پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,998,898 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,673,445 |
رویکرد ترکیبی FLinPreRa-FQFD برای اولویت‌بندی ویژگی‌ها و توانمندسازهای ناب-چابکی در صنایع غذایی و آشامیدنی استان قزوین | ||
| مدیریت صنعتی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 7، شماره 4، دی 1394، صفحه 673-696 اصل مقاله (653.63 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/imj.2015.57421 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| نیما اسفندیاری1؛ محمود مرادی* 2؛ محمدعلی ولی پور3 | ||
| 1کارشناس ارشد مدیریت صنعتی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف این پژوهش، اولویت‌بندی توانمندسازهای ناب- چابکی در صنایع غذایی و آشامیدنی استان قزوین با روش ترکیبی FLinPreRa-FQFD است، به‌طوری‌که امکان ارزیابی مستقیم تأثیر توانمندسازهای ناب- چابکی بر ویژگی‌های آن فراهم شود و با تعداد زوج مقایسة کمتر و حفظ سازگاری در اولویت‌بندی، به بهبود در تصمیم‌گیری منجر شود. در این پژوهش، بعد از مطالعة مبانی نظری و پیشینة موضوع ناب- چابکی، ویژگی‌ها و توانمندسازهای آن تعیین شدند و چارچوبی برای اولویت‌بندی این شاخص‌ها و همچنین مزایای رقابتی عمدة موجود در ادبیات پژوهش، طراحی شد. 38 شرکت از صنایع غذایی و آشامیدنی در استان قزوین، مبنای پژوهش قرار گرفتند. یافته‌های پژوهش بیانگر این است که مزیت رقابتی «هزینه» مهم‌ترین مزیت رقابتی در این صنعت است. ویژگی «حساسیت به بازار و مشتری» در صنایع غذایی و آشامیدنی با نظر خبرگان این صنعت، از مهم‌ترین ویژگی‌ها شناخته شد. همچنین، در میان توانمندسازها، توانمندساز «معرفی سریع محصولات جدید و کاهش زمان چرخة تولید» بالاترین وزن و اولویت را به‌‌‌‌دست آورد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تعمیم عملکرد کیفیت فازیQFD))؛ روابط ترجیحی کلامی فازی (FLinPreRa)؛ ناب- چابکی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The hybrid method of FLinPreRa-FQFD for prioritizing leagility attributes and enablers in Qazvin food and beverage industries | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Nima Esfandiari1؛ Mahmoud Moradi2؛ Mohammad Ali Valipour3 | ||
| 1MSc. Industrial Management, Management Department, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran | ||
| 2Associat Prof., Management Department, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Prof., Management Department, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this study is to prioritize leagility enablers in food and beverage industries in Qazvin Province with the hybrid method of FLinPreRa-FQFD. In doing so, it directly assessed the impact of leagility enablers on its attributes with fewer pairwise comparisons and yields consistent priority ranking which lead to improvement in decision-making. In this study, after reviewing literature and theoretical background of the leagility, its attributes and enablers are identified and a framework for prioritizing these indicators as well as major competitive advantage is designed. The study was based on 38 companies from the food and beverage industries, in Qazvin province. The findings indicate that competitive advantage "costs" is the most important competitive advantage in this industry. "Customer and market sensitiveness", is the most important attribute based on expert viewpoints. Also among the enablers, "rapid introduction of new products and production cycle time reduction" in achieved the highest weights and priorities. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| quality function deployment, Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relation, Leagility | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aly, N. A., Maytubby, V. J. & Elshennawy, A. K. (1990). Totalquality management: An approach & a case study, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 19(1): 111- 116. Belhe, U. & Kusiak, A. (1996). The house of quality in a design process, International Journal of Production Research, 34(8): 2119- 2131. Ben Naylor, J., Naim, M. M. & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1): 107- 118. Bottani, E. (2009). A fuzzy QFD approach to achieve agility, International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2): 380- 391. Bottani, E. (2010). Profile and enablers of agile companies: An empirical investigation, International Journal of Production Economics, 125(2): 251-261. Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, Fuzzy sets and Systems, 17(3): 233- 247. Charteris, W. (1993). Quality functiondeployment: A quality engineering technology for the food industry, International Journal of Dairy Technology, 46(1): 12- 21. Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets, Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1): 37- 44. Christopher, M. & Towill, D. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4): 235- 246. Crute, V., Ward, Y., Brown, S. & Graves, A. (2003). Implementing Lean in aerospace—challenging the assumptions and understanding the challenges, Technovation, 23(12): 917- 928. Farsijani, H. & Torabandeh, M. A. (2014). Explaining the role of transferring technology in fuzzy QFD for competitiveness of product (Case study: Iran transfo Rey corporation), Journal of Industrial Management, 5(2): 103- 120. (In Persian) Fynes, B., de Búrca, S. & Mangan, J. (2008). The effect of relationship characteristics on relationship quality and performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 111(1): 56- 69. Gunasekaran, A., Lai, K. h. & Edwin Cheng, T. (2008). Responsive supply chain: A competitive strategy in a networked economy, Omega, 36(4): 549-564. Gunasekaran, A. & Yusuf, Y. (2002). Agile manufacturing: Ataxonomy of strategic and technological imperatives, International Journal of Production Research, 40(6): 1357- 1385. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F. & Luque, M. (2004). Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research, 154(1): 98- 109. Hormozi, A. M. (2001). Agile manufacturing: The next logical step, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 8(2): 132- 143. Jafarnejad, A., Ahmadi, A. & Maleki, M. (2012). Measuring lean production using hybrid of ANP and DEMATEL techniques in the fuzzy condition, Journal of Industrial Management Studies, 8(20): 1- 25. (In Persian) Jin-Hai, L., Anderson, A. R. & Harrison, R. T. (2003). The evolution of agile manufacturing, Business Process Management Journal, 9(2): 170- 189. Kassaei, M., Farokh, M. & Talaei, H. R. (2013). Ranking and selecting agile providers for achieving enterprise agility by using ANP and DEMATEL: A case study for Bahman Motor Group in Iran, Journal of Industrial Management, 4(2): 135- 152. (In Persian) Lewis, M. A. (2000). Lean production and sustainable competitive advantage, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(8): 959- 978. Martinez, M. T., Fouletier, P., Park, K. H. & Favrel, J. (2001). Virtual enterprise–organisation, evolution and control, International Journal of Production Economics, 74(1): 225- 238. Maskell, B. (2001). The age of agile manufacturing, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(1): 5- 11. Matsui, Y. (2007). An empirical analysis of just-in-time production in Japanese manufacturing companies, International Journal of Production Economics, 108(1): 153- 164. Meredith, S. & Francis, D. (2000). Journey towards agility: The agile wheelexplored, The TQM Magazine, 12(2): 137- 143. Molavi, B., Esmaelian, M. & Ansari, R. (2013). Proposing a new approach for prioritization of organizational agility strategies using FTOPSIS and fuzzy inference system, Journal of Industrial Management, 5(1): 123- 138. (In Persian) Moran, J. W. & Cox, C. A. (1998). The QFD handbook, John Wiley & Sons. Naim, M. M. & Gosling, J. (2011). On leanness, agility and leagile supply chains, International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1): 342- 354. Ngai, E. W., Chau, D. C. & Chan, T. (2011). Information technology, operational and management competencies for supply chain agility: Findings from case studies, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(3): 232- 249. Noori, H. & Mavaddat, F. (1998). Enterprise integration: Issues and methods, International Journal of Production Research, 36(8): 2083- 2097. Offodile, O. F. & Abdel-Malek, L. L. (2002). The virtual manufacturing paradigm: The impact of IT/IS outsourcing on manufacturingstrategy, International Journal of Production Economics, 75(1): 147- 159. Philips, M., Sander, P. & Govers, C. (1994). Policy formulation by use of QFD techniques: A case study, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 11(5): 46- 58. Pimentel Claro, D. & Oliveira Claro, P. B. (2010). Collaborative buyer–supplier relationships and downstream information in marketing channels, Industrial Marketing Management, 39(2): 221- 228. Prince, J. & Kay, J. (2003). Combining lean and agile characteristics: Creation of virtual groups by enhanced production flow analysis, International Journal of Production Economics, 85(3): 305- 318. Ramík, J. & Korviny, P. (2010). Inconsistency of pair-wise comparison matrix with fuzzy elements based on geometric mean, Fuzzy sets and Systems, 161(11): 1604- 1613. Raub, S. & Von Wittich, D. (2004). Implementing knowledge management: Three strategies for effective CKOs, European Management Journal, 22(6): 714- 724. Readman, J., Squire, B., Bessant, J. & Brown, S. (2006). The application of agile manufacturing for customer value, Journal of Financial Transformation, 18, 133- 141. Sanders, N. R. & Premus, R. (2002). IT applications in supply chain organizations: A link between competitive priorities and organizational benefits, Journal of business logistics, 23(1): 65- 83. Sarkis, J. & Sundarraj, R. (2002). Evolution of brokering paradigms in e-commerce enabled manufacturing, International Journal of Production Economics, 75(1): 21- 31. Shafiee roodposhti, M. & Mirghafoori, H. (2012). Measuring the leanness degree of industrial firms using lean production hierarchical approach (Case: Yazd Tile and Ceramics industries), Journal of Industrial Management Studies, 9(22): 49- 74. (In Persian)
Shah, R. & Ward, P. T. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production, Journal of Operations Management, 25(4): 785- 805. Sharp, J., Irani, Z. & Desai, S. (1999). Working towards agile manufacturing in the UK industry, International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1): 155- 169. Tizroo, A., Azar, A., Ahmadi, R. & Rafie, M. (2012). Modeling agility of supply chain; Case Study: Zobahan Co, Journal of Industrial Management, 3(7): 17- 36. (In Persian) Van Laarhoven, P. & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1): 199- 227. Vázquez-Bustelo, D., Avella, L. & Fernández, E. (2007). Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes: Empirical test of an integrated agile manufacturingmodel, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(12): 1303- 1332. Vinodh, S. & Aravindraj, S. (2013). Evaluation of leagility in supply chains using fuzzy logic approach, International Journal of Production Research, 51(4): 1186- 1195. Vinodh, S. & Chintha, S. K. (2011). Leanness assessment using multi-grade fuzzy approach, International Journal of Production Research, 49(2): 431-445. Vinodh, S. & Devadasan, S. (2011). Twenty criteria based agility assessment using fuzzy logic approach, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9- 12): 1219- 1231. Vinodh, S. & Kumar Chintha, S. (2011). Application of fuzzy QFD for enabling leanness in a manufacturing organisation, International Journal of Production Research, 49(6): 1627- 1644. Wang, T. C. & Chen, Y. H. (2008). Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP, Information Sciences, 178(19): 3755- 3765. Yao, A. C. & Carlson, J. G. (2003). Agility and mixed-model furniture production, International Journal of Production Economics, 81- 82(1): 95- 102. Zarei, M., Fakhrzad, M. & Jamali Paghaleh, M. (2011). Food supply chain leanness using a developed QFD model, Journal of Food Engineering, 102(1): 25- 33. Zhang, Z. & Sharifi, H. (2000). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(4): 496- 513.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,947 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,208 |
||