تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,118,766 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,224,851 |
نگاشت مفهومی و اعتباریابی مدل عوامل مؤثر بر بهکارگیری سیاستپژوهی در سیاستگذاری | ||
مجله علمی "مدیریت فرهنگ سازمانی" | ||
مقاله 10، دوره 12، شماره 4، دی 1393، صفحه 787-808 اصل مقاله (477.81 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jomc.2014.53103 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
علی حمیدی زاده* 1؛ رحمت اله قلی پور2 | ||
1استادیار، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران | ||
2دانشیار، دانشکدة مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف اصلی این مقاله، طراحی مدل عوامل مؤثر بر بهکارگیری سیاستپژوهی با فن نگاشت مفهومی و اعتبارسنجی آن است. بدین منظور یک تحقیق در سه مرحله با روش ترکیبی از نوع متوالی- اکتشافی اجرا شده است. در مرحلة اول، عوامل از طریق مرور متون تحقیق، مصاحبه و برگزاری گروه کانونی شناسایی شد. در این مرحله برای تجزیهوتحلیل دادهها تحلیل تم بهکار گرفته شد. در مرحلة دوم برای طراحی مدل فن نگاشت مفهومی بهکار گرفته شد. در نهایت، در مرحلة سوم برای اعتبارسنجی مدل طراحیشده روش تحلیل عاملی تأییدی اجرا شد. جامعة آماری در این تحقیق استادان و محقاق [j1] حوزة خطمشیگذاری عمومی و کارشناسان شورای تخصصی حوزوی شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی است. روش نمونهگیری چندسطحی و در سطوح مختلف روش هدفمند- متوالی در دستور کار قرار گرفته است. تعداد اعضای نمونه در مصاحبه 10 نفر، گروه کانونی 7 نفر، طراحی مدل 19 نفر و اعتبارستجی مدل 83 نفر است. نتایج طراحی مدل نشان داد عوامل در قالب 18 مؤلفه و 4 بعد شامل تحقیق، خطمشیگذار، ویژگیهای هویتی محقق و زمینه است. در مرحلة اعتبارسنجی نیز مدل طراحی شده تأیید شد. [j1]منظور محققان است؟؟؟ | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
تحلیل عاملی تأییدی؛ خطمشی گذاری؛ سیاستپژوهی؛ نگاشت مفهومی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Concept Mapping and Verifying Model of Factors Affecting Utilization of Policy Research in Policy Making | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Ali Hamidizadeh1؛ Rahmatollah Gholipour2 | ||
1Assistant Professor, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
2Associate Professor, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran,Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The main purpose of this research is designing model of factors that affect utilization of policy research with concept mapping technique and verifying it. For this in three stage, Sequential-Exploratory Mixed Methods Design is used. In first stage, literature review, interview and focus group is used for identifying factors. The analysis is used for analyzing data. In second stage for designing model, concept mapping is used and finally in third stage for verifying model, Conformity factor analysis is used.Population is teachers and researchers of public policy making area and policy makers of Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. In different level of multi-level sampling, sequential-Purposive way is used. Sample size is in interview 10, focus group 7, and designing model 19 and verifying it 83.As result shown in designing, the model consist of 18 components and 4 dimensions (context, identity features of researcher, researchers, research users). Also in verifying stage, the model that is designed confirms. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Concept mapping, Conformity factor analysis, Policy making, Policy research, Utilization | ||
مراجع | ||
الوانی، سیدمهدی (1384). تصمیمگیری و تعیین خطمشی دولتی. تهران، انتشارات سمت. قلیپور، رحمتاله؛ پورسید، بهزاد؛ حمیدیزاده، علی؛ امیری، عبدالرضا (1389). «بررسی تأثیر سیاستپژوهی در فضای سیاستگذاری (مطالعة موردی: مرکز پژوهشهای مجلس شورای اسلامی». دورة 2، شمارة 4، صفحات 144-127. کبیری، مسعود (1388). «مدلهای کاربست یافتههای پژوهشی و نقش آنها در مدیریت پژوهشی، به مثابة یک حوزة میان رشتهای». فصلنامة مطالعات میانرشتهای در علوم انسانی، دورة اول، شمارة 4، صفحات 168-147. مارژزاک، آن (1379). روشهای سیاستپژوهی (پژوهش برای سیاستگذاری). ترجمة هوشنگ نایبی، تهران، مؤسسة فرهنگی انتشاراتی تبیان Anderson, Cathy; James A. Ciarlo; Susan, Brodie (1981). Measuring Evaluation-Induce Changing Mental Health Programs. In Utilizing Evaluation. Concepts and Measurement Techniquese, dated by James A. Ciarlo,9 7-124. Beverly H ills, CA: Sage Publications.
