پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,105,624 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,211,131 |
Survey on the Priority Factors Influencing IT Outsourcing in the Platform of Cloud Computing in Semnan Province Universities by Fuzzy DEMATEL Technique | ||
| Journal of Information Technology Management | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 7، شماره 2، مهر 2015، صفحه 325-344 اصل مقاله (448.41 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jitm.2015.53993 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mir Saeed Shafaee Tonekaboni* 1؛ Reza Sheikh2؛ Mohammad Mehdi Jalali3 | ||
| 1MSc. Student, Department of Information Technology, Electronic Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Shahrood University, Shahrood, Iran | ||
| 3Instructor, Faculty of Computer Engineering and IT, Shahrood University, Shahrood, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Today, Information Technology Outsourcing (ITO) has developed and caused organizations to become more flexible and dynamic than they were before. The ever-increasing development of ICT is one of the main reasons for the promotion of outsourcing. That is due to the fact that many organizations are not able to adapt their hardware and software in accordance with the fast-paced technology development. Cloud Computing is considered as one of newest paradigms in ITO. Due to its flexible nature, this paradigm has been able to protect organizations against extreme changes of IT during recent years. Furthermore, by better understanding their needs and prioritizing them, organizations can experience a more successful outsourcing in the context of Cloud Computing. SMI can be a considerable help in identifying organization’s needs to use Cloud Computing. This article suggests that organizations use Fuzzy DEMATEL Technique to prioritize their needs. In this research which is conducted as a case study, all the universities in Semnan Province are examined. The results show that the most important criteria for outsourcing in the context of Cloud Computing are Compliance, Operability and Contracting Experience respectively. Moreover, the model has identified Security Management, Ownership and Contracting Experience as the most effective criteria and Learnability, Maintainability and Recoverability as the most affected one. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Cloud Computing؛ Fuzzy Dematel technique؛ IT outsourcing؛ Service measurement index (SMI) | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| پیمایشی دربارۀ اولویتبندی عوامل مؤثر بر برونسپاری فناوری اطلاعات در بستر رایانش ابری، در دانشگاههای استان سمنان با بهرهمندی از روش دیمتل فازی | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| میر سعید شفایی تنکابنی1؛ رضا شیخ2؛ محمدمهدی جلالی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشگاه آزاد، واحد الکترونیکی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکدۀ مهندسی صنایع و مدیریت، دانشگاه شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار گروه فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکدۀ مهندسی کامپیوتر و فناوری اطلاعات، دانشگاه شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| رایانش ابری از جدیدترین پارادایمهای برونسپاری فناوری اطلاعات بهشمار میرود که توانسته است در چند سال اخیر با توجه به ماهیت انعطافپذیرش، سازمانها را در مقابل تغییرات مداوم فناوری اطلاعات محافظت کند. مدیران سازمانها با شناخت دقیق نیازها و اولویتبندی آنها میتوانند برونسپاری موفقتری را در بستر رایانش ابری تجربه کنند. در این راستا، کنسرسیوم طرح اندازهگیری خدمات ابری، شاخصهای استانداردی را به نام شاخص اندازهگیری خدمات برای مقایسة خدمات ابری فراهم آورده است که می‌تواند کمک بسزایی در شناسایی نیازهای سازمان برای رویآوردن به رایانش ابری پیشنهاد کند. این مقاله برای اولویتبندی نیازهای سازمانها، روش دیمتل فازی را پیشنهاد میکند. در این روش، نظر خبرگان فناوری اطلاعات دربارۀ برونسپاری بخش فناوری اطلاعات در بستر رایانش ابری، پس از جمعآوری، اولویتبندی میشود. مطالعة موردی این پژوهش، دانشگاههای استان سمنان است. نتایج بهدستآمده از پیادهسازی این مدل، نشان میدهد مهمترین معیارهای برونسپاری در بستر رایانش ابری، بهترتیب پذیرش، کارایی و تجربة قرارداد است. همچنین این مدل نشان میدهد مدیریت امنیت، مالکیت و تجربة قرارداد، از معیارهای تأثیرگذارند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| : برونسپاری فناوری اطلاعات, رایانش ابری, روش دیمتل فازی, شاخص اندازه گیری خدمات | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Agha Ebrahimi Samani, B., Makooii, A., Sadr Lahiji, M. & Homayon, V. (2008), Assessment challenges of Iranian companies in oil and gas projects by DEMATEL Technique. Sharif Science and Research Journal. 24(45): 121-129.
Böhm, M., Leimeister, S., Riedl, C. & Krcmar, H. (2011). Cloud computing–outsourcing 2.0 or a new business model for IT provisioning? In Keuper, F. Oecking, C. & Degenhardt, A. (eds.) Application Management, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, Germany. 31-56.
Chang, C.W., Liu, P. & Wu, J.J. (2012). Probability-based Cloud storage providers selection algorithms with maximum availability. In: Proceedings of the international conference on parallel processing (ICPP). 10-13 September. Pittsburgh, PA.
Chen, C., Yan, S., Zhao, G., Lee, B.S. & Singhal, S. (2012). A systematic framework enabling automatic conflict detection and explanation in Cloud service selection for enterprises. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 5th international conference on Cloud computing (CLOUD). June 24-29, Honolulu, HI.
Costa, P., Carlos Lourenço, J. & Mira da Silva, M. (2013). Evaluating Cloud Services Using a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Approach. in Basu, S. Pautasso, C. Zhang, L. Fu, X. (eds.) Service-Oriented Computing, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg: 456-464.
Dastjerdi, A.V., Tabatabaei, S.GH. & Buyya, R. (2010). An effective architecture for automated appliance management system applying ontology-based Cloud discovery. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE/ACM international conference on cluster, Cloud and grid computing (CCGrid). May 17-20, Melbourne, Australia.
Garfinkel, S. (2011). The Cloud Imperative. Retrieved from http://www. technologyreview.com/news/425623/the-Cloud-imperative.
Garg, S.K., Versteeg, S. & Buyya, R. (2011). SMICloud: A Framework for Comparing and Ranking Cloud Services. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing. December 5-7, Melbourne, Australia.
Godse, M. & Mulik. S. (2009). An approach for selecting software-as-a-service (SaaS) product. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on Cloud computing (CLOUD). September 21-25, Bangalore.
He, Q., Han, J., Yang, Y., Grundy, J. & Jin, H. (2012). QoS-driven service selection for multi-tenant SaaS. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 5th international conference on Cloud computing (CLOUD). June 24-29, Honolulu, HI.
Hormozi, A., Hostetler, E. & Middleton, C. (2003). Outsourcing Information Technology: Assessing Your Options. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 68 (4): 18-23.
Hsieh, T.Y., Lu, S.T. & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7): 573-584.
Hussey, D. & Jenster, P. (2003). Outsourcing: the supplier viewpoint. Strategic Change, 12 (1): 7-20.
Jenster, P. V. & Pedersen, H. S. (2000). Outsourcing-facts and fiction. Strategic Change, 9 (3): 147-154.
Jung, G., Mukherjee, T., Kunde, S., Kim, H., Sharma, N. & Goetz, F. (2013). Cloud Advisor :a recommendation-as-a-service platform for Cloud configuration and pricing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ninth world congress on service (SERVICES). Santa Clara, CA.
Kanagasabai, R. (2012). OWL-S based semantic Cloud service broker. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 19th international conference on web services (ICWS). June 24-29, Honolulu, HI.
Karim, R., Ding, C. & Miri, A. (2013). An end-to-end QoS mapping approach for Cloud service selection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 9th world congress on services (SER- VICES). June 27-July 2, Santa Clara Marriott, CA.
Klepper, R. & Jones, W.O. (1998). Outsourcing information technology systems and services. Prentice-Hall,Englewood cliffs, NJ.
