, "A review on energy and renewable energy policies in Iran," Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 13, p. 7328, 2021.
[29] R. A. Estévez, V. Espinoza, R. D. Ponce Oliva, F. Vásquez-Lavín, and S. Gelcich, "Multi-criteria decision analysis for renewable energies: research trends, gaps and the challenge of improving participation," Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 3515, 2021.
[30] M. Wahlund and J. Palm, "The role of energy democracy and energy citizenship for participatory energy transitions: A comprehensive review," Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 87, p. 102482, 2022.
[31] E. Galende-Sánchez and A. H. Sorman, "From consultation toward co-production in science and policy: A critical systematic review of participatory climate and energy initiatives," Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 73, p. 101907, 2021.
[32] Y. Zhou and P. D. Lund, "Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities─ trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration," Renewable Energy, vol. 207, pp. 177-193, 2023.
[33] D. Stober, M. Suškevičs, S. Eiter, S. Müller, S. Martinát, and M. Buchecker, "What is the quality of participatory renewable energy planning in Europe? A comparative analysis of innovative practices in 25 projects," Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 71, p. 101804, 2021.
[34] S. Spyridonidou, G. Sismani, E. Loukogeorgaki, D. G. Vagiona, H. Ulanovsky, and D. Madar, "Sustainable spatial energy planning of large-scale wind and PV farms in Israel: A collaborative and participatory planning approach," Energies, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 551, 2021.
[35] S. S. Mirhosseini, M. Ramezani, M. Khazaei, and A. Azar, "Exploring and analysing the risks and challenges of implementing ERP systems: Critical system thinking," International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 234-258 https://doi.org/10.1504/ijiscm.2021.120325, 2021.
[36] M. D. Nayeri, M. Khazaei, and D. Abdolahbeigi, "The drivers of success in new-service development: Rough set theory approach," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 421-439 https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsom.2022.127465, 2022.
[37] M. Ramezani, A. Azar, and M. Khazaei, "Gap analysis through a hybrid method: Critical systems heuristics and best worst method," in The International Workshop on Best-Worst Method, 2021: Springer, pp. 272-286 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89795-6_19.
[38] M. Khazaei, M. Ramezani, A. Padash, and D. DeTombe, "The quantification role of BWM in problem structuring methods: SYRCS methodology," in the international workshop on best-worst method, 2021: Springer, pp. 252-271.
[39] M. Khazaei, M. Ramezani, A. Padash, and D. DeTombe, "Creating shared value to redesigning IT-service products using SYRCS; Diagnosing and tackling complex problems," Information Systems and e-Business Management, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 957-992, 2021.
[40] M. Dehghan Nayeri, M. Khazaei, and F. Alinasab-Imani, "The critical heuristics of iranian banking credit system: analysis of the antithetical opinions of the beneficiaries," Systemic Practice and Action Research, vol. 33, pp. 363-392, 2020.
[41] M. Dehghan Nayeri, M. Khazaei, and F. Alinasab Imani, "Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH) to Deal with Stakeholders' Contradictory Viewpoints of Iran Performance Based Budgeting System," Industrial Management Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 429-454, 2018.
[42] W. Ulrich, "A brief introduction to critical systems heuristics (CSH)," ECOSENSUS project site, 2005.
[43] M. Khazaei, M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, A. Rajabzadeh Ghatari, M. Ramezani, A. Fooladvand, and A. Azar, "A multi-criteria supplier evaluation and selection model without reducing the level of optimality," Soft Computing, pp. 1-14 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08954-8, 2023.
[44] A. Taghipour, A. Fooladvand, M. Khazaei, and M. Ramezani, "Criteria Clustering and Supplier Segmentation Based on Sustainable Shared Value Using BWM and PROMETHEE," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 11, p. 8670 https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118670, 2023.
[45] F. Gholian-Jouybari et al., "Developing environmental, social and governance (ESG) strategies on evaluation of municipal waste disposal centers: A case of Mexico," Chemosphere, vol. 364, p. 142961, 2024.
[46] A. Taghipour, M. Ramezani, M. Khazaei, V. Roohparvar, and E. Hassannayebi, "Smart Transportation Behavior through the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Ride-Hailing System in Iran," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 4178 https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054178.2023.
[47] A. Taghipour, M. Khazaei, A. Azar, A. Rajabzadeh Ghatari, M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, and M. Ramezani, "Creating shared value and strategic corporate social responsibility through outsourcing within supply chain management," Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 1940, 2022. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 145 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 32 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب