پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,109,797 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,213,553 |
ارزیابی عوامل مؤثر بر مکانیابی اسکان اضطراری (مطالعۀ موردی: شهر ارومیه) | ||
| پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی | ||
| مقاله 143، دوره 49، شماره 2، تیر 1396، صفحه 325-340 اصل مقاله (1.07 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jhgr.2017.55827 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی داداش زاده* 1؛ مسعود تقوایی2؛ اصغر ضرابی2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دورة دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری پژوهشگاه مهندسی بحران‌های طبیعی، اصفهان | ||
| 2استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری پژوهشگاه مهندسی بحران‌های طبیعی، اصفهان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه مدیریت بحران جزء جدایی‌ناپذیر برنامه‌ریزی شهری معاصر تلقی می‌شود و از جمله سناریوهای کارآمد برای ساماندهی وضعیت آسیب‌دیدگان «مکانیابی اسکان اضطراری» است. اسکان اضطراری مرحله‌ای است که طی آن فرایندهای اجتماعی توانمندسازی و بهبود نوع سکونتگاه‌ها پس از بحران صورت می‌گیرد. از نظر اجتماعی مسکن اضطراری به‌معنای نجات آوارگان، کمک به مصدومان و شروع فعالیت‌های روزانه پس از بحران است. در این نوع اسکان، فرایندهای اجتماعی توانمندسازی و بهبود نوع سکونتگاه‌ها پس از بحران انجام می‌گیرد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف «ارزیابی عوامل مؤثر بر مکانیابی اسکان اضطراری مطالعة موردی شهر ارومیه» است. رویکرد حاکم بر این پژوهش توصیفی- تحلیلی و نوع تحقیق اسنادی و پیمایشی است. براساس داده‌های مستخرج از طرح جامع شهر ارومیه، ابتدا شبکه‌های دسترسی، عامل طبیعی، مدیریت، امنیت و فاکتور عملکردی به‌صورت پیمایشی روی نقشه مشخص شد. سپس از کارشناسان مسائل شهری خواسته شد براساس مقایسات زوجی اولویت‌هایی را مشخص سازند. نتایج تحقیق نشان می‌دهد عامل طبیعی با میانگین وزنی 102/0 رتبة اول، عامل دسترسی با میانگین وزنی 087/0 رتبة دوم، عامل مدیریت با میانگین وزنی 075/0 رتبة سوم، عامل امنیت با میانگین وزنی 068/0 رتبة چهارم و درنهایت عامل عملکردی با میانگین وزنی 061/0 رتبة پنجم را دارد. در واقع فاکتورهای مؤثر بر مکانیابی اسکان اضطراری سهم متفاوتی در تحقق آن دارند که نیازمند توجه جدی مدیران و تصمیم‌سازان شهری است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اسکان اضطراری؛ بحران‌های شهری؛ بلایای طبیعی؛ شهر ارومیه؛ GIS | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Assess Factors Affecting Emergency Settlement Site Selections, a Case Study of Urmia City | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Dadashzade1؛ Masoud Taghvaei2؛ Asghar Zarabi2 | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction The environmental health conditions faced by people are largely affected by the location and organization of the site where they obliged to live in the days, weeks or months after a disaster. Sheltering which is a priority for relief organizations, denotes the activity of staying in a place aftermath a disaster where daily routines are suspended. Shelter is one of the primary needs of the affected people in the post-disaster phase. Similar to the other reconstruction and rehabilitation processes, settlement of the affected people should be undertaken within a long-term strategy. This strategy could be different in various disasters and communities. In an ideal type which is applied in the United States, it includes four phases. These are emergency sheltering, temporary sheltering, temporary housing and permanent housing. Emergency shelters are generally for one or a couple of days after the event. This situation usually does not need extensive preparation of food or other services and may be a public shelter, motel, hotel room, friend’s house, tent, trailer, camper, or a plastic sheet. Temporary shelters are for longer periods after a disaster that is few weeks, and can be tent, camp or a public mass shelter. Finally, housing which could be divided into temporary or permanent phases; denotes the return to normal daily activities. Shelter strategy in some communities differs from this and comprises three phases. Here emergency sheltering is not limited to one or a couple of days and may take several weeks. It is needed to have various sheltering programs in place. They could be activated in different situations depending on the types of damages and available resources. If not planned, choosing proper site for emergency or temporary shelters will be arranged within a limited time after a disaster. Moreover, lack of proper criteria for site selection can be led to undesirable consequences or people deny accepting the site. Some consequences include subsequent secondary disasters, lack of safety, cultural or climatic inappropriateness, social problems, delays linked to the procurement of shelters, finding sites, and lack of organizational services. Some available texts such as the Sphere project present the minimum standards of sheltering in disasters. But the question is “which criteria can be applied for site selection of emergency or temporary shelters in an earthquake affected area?” so