Lacity, M. C., Khan, S. A. & Willcocks, L. P. (2009). A review of the IT outsourcing literature: Insights for practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18 (3): 130–146.
Limam, N. & Boutaba, R. (2010). Assessing software service quality and trustworthiness at selection time. IEEE TransactionsSoftware Engineering. 36 (4): 559–74.
Martens, B. & Teuteberg, F. (2012). Decision-making in Cloud computing environments: a cost and risk based approach. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14 (4): 871–93.
Martens, B., Teuteberg, F. & Gräuler, M. (2011). Design and implementation of a community platform for the evaluation and selection of Cloud computing services: a market analysis. In: ECIS2011proceedings.
Mell, P. & Grance, T. (2009). The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. Retrieved 23 November, 2014, from http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-145/SP800-145.pdf.
Menzel, M., Schönherr, M. & Tai, S. (2013). (MC2)2: criteria , requirements and a software prototype for Cloud infrastructure decisions. Software: Practice and Expereince, 43 (11): 1283–1297.
Pfannenstein, L.L. & Tsai, R. J. (2004). Offshore outsourcing: Current and future effects on American IT industry. ISM Journal, 21 (4): 72-80.
Quinton, C., Romero, D. & Duchien, L. (2014). Automated selection and configuration of Cloud environments using software product lines principles. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE international conference on Cloud computing (CLOUD). June 27-July 2, Alaska.
Saripalli, P. & Pingali, G. (2011). MADMAC: multiple attribute decision methodology for adoption of Clouds. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on Cloud computing (CLOUD). July 4-9, Washington, DC.
Siegel, J. & Perdue, J. (2012). Cloud Services Measurement Global Use: The Service Measurement Index (SMI). Proceeding of the SRII Global Conference (SRII), 2012 Annual, 24-27 July, San Jose, CA, USA, 411-415.
Silas, S., Rajsingh, EB. & Ezra, K. (2012). Efficient service selection middleware using ELECTRE methodology for Cloud environments. Information Technology Journal, 11(7): 868–75.
SMI. (2011, September 1). Retrieved from http://csmic.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2011/09/SMI-Overview-110913_v1F1.pdf.
SMI. (2014). Retrieved from http://csmic.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/SMI_ Overview_140113.pdf.
Sun, L., Dong, H., Khadeer Hussain, F., Khadeer Hussain, O., Chang, E. (2014). Cloud service selection: State-of-the-art and future research directions. Journal of Network and Computer Application, 45:134-150.
Sundareswaran, S., Squicciarini, A. & Lin, D. (2012). A brokerage-based approach for Cloud service selection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 5th international conference on Cloud computing (CLOUD). Honolulu, HI.
Tsaur, S.H., Chang, T.Y. & Yen, C.H. (2002). The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management, 23(2): 107-115.
Wittern, E., Kuhlenkamp, J. & Menzel, M. (2012). Cloud service selection based on variability modeling. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on service- oriented computing (ICSOC), November 12-15, Shanghai, China.
Yang, J., Lin,W. & Dou,W. (2013). An adaptive service selection method for cross-Cloud service composition. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 25(18): 2435–2454.
Ye, Z., Bouguettaya, A. & Zhou, X. (2012). QoS-aware Cloud service composition based on economic models. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on service- oriented computing (ICSOC), November 12-15, Shanghai, China.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8: 338-353.
Zeng, W., Zhao, Y. & Zeng, J. (2009). Cloud service and service selection algorithm research. In: Proceedings of the first ACM/SIGEVO summit on genetic and evolutionary computation (ACMSIGEVO). Shanghai, China.
Zhao, L., Ren, Y., Li, M. & Sakurai, K. (2012). Flexible service selection with user-specific QoS support in service-oriented architecture. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35 (3): 962–973.
Zheng, Z., Wu, X., Zhang, Y., Lyu, M. & Wang, J. (2013). QoS ranking prediction for Cloud services. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS), 24(99): 1213–1222.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,650 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,100 |
||