پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,112,607 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,216,343 |
Designing a Residential Valuation Model through Analytic Hierarchy Process | ||
| Advances in Industrial Engineering | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 48، شماره 2، دی 2014، صفحه 167-176 اصل مقاله (429.82 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jieng.2014.52911 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Kian Behdad؛ Mohammad taghi Isaai* 1؛ Mandana Farzaneh2 | ||
| 1School ofManagement and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, I.R. Iran | ||
| 2School of Management and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, I.R. Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The decision to buy, sell, design and construct residential apartments is a complex process due to a combination of multiplequalitative and quantitative factors. It thus requires a great deal of costs and time for decision makers in this market. Identifying these factors and determining the priority of them are importance for selectingan apartment. The aim of current research is to identify the affecting factorsof the desirability of a residential apartment by utilizing the knowledge and experience of experts in the housing market and then determine the priority ofeach factor through AHP method. In this case, certain experts in Mashhad city were chosen in order to specify the influential factors from the customers view point and rank them through paired comparison. In the last step, qualitative and quantitative factors are combined and the assessment model for determining the value ofresidential apartment is presented. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Residential apartment؛ Valuation؛ Utility؛ Decision making؛ Analytic Hierarchy Process | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| طراحی مدل ارزش‌گذاری واحدهای مسکونی با استفاده از فرایند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی (AHP) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| کیان بهداد؛ محمد تقی عیسایی1؛ ماندانا فرزانه2 | ||
| 1دانشیار گروه مدیریت دانشکدة مدیریت و اقتصاد دانشگاه صنعتی شریف | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد دانشگاه صنعتی شریف | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| تصمیم‌گیری برای خرید، فروش، طراحی، و احداث واحدهای مسکونی به دلیل تعدد عوامل و ترکیب ماهیتی‌ـ کیفی و مقداری‌ـ فرایندی پیچیده است که به صرف هزینه و زمان بسیار نیاز دارد. بنابراین، شناسایی این عوامل و تعیین میزان حساسیت بازار در زمینة رعایت آن‌ها برای انتخاب یک واحد مسکونی اهمیتی بسزا دارد. در این پژوهش، ابتدا با بهره‌گیری علمی از دانش و تجربة کارشناسان بازار مسکن عوامل مؤثر بر میزان مطلوبیت یک واحد آپارتمان مسکونی شناسایی و سپس میزان سهم هر عامل با استفاده از روش AHP محاسبه شد. برای استخراج داده‌ها از دانش خبرگان در شهرستان مشهد استفاده شد. سپس، مدل سنجش ارزش‌گذاری مسکن برای رتبه‌بندی واحدهای مسکونی با ترکیب عوامل کیفی و کمّی مؤثر بر مطلوبیت یک واحد مسکونی از نگاه مشتریان و استفاده از سهم و وزن نسبی آن‌ها ارائه شد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| ارزش‌گذاری, تصمیم‌گیری, فرایند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی, مطلوبیت, واحد مسکونی | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Gholizadeh, A. A., Behbudi, D., and Shokarian, E. (2010). “Comparison between Traditional Hedonic Price Model and Reid Hedonic Price Model (Case Study of Urban Regionsof Hamedan Province).” Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics., Vol. 7, No. 2, 119-147.
2. Daly, J., Gronow, S., Jenkins, D., and Plimmer, F. (2003). “Consumer Behaviour in the Valuation of Residential Property: A Study in the UK, Ireland and Australia.” Property Management., Vol. 21, No. 5, 295-314.
3. Ratchatakulpat, T., Miller, P., and Marchant, T. (2009). “Residential Real Estate Purchase Decisions in Australia: Is it more than Location?.” International Real Estate Review., Vol. 12, No. 3, 273-294.
4. LevLevy, D., Murphy, L., and Lee, C. K. C. (2008). “Influences and emotions: exploring family decision-making processes when buying a house.” Housing Studies., Vol. 23, No. 3, 271–289.
5. Gibler, K. M. and Nelson, S. L. (1998). “Consumer behavior applications to real estate.” Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education., Vol. 6, No. 1, 63-83.
6. Greaves, M. (1984). “The determinants of residential values: the hierarchical and statistical approaches.” Journal of Property Valuation and Investment., Vol. 3, No. 1, 5 –23.
7. Dupuis, A. and Thorns, D. C. (1998). “Home, Home Ownership and the Search for Ontological Security.” Sociological Review., Vol. 46, No. 1, 24-47.
8. Murphy, L, (2007). “Uncharted territory, home ownership and dynamics of the New Zealand housing marking 1994-2004.”, Housing Studies.
9. Thorns, D. C. (2006). “The Remaking of Housing Policy: The New Zealand Housing Strategy for the 21st Century.” Housing Finance International, Vol. 20, No. 4, 20-28.