the assessment of Salmas earthquake (1930), Lar (1960), Buin Zahra (1962), Rudbar and Manjil (1960), earthquake (2003) act. Characterized that Iranian cities have not integrate planning to in the context of dealing with potential crises. study showed that several factors affect the Emergency Settlement Site Selections The natural dimension (the distance from the river, away from faults), The performance dimensions (distance from volatile sources such as high voltage, Privacy highways, etc.), since access (distance from the fire departments, educational, health, security, etc.), Security (such as maintaining ownership, protect property, ensure permanent settlements, etc.) and finally management measures (management of rescue, Refugee operations, Aid to refugees, providing space for health services, providing the opportunity to exploit the camps and etc.) Most play an effective role on Emergency Settlement Site Selections. Methodology: The current study aims at Assess Factors Affecting Emergency Settlement Site Selections, a Case Study of Urmia City. Research method is documentary and survey. According to the urmia’s master plan, firstly access networks, population density, fire station and etc., Based on field observations was marked on the map. Then urban experts were asked to identify their priorities on the basis of paired comparisons. Ultimately, proper Strategies have been recommended for the Assess Factors Affecting Emergency Settlement Site Selections, a Case Study of Urmia City. The study population was estimated using Morgan 45 and to analyze data TOPSIS model has been employed. According to gathered data, Emergency Settlement Site Selections Factors was prioritized. Results and discussion: Land-use planning is the general term used for a branch of urban planning encompassing various disciplines which seek to order and regulate land use in an efficient and ethical way, thus preventing land-use conflicts. Governments use land-use planning to manage the development of land within their jurisdictions. In doing so, the governmental unit can plan for the needs of the community while safeguarding natural resources. To this end, it is the systematic assessment of land and water potential, alternatives for land use, and economic and social conditions in order to select and adopt the best land-use options. Often one element of a comprehensive plan, a land-use plan provides a vision for the future possibilities of development in neighborhoods, cities, or any defined planning area. One of the most important issues of land use is Emergency Settlement Site Selections. Shelter is a critical determinant for survival in the initial stages of a disaster. Beyond survival, shelter is necessary to provide security and personal safety, protection from the climate and enhanced resistance to ill health and disease. It is also important for human dignity and to sustain family and community life as far as possible in difficult circumstances. Research findings show that Natural, access, management, security and Performance factors, respectively ranked first (0.102- weighted average), second (0.087- weighted average), third (0.075- weighted average), fourth (0.068- weighted average) and fifth (0.061- weighted average). According to the findings, some strategies have been recommended, which they need the serious care of urban managers and planners in the Uremia. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that several factors affect the Emergency Settlement Site Selections The natural dimension (the distance from the river, away from faults), The performance dimensions (distance from volatile sources such as high voltage, Privacy highways, etc.), since access (distance from the fire departments, educational, health, security, etc.), Security (such as maintaining ownership, protect property, ensure permanent settlements, etc.) and finally management measures (management of rescue, Refugee operations, Aid to refugees, providing space for health services, providing the opportunity to exploit the camps and etc.) Most play an effective role on Emergency Settlement Site Selections. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Natural disasters, Urban Crises, Emergency Settlement, GIS, Urmia city | ||
| مراجع | ||
Asadi nazari, M., 2004, Planning and locating temporary settlement camps for earthquake survivors case studies, Tehran 6 Region 1 district, 2nd International Conference on Natural Disaster Crisis Management, PP. 1 -16.
Islami, A., 2006, Relief and resettlement centers site selection case study Tehran 1 district, Civilica Publication, PP. 44- 49.
Omidvar, B., Nojavan, M. and Baradaran Shoraka, M., 2010, Lactating temporary settlement using GIS case study Tehran 1 districts, 2nd Conference of Planning and Urban Management, Tehran, PP. 1- 10.
Ahmadi Kamar Poshti, M. and Pour Mohammad, B., 2011, Temporary housing in the earthquake, furniture and utilities, Vol. 1, No. 1, PP. 18- 24.