Anthes, Catherine (2007). An Exploratory Study of how Policy Research is Used in the Policy Process by Policymaker Staff and Public Administrators. Ph. D. diss., University of Colorado at Denver and Health Science Center.
Beck, U.(1992). Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publications. London.
Beyer, Janice; Harrison Trice (1982). “The Utilization Process. A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings”. A dministrativeS cience Quarterly, 27(4), 591-622.
Birkland, Thomas (2001). An Introduction to the Policy Process. Armonk, NY, M.E. Sharpe.
Bookmyer, Joanne M. (1999). "Policy research in the age of think tanks".Ph. D. diss., University of Arizona State.
Bozeman, Barry (1986). “The Credibility of Policy Analysis: Between Method and Use”. Policy Studies Journal, 14(4), 519- 39.
Brown, Ted; Mei Hui Tseng; Jaqueline Casey; Rachael McDonald; Carissa Lyons (2010). "Predictors of Research Utilization Among Pediatric Occupational Therapists ". Occupation, Participation and Health, 30(4), 172-183.
Caplan, Nathan (1975). The Use of Social Science Information by Federal Executives. In Social Science and Public Policies, edited by Gene M. Lyons, 47-67. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College, Public Affairs Center.
Conner, Ross (1981). Measuring Evaluation Utilization: A Critique of Different Techniques. In Utilizing Evaluation. Concepts and MeasuremenTt echniquese, ditedb y JamesA. Ciarlo, 59-76. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Davies, Huw T.O.; Sandra M. Nutley; Peter C. Smith (ads.) (2009). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Britain: The Policy Press
Dukeshire, S; Thurlow, J. (2002). "Understanding the Link Between Research and Policy”, Rural Communities Impacting Policy Project, 18, 1-18.
Dunn, W. (1994). Public policy Analysis: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dunn, William; Burkart Holzner; Gerald Zaltman (1985). Knowledge Utilization. In International Encyclopedia of Education, edited by Torsten Husen and Neville T. Postlewaite, 2831-39. Oxford, UK: Pergamum.
Eriksson J.; Sundelius B. (2005). “Molding minds that form policy: how to make research useful”. International Studies Perspectives, 6, 51-71
Estabrooks, Carole A.; Judith A. Floyd; Shannon, Scott-Findlay; Katherine A. O’Leary; Matthew, Gushta. (2003). "Individual determinants of research utilization: a systematic review ". Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43(5), 506–520.
Finch, J. (1986) Research and policy: The use of qualitative methods in social and educational research, London, Falmer Press.
Funk, Sandra G.; Elizabeth M. Tornquist; Mary T. Champagne.(1995). "Barriers and facilitators of research utilization” Research Utilization, 30 ,30(3), 395-407
Greenberg, David H.; Marvin B. Mandell. (1991)."Research Utilization in Policymaking: A Tale of Two Series (Of Social Experiments)". Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(4), 633-656.
Greenberg, David H.; Marvin B. Mandell. (1991)."Research Utilization in Policymaking: A Tale of Two Series (Of Social Experiments)". Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(4), 633-656
Harremoes, P. et al. (Eds.) (2001) Late Lessons from Early Warnings: the Precautionary Principle 1896–2000, EEA. Environmental Issue Report, No. 22, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
Hird, J. A. (2005). Power, knowledge, and politics: Policy analysis in the states. Washington DC: Georgetown UniversityHove, S. van den. (2007). "A rationale for science–policy interfaces". Futures 39: 807–826.
Huberman, Michael, and Gather Thurler. 1991. De la recherché a la pratique. (From research to practice). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang SA, Editions scientifiques europeennes.
Huberman, Michael. 1987. Steps Toward an Integrated Model of Research Utilization, Knowledge. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang SA, Editions scientifiques europeennes.
Huberman, Michael.. 1994. Research Utilization: The State of Art. Knowledge and Policy 7(4): 13-33.
Huberman, Michael.. 1999. The Mind Is Its Own Place: The Influence of SustainedI nteractivity with Practitionerso n EducationalR esearchers. Harvard Educational Review 69(3): 289-319.
Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., Goering, P. (2004) “Organizational factors that influence university-based researchers’ engagement in knowledge transfer activities”, Science Communication, 25 (3), PP. 246-259.
Johnson, R. B. (1998) “Toward a theorical model of evaluation utilization”. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21, 93-110.
Kirkhart, K. (2000).” Reconceptualizing evaluation use: an integrated theory of influence”. New Directions for Evaluation, Winter 2000 (88), 5-23.
Knorr, Karen (1977). PolicymakersU' se of Social Science Knowledge: Symbolic or Instrumental?. In Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, edited by C.H. Weiss, 165-82. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Landry, Réjean;. Moktar, Lamari; Nabil, Amara (2003). "The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government". Public Administration Review. 63(2), 192-205
Larsen, Judith; Paul Werner (1981). Measuring Utilization of Mental Health Program Consultation. Utilizing Evaluation. Concepts and Measurement Techniques, edited by James A. Ciarlo, 77-96. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Lee, Robert; Raymond Staffeldt (1977). “Executive and Legislative Use of Policy Analysis in the State Budgetary Process: Survey Results’. Policy Analysis, 3(3), 395-406.
Lerner D., Lasswell H., 1951. “The Policy Orientation.” In The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lester, James; Leah Wilds (1990). “The Utilization of Public Policy Analysis: A Conceptual Framework”. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13(3), 313-319.
Lester, James (1993). “The Utilization of Policy Analysis by State Agency Officials. Knowledge: Creation”. Diffusion, Utilization, 14(3), 267-290.
Lindblom, C.; Cohen, D.K. (1979). Useable Knowledge: Social Science and Problem Solving. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.
Lomas, Jonathan (1997). “Research and Evidence-Based Decision Making”. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 21(5), 439-41.
Lomas, Jonathan (2000). ”Using "Linkage and Exchange" to Move Research into Policy at a Canadian Foundation”. Health Affairs, 19(3), 236-40.
Oh, Cheol; Robert Rich (1996). “Explaining Use of Information in Public Policymaking”. Knowledge and Policy,’ 9(1), 3- 35.
Oh, Cheol (2000). Science and Politics. A View from an Information Utilization Perspective. Paper presented at the International Political Science Association World Congress, July 29-August 1, Quebec City, Canada.
Oreszczyn. S; Carr. S. ( 2008)." Improving the link between policy research and practice: using a scenario workshop as a qualitative research tool in the case of genetically modified crops". Qualitative Research, 8, 473-497
Parahoo, Kader. (2000)." Barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization among nurses in Northern Ireland". Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(1), 89-98
Pelz, Donald; Jo Anne Horsley (1981). Measuring Utilization of Nursing Research. In Utilizing Evaluation. Concepts and Measurement Techniquese, dited b y James A. Ciarlo,1 25- 49. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Retsas, Andrew. (2000). Barriers to using research evidence in nursing practice". Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(3), 599-606.
Sabatier, Paul. (1978). “The Acquisition and Utilization of Technical Informationb y AdministrativeA gencies”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(3), 396-417.
Scanks, Elieen Bradley. (2005). A Study of Texas Principals` Perceptions of Barriers to Research Utilization. Ph.D. diss., Baylor university.
Schneider, A. L.; Ingram, H. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Tetroe, J. M.; Graham, I. D.; Foy, R.; Robinson, N.; Eccles, M. P.; Wensing, M.; Durieux, P.; Legare, F.; Nielson, C. P.; Adily, A, Ward, J. E.; Porter, C.; Beverley Shea, J. M. (2008). “Health Research Funding Agencies’ Support and Promotion of Knowledge Translation: An International Study”. The Milbank Quarterly, 86 (1), 125–155.
Webber, David (1984). “Political Conditions Motivating Legislators' Use of Policy Information”. Policy Studies Review, 4(1), 110-18.
Webber, David (1987). “Legislators' Use of Policy Information”. American Behavioral Scientist, 30(6), 612-631.
Weimer, D. L.; Vining, A. R. (1989). Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Weiss, Carol H. (1979). "The Many Meanings of Research Utilization". Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426-431
Weiss, Carol (1981). Measuring the Use of Evaluation. In Utilizing Evaluation. Concepts and Measuring Techniques. edited by James A. Ciarlo, 17-33. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Whiteman, David Paul (1985). “The Fate of Policy Analysis in Congressional Decision Making: Three Types of Use in Committees”. Western Political Quarterly, 38(2), 294-311. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,907 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,402 |