10. Mackmin, D. (1994). The valuation and sale of residential property. 2nd edition, Routledge London New York.
11. Peter, J. P. and Olson, J. C. (1999). Consumer behavior and marketing strategy. 5th Ed. McGraw-Hill Pub. Co., New York.
12. Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (2005). Principles of marketing. 11th Ed. Prentice Hall Pub. Co., Englewood Cliffs.
13. Gibler, K. M. and Nelson, S. L. (1998). Consumer Behavior Application to Real Estate Education. American Real Estate Society Meeting, Monterey, CA.
14. Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia (http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/real estate pricing)
15. Scarret, D. (2008). Property Evaluation, The Five Methods. 2nd Ed. Taylor and Francis Pub. Co., UK.
16. Abbot, D. (2000). Encyclopedia of Real Estate Terms. 2nd Ed. Delta Alpha Pub. Co., London, UK.
17. Australia and New Zealand valuation and property standards, Note No. 13, (2005). 7th Ed. Australian Property Pub. Co., Australia.
18. Viteikiene, M., Zavadskas, E. K., and Turskis, Z. (2007). “Multiple-attribute evaluation of new construction influence to an apartments ranking: case study vilnius city”, Proc., 9th Int. Conf. onModern building materials, structures and techniques., Vilnius, Lithuania, 428-432.
19. Adair, As., Berry, J. N., and McGreal, W. S. (1996). “Hedonic Modeling, Housing Submarkets and residential valuation.” Journal of Property Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, 67-84.
20. Maleki, S. and Sheikhi, H. (2009). “The Role of Housing Social Indicators in the Country Provinces, by Using Compound Human Development Index Method.” Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, Vol. 28, No. 127, 67-84.
21. Sattarzadeh, D. (2009). “Housing indicators in Sistan and Baluchestan Province.” Journal of geographical landscape of Zagros, Vol. 1, No. 1, 85-100.
22. Farahmand, N. F. (2009). “Socio - Economical Priorities in Qualified Preferences of Housing.” Knowledge & Development, Vol 16, No 26, 170-189.
23. Hataminejad, H., Seifeddini, F., and Mire, M. (2007). “Evaluation of informal housing indexes: Sheikh Abad district of Qom.” Geographical Research Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 6, 129-145.
24. Hoseini, M. H., Hosseinpor, M., Soltani, A., and Ardeshiri, M. (2013). “Presenting a method for determination of maximum building density on scale of urban residential blocks.” Urban Management, Vol. 31, No. 11, 27-40.
25. Yau, Y., Ho, D. C.-w., Chau, K.-w., and Lau, W.-y. (2009). “Estimation algorithm forn predicting the performance of private apartment buildings in Hong Kong.” Structural Survey, Vol. 27, No. 5, 372-389.
26. Saari, A. and Tanskanen, H. (2011). “Quality level assessment model for senior housing.” Property Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, 34-49.
27. Aluko, B. T. (2007). “Examining Valuer’s Judgment in Residential Property Valuations in Metropolitan Lagos, Nigeria.” Property Management, Vol. 25.
28. Richardson, H., Gordon, P., Jun, M. J., Hikkila, E., Peiser, R., and Dale-Johnson, D. (1990). “Residential Property Values, the CBD, and Multiple Nodes: Further Analysis.” Environment and Planning, Vol. 22, No. 6, 829-833.
29. Yam, L. H. S. and McGreal, W. S. (2010). “House-buyers’ expectations with relation to corporate social responsibility for Malaysian housing.” International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Vol. 3, No. 2, 132-145.
30. Cozens, P., Hillier, D., and Prescott, G. (2001). “Crime and Design of Residential Property Exploring the theoretical Background – Part 1.” Property Management, Vol. 19, No. 2, 136-164.
31. Langley, C. J. (1976). “Adverse Impact of the Washington Beltway on Residential Property Values.” Land Economics, Vol. 52, No. 1, 54-65.
32. Bullen, P. and Love, P. (2011). “Factors influencing the adaptive re-use of buildings.” Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 32-46.
33. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
34. Saaty, T. L. and Kearns, K. (1985). Analytical Planning: The Organization of Systems. 1st Ed. Pergamon Press Pub. Co., Oxford.
35. Saaty, T. L. (2008). “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process.” Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 83–98.
36. Goepel, K. D. (2013). “Implementing the analytic hierarchy process as a standard method for multi-criteria decision making in corporate enterprises – a new AHP excel template with multiple inputs.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1-10.
37. Alessio, I. and Ashraf, L. (2009). “Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and Limitations.”, ORInsight, Vol. 22, No. 4, 201–220.
38. Ishizaka, A. and Labib, A. (2011). “Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process.” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, No. 11, 14336-14345.
39. Wong, J. K. W. and Li, H. (2008). “Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems.” Building and Environment, Vol. 43, No. 1, 108–125. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,817 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,521 |
||