5. حبیبی، کیومرث، بهزادفر، مصطفی، مشکینی، ابوالفضل و سعید نظری، 1392، تهیۀ یک مدل پیش‌بینی ناپایداری بافت‌های کهن شهری دربرابر زلزله با منطق سلسله‌مراتبی وارون و سامانۀ اطلاعات جغرافیایی، علوم زمین، سال بیست‌و‌دوم، شمارة 87، صص 83- 92.Habibi, K., Behzadfar, M., Meshkini, A. and Nazari, S., 2013, Develop apredictive modelof the oldurbantissueinstabilitywhit IHWP Method & GIS, Earth Science, Vol. 22, No. 87, PP. 83- 92.
6. حسنی، نعمت، 1383، ضرورت بازنگری در مدیریت بحران زلزله در ایران، مجموعه مقالات کارگاه مشترک ایران و ژاپن، نشریة سازمان مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی کشور، سال اول، شمارة 198، صص 37- 49.Hassani, N. 2004, Necessity of reviewing in earthquakes - disaster management in Iran,, Iran-Japan joint workshop proceedings, Journal of Management and Planning Organization, Vol. 3, No. 198, PP. 37- 49.
7. رفعتیان، مجتبی، عسگری، علی، مرادیان، پیمان و رها پولادی، 1385، تحلیلی بر مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی اسکان‌های موقت در فرایند بازسازی پس از سانحه مطالعة موردی: زلزلة بم، دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدیریت جامع بحران در حوادث غیرمترقبه طبیعی، تهران، صص 41- 56.Rafatyan, M., Asgari, A., Moradian, P. and Poladi, R., 2006, An analysis of the planning and management of temporary settlements in the reconstruction process after the crisis: Case study bam earthquake, 2nd International Conference on Natural Disaster Crisis Management, Tehran, PP. 41- 56.
Saadi Mesgari, M., Timoori, M. and Shurvarzi, H., 2011, The location hospitals using fuzzy GIS, Shahrnegar Bimonthly, Vol. 12, No. 54, PP. 33- 39.
Statistical Yearbook of Iran, 2011, West Azerbaijan Province Data and Information, The Statistical Center of Iran, Tehran.
Shahali, J. and Sanai, M., 2010, An analysis of urban street network in connection with the urban morphology, Journal of Human Geography, Vol. 2, No. 3, PP. 129- 144.
Shojaee Araghi, M., Tavalaee S. and Ziaeian. P. 2011, The optimal location for disaster management support databases using GIS Case Study of the 6th district of Tehran, Journal of Urban and Regional Studies and Research, Vol. 3, No. 10
Shams, M., Masuompoor Smakoosh, J., Saeedi, S. and Shahbazi, H., 2012, The earthquake disaster management in aging tissues in Kermanshah: Faizabad district, Preparation Geographic Journal, Vol. 4, No. 24, PP. 41- 66.
Shia, I., 2012, Introduction to the principles of urban planning, University of Science and Technology Publication.
Abdullahi, M. 2004, Crisis management in urban areas, Vol. 1, Iran's Municipalities administrators Publication.
Anberi, M, 2004, Evaluating the theoretical approaches in the management for disaster relief in Iran, Proceedings of 1st Conference Management Research and Rescue, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, PP. 88- 98.
Ghaffari, S. R., Shafaghi, S. and Salehi, N., 2010, Urban land use compatibility assessment using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making models, Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 1, No. 4, PP. 59- 76.
Kavoosi, E. and Mo'tamedi, M., 2010, Locate databases in earthquake disaster management using AHP model and GIS with emphasis on physical factors; Case study of Birjand, Logistics, Environment, Vol. 4, No. 44, PP. 1- 22.
Mashhadizadeh Dehaghani, N. 2008, An Analysis of the characteristics of urban planning at Iran,University of Science and Technology Center, Tehran.
Moshiri, R. and Maleki Nezam Abad, R., 2011, An analysis of land use planning with an emphasis on sustainable urban development; Case study: Miyandoaab, Encyclopedias Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, row 82, PP. 73- 87.
Consulting Engineers, 2006, Uremia Master Plan, Tarh and Amayesh consulting engineers.
Nayyerabady, H. and Barkhordari, S., 2011, The planning and locating of, temporary housing camps after a disaster, Journal of paya danesh, Vol. 1, No. 1, PP. 46- 54.
Vali Puri, M., Bahrami, M., Rahimabadi, A. and Karimi, O., 2014, Location of petrol stations Borujerd with GIS, Urban Planning and Landscape Geography Zagros Journal, Vol. 6, No. 20, PP. 161- 179.
غفوری آشتیانی، محسن، 1999، عملیات نجات و بازسازی در زلزله‌های اخیر ایران، مجلۀ بین‌المللی پیشگیری از بحران و مدیریت،سال هشتم، شمارة 1.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,797 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,368 |
||