تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,118,932 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,225,099 |
تغییرپذیری زمانی تولید رواناب تحت تأثیر شیب در خاکهای با بافت مختلف | ||
تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران | ||
مقاله 7، دوره 48، شماره 1، اردیبهشت 1396، صفحه 77-85 اصل مقاله (442.5 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijswr.2017.61342 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
مجتبی کرد* 1؛ علی رضا واعظی2؛ محمد حسین مهدیان3 | ||
1کارشناس شرکت مادر تخصصی مدیریت منابع آب ایران | ||
2دانشیار گروه خاکشناسی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه زنجان | ||
3استاد پژوهش سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، وزارت جهاد کشاورزی | ||
چکیده | ||
زمان آغاز و شدت تولید مشخصههایی از رواناب بوده که تحت تأثیر تغییرات خصوصیات فیزیکی خاک طی زمان بارندگی قرار میگیرند. شدت تغییرات زمانی این مشخصهها بسته به بافت خاک و شیب سطح میتواند تغییر کند. این پژوهش با هدف بررسی تغییرات زمانی تولید رواناب در خاکهای با بافت لومرسی، لوم و لومشنی در شیبهای 5، 10، 15، 25 و 30 درجه تحت باران شبیهسازی شده با شدت 40 میلیمتر در ساعت در شرایط آزمایشگاهی به انجام رسید. نتایج بدست آمده نشان داد که بافت خاک و شیب سطح اثر معنیداری بر زمان آغاز (05/0>P) و شدت تولید رواناب (05/0>P) دارد. زمان آغاز رواناب در خاک لوم رسی کمترین (16 دقیقه) و در خاک لوم شنی بیشترین (46 دقیقه) است. زمان آغاز رواناب به شدت تحت تأثیر شیب بوده و با افزایش شیب به صورت معنیداری کاهش یافت (01/0>P). روابطی معنیدار و منفی بین شیب و زمان آغاز رواناب در خاک لومرسی (86/0=2R)، لوم (86/0=2R) و لومشنی (98/0=2R) مشاهده شد (01/0>P). بیشترین تأثیر شیب بر کاهش زمان آغاز رواناب در خاک لوم شنی (63 درصد) و کمترین آن در خاک لوم رسی (28 درصد) مشاهده شد. روابطی معنیدار و مثبت بین شیب و شدت تولید رواناب در خاک لومرسی (89/0=2R)، لوم (95/0=2R) و لومشنی (94/0=2R) مشاهده شد (01/0>P). نقش شیب در افزایش تولید رواناب در خاک لوم رسی (19 درصد) بیشترین و در خاک لوم کمترین (15 درصد) است. الگوی تغییرات زمانی رواناب طی بارندگی تحت تأثیر بافت خاک و درجه شیب قرار گرفت. افزایش تدریجی رطوبت خاک و تخریب شدید ساختمان خاک دلایل افزایش رواناب در زمانهای اولیه بارندگی در خاک لوم رسی میباشد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
باران شبیهسازی شده؛ تخریب ساختمان خاک؛ زمان آغاز رواناب؛ شدت تولید رواناب | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Temporal variability of runoff production under slope gradients in different soil | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Mojtaba Kord1؛ Alireza Vaezi2؛ Mohammad Hosein Mahdian3 | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Initiation time and production rate are the major runoff characteristics which can be affected by the changes of soil physical properties during rainfall. Temporal variation of these characteristics could be controlled by soil texture and slope gradient. This study was carried out to investigate temporal variation of runoff in both different soil textures those of clay loam, loam, and sandy loam and various slopes (5, 10, 15, 25(and 30) under a 40 mm h-1simulated rainfall in the lab. Soil texture and slope steepness were the important factors influencing runoff initiation time (P<0.01) and production rate (P<0.01).Clay loam appeared the lowest runoff initiation time (16 min) whereas sandy loam showed the longest time (46 min). Runoff initiation time was negatively affected with increasing slope gradient. Significant relationships were observed between runoff initiation time and slope gradient in clay loam (R2=0.86), loam (R2=0.86) and sandy loam (R2= 0.98). The highest effect of slope gradient on decreasing runoff initiation time was in sandy loam (63%) while clay loam showed the lowest value (28%). Significant relationships were found between runoff production and slope in clay loam (R2=0.89), loam (R2=0.95) and sandy loam (R2= 0.94). Runoff temporal variation pattern were strongly varied among the soils in the slope gradients. Runoff steadily increased in clay loam during initial rainfall times. This temporal variation of runoff was due to increasing water content and disruption of structure. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Simulated rainfall, Runoff initiation time, Disruption of soil structure, Runoff production rate | ||
مراجع | ||
Adekalu, K.O., Olorunfemi, I.A. and Osunbitan, J.A. (2007).Grass mulching effect on infiltration, surface runoff and soil loss of three agricultural soils in Nigeria. Bioresource Technology, 98, 912–917. Amezketa, E. Singer, M.J. and Le Bissonnais.Y. (1996). Testing a new procedure for measuring water-stable aggregation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60 (5): 888-894. Arnaez, J., Lasanta T., Ruiz-Flano, P. and Ortigosa, L. (2007).Factors affecting runoff and erosion under simulated rainfall in Mediterranean vineyards. Soil and Tillage Research, 93(2):324-334. Asadi, H., Mahammodi, SH., and Heidari, A. (2007). Effect of surface sealing on sheet erosion dynamic, Proceedings of the 12th Soil Science Congress of Iran, Karaj, Iran, 1148-1149, (In Farsi). Assouline, S., and Ben-Hur, M. (2006). Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on the dynamics of interrill erosion during soil surface sealing. Catena, 66, 211-220. Chapman, H.D. and Pratt. P.F. (1978). Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. Division of agricultural sciences. University of California. United State of America. Cheng, Q., Ma, W., and Cai, Q. (2008). The relative importance of soil crust and slope angle in runoff and soil loss: A case study in the hilly areas of the Loess Plateau, North China. Geo. J. 71, 117-125. Duiker, S.W., Flanagan, D.C., and Lal, R. (2001). Erodibility and infiltration characteristics of fire major soils of southwest Spain. Catena, 45, 103-121. Dunjo, G., Pardini, G. and Gispert, M. (2004).The role of land use-land cover on runoff generation and sediment yield at a micorplot scale, in a small Mediterranean catchment. Journal of Arid Environment, 57, 99–116. Ekwue, E.I. and Harrilal A. (2010). Effect of soil type, peat, slope, compaction effort and their interactions on infiltration, runoff and raindrop erosion of some Trinidadian soils. Biosystem Engineering, 105,112 – 118. Fullen, M.A. and C.A. Booth. (2006). Grass ley set-aside and soil organic matter dynamics on sandy soils in Shropshire, UK, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms. 31: 570–578. Girmay, G., Sing, B. R., Nyssen, J., and Borrosen, T. (2009). Runoff and sediment associated nutrient losses under different land uses in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Journal of Hydrology, 376, 70-80. Gomez, J.A. and Nearing, M.A. (2005). Runoff and sediment losses from rough and smooth soil surfaces in a laboratory experiment. Catena, 59, 253-266. Grosh, J.L., and Jarrett A.R. (1994). Interril erosion and runoff on very steep slopes. Trans. ASAE, 37(4), 1127-1133. Huang, J., Wu, P., and Xining. Z. (2013). Effects of rainfall intensity, underlying surface and slope gradient on soil infiltration under simulated rainfall experiments, Catena, 104, 93-102. Jackson, M.L. 1967. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall of India, Private Limited. New Delhi. Jordan, A. and Martınez, Z.L. (2008). Soil loss and runoff rates on unpaved forest roads in southern Spain after simulated rainfall. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 913–919. Kato, H., Onda, Y., Tanaka, Y. and Asano, M. (2009). Field measurement of infiltration rate using an oscillating nozzle rainfall simulator in the cold, semiarid grassland of Mongolia. Catena, 76, 173–181. Kirkby, M. J. and Morgan, R. P. 2010.Soil erosion.John Wiley and Sons. New York. LiLi Mao, YuZhong Li,WeiPing Hao, Xu Rong Mei, Vincent F. Bralts, HaoRu Li,Rui Guo and TingWu Lei. (2016). An approximate point source method for soil infiltration process measurement. Journal of Geoderma, 264, 10-16. Mamedov, A. I., Levy, G. J., Shainberg, I. and Letey, J. (2001). Wetting rate and soil texture effect on infiltration rate and runoff. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 36, 1293-1305. Martinez, M. 1998. Factors Influencing Surface Runoff Generation in a Mediterranean Semi-arid Envirinment: Chicamo Watershed Spain. 12(5): 741-745. Martínez-Murillo, J.F., Nadal-Romero, E., Regüés, D., Cerdà, A. and Poesen, J. (2013). Soil erosion and hydrology of thewestern Mediterranean badlands throughout rainfall simulation experiments: a review. Catena, 106, 101–112. Mohammadi, M. A. and Kavian, A. (2010). Study of temporal variations of runoff and sediment at the plot scale (Case study: in the Moarref Khamesan basin), Proceedings of the 12th Soil Science Congress of Iran, 3-5 September, Tabriz, Iran, 1788- 1786, (In Farsi). Navas, N. (1993). Soil losses under simulated rainfall in semi-arid shrublands of the Ebro Valley, Spain. Soil Use and Manage, 9(4), 152-156. Nazif, W., Marzouk E.R., Perveen S., Crout N.M.J. and Young S.D. (2014). Zinc solubility and fractionation in cultivated calcareous soils irrigated with wastewater. Journal of Science of The Total Environment, 201, 310-319. Nelson, D.W., and Sommers, L.E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. pp: 539-579. In: A. L. Page (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2.ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. Nyssen, J., and Vermeersch, D. (2010). Slope aspect affects geomorphic dynamics of coal mining spoil heaps in Belgium. Geomorphology, 123(1-2), 109-121. Perez-Latorre, F.J., Castro, L.D., and Delgado, A. (2010). A comparison of two variable intensity rainfall simulators for runoff studies. Soil and Till. Res. 107, 11-16. Ragab, R., Bromley, J., Roiser, P., Cooper, J.D. and Gash J.H.C. (2003). Experimental study of water fluxes in a residential area: 1. Rainfall, roof runoff and evaporation: the effect of slope and aspect. Hydrological Processes, 17, 2409-2422. Rhoades, J.D. (1982). Methods of soil analysis, Agronomy. Cation exchange capacity..Noumber. 9, Part 2: chemical and mineralogical properties. 2nd ed., America.Society.Agronomy, Madison. WI, USA.149-157. Santos, F.L., Reis, J.L., Martins. O.C., Castanheria, N.L., and Serralherio, R.P. (2003). Comparative assessment of infiltration, runoff and erosion of sprinkler irrigation soils. Biosystems Engineering, 86(3),355-364. Seeger, M. (2007). Uncertainty of factors determining runoff and erosion processes as quantified by rainfall simulations. Catena, 71,56-67. Sheridan, G.J.,SoH.B. and LochR J. (2003). Improved slope adjustment function for soil erosion prediction. Aust. J. Soil Res. 41, 1489-1508. Sheridan, G., Noske, P., Lane, P., and Sherwin, C. (2008). Using rainfall simulation and site measurements to predict annual inter rill erodibility and phosphorus generation rates from unsealed forest roads: Validation against in-situ erosion measurements. Catena, 73, 49-62. Vaezi, A.R. (2014). Modeling runoff from semi-arid agricultural lands in northwest Iran. Pedospher, 24 (5), 595-604. Vaezi, A.R., Hasanzadeh, H. and Mohammadi, M.H. (2013). Runoff variations in the soil textures samples in the plot scale under the same rainfall events. Journal of Soil and Water Research, 44(3), 245-254, (In Farsi). Vahabi, J. and Mahdian M.H. (2008). Rainfall simulation for the study of the effects of efficient factors on runoff rate. Current Sci. 95, 1439-1445. Zhao, X., Huang, J., Gao, X., Wu, P. and Wang. J. (2014). Runoff features of pasture and crop slopes at different rainfall intensities, antecedent moisture contents and gradients on the Chinese Loess Plateau: A solution of rainfall simulation experiments. Catena, 119, 90-96. Yaron, B., Bresler, E. and Shalhevet, J. (1966). A method for uniform packing of soil columns. Soil Sci.101, 205-209. Yujie Wei., Xinliang Wu and Chongfa Cai. (2015). Splash erosion of clay–sand mixtures and its relationship with soil physical properties: The effects of particle size distribution on soil structure. Catena. 135, 254–262.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 984 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 952 |