پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,477 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,015 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 122,924,566 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 96,137,145 |
اثر دور آبیاری برعملکرد و اجزای عملکرد ارقام جدید ذرت دانه‌ای | ||
| تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران | ||
| مقاله 16، دوره 50، شماره 1، فروردین و اردیبهشت 1398، صفحه 189-199 اصل مقاله (712.09 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijswr.2018.255156.667880 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| نادر سلامتی* 1؛ امیرخسرو دانایی2 | ||
| 1استادیار پژوهش، بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران | ||
| 2امیرخسرو دانایی ، مربی پژوهش، بخش تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اهواز، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| به منظور بررسی تأثیر دور آبیاری بر کارایی مصرف آب، عملکرد، اجزای عملکرد و نیز تعیین مناسبترین رقم ذرت، آزمایشی به صورت کرتهای یک‌بار خردشده در قالب طرح آماری بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با چهار تکرار برای دو سال زراعی (1395-1393) در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی بهبهان اجرا گردید. فاکتور اصلی تنش خشکی شامل آبیاری بعد از 100 و 200 میلیمتر تبخیر از تشت کلاس A و فاکتور فرعی، رقم در چهار سطح شامل Karoon 701، S.C Mobin، S.C 704 و PH1 بودند. بعد از سبز شدن کامل مزرعه در روزهایی که مجموع تبخیر از تشت کلاس A به 100 و 200 میلیمتر میرسید، با نمونه‌برداری از خاک و تعیین رطوبت موجود جهت رساندن رطوبت خاک به ظرفیت مزرعه با توجه به مساحت هر کرت فرعی حجم آب آبیاری محاسبه و به وسیله کنتور به هر کرت فرعی داده شد. مقایسه میانگین تیمارهای دور آبیاری نشان داد که تیمار 100 میلیمتر تبخیر از تشت کلاس A در تمام صفات برتری معنی‌داری نسبت به تیمار 200 میلیمتر تبخیر از تشت کلاس A داشت. عملکرد ذرت در تیمار تنش (200 میلیمتر) نسبت به تیمار فاقد تنش (100 میلیمتر) کاهشی معادل 7/16 درصد را نشان داد. به ازای هر 1 سانتیمتر کاهش مصرف آب در هکتار، عملکرد ذرت 164 کیلوگرم در هکتار کاهش یافت. ظهور زودتر بلال در رقم PH1 موجب زودرس شدن رقم و کاهش طول دوره رشد آن شده است که منجر به کاهش مصرف آب و فرصت بیشتر برای تهیه زمین جهت کشت بعدی میشود. مقایسه میانگین صفات در اثرات متقابل آبیاری و رقم نشان داد که تیمار 100 میلیمتر تبخیر از تشت کلاس A و رقم PH1 به ترتیب با عملکرد دانه و کارایی مصرف آبی معادل 5/7143 کیلوگرم در هکتار و 353/1 کیلوگرم بر مترمکعب تیمار برتر باشد. نتایج ضریب همبستگی پیرسون نشان داد هرچه اجزای عملکرد افزایش یابند، عملکرد دانه و کارایی مصرف آب نیز بیشتر میشوند و برعکس. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| وزن هزار دانه؛ کارایی مصرف آب؛ تبخیر | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of irrigation interval on yield and yield components of New Corn Cultivars | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Nader Salamati1؛ Amirkhosro Danaie2 | ||
| 1Scientific Broad Member, Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ahvaz, Iran. | ||
| 2Member of Scientific Board, Seed and Plant lmprovement Department, Khuzestan. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In order to investigate the effect of irrigation interval on water use efficiency, yield, yield components and also determining the most suitable maize cultivar, a split plot experiment in a randomized completely block design was implemented with four replicates for two years (2014-2016) in Behbahan Agricultural Research Station. The main factor of drought stress was irrigation after 100 and 200 mm evaporation from class A pan and the sub factor was cultivars in four levels including Karoon 701, S.C. Mobin, S.C 704 and PH1. After the complete emergence of the field when the total evaporation from the class A reaches to 100 and 200 millimeters, the amount of irrigation water is calculated based on the deficit moisture content to field capacity and is applied to each sub-plot by a flowmeter. The comparison of mean irrigation treatments showed 100 mm evaporation from class A pan had a significant superiority in all properties than 200 mm evaporation from class A pan. The yield of corn in stress treatment (200 mm) showed a decrease of 16.7% as compared to the non-stress (100 mm) treatment. For each cm reduction in water consumption per hectare, the yield of corn decreased 164 kg per hectare. The earlier appearance of corn in PH1 variety of maize caused a premature cultivar and a reduction in the growth period which cause a less water consumption and a more opportunity for land preparation for the next cultivation. The comparison of traits mean in irrigation and cultivar interaction showed that the PH1 cultivar with 100 mm evaporation from class A pan was superior in terms of grain yield and water use efficiency which were equal to 7143.5 kg/ha and 1.353 kg/m3, respectively. The results of Pearson correlation coefficient showed by increasing the yield components of corn, the grain yield and water use efficiency increases and vice versa. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| 1000-grain weight, Water use efficiency, Evaporation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadi, J., Zainali Khaneghah, H., Rustami, M. And Chuckan, R. (2000). Evaluation of drought resistance in late commercial commercial corn hybrids. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, No. 4, pp. 891-899. (In Farsi) Afuni, M. and Rezaei Nejad, Y. (1999). Effect of Organic Materials on Chemical Properties and Corn Cultivation and Functioning, Abstract of Articles of the Sixth Iranian Soil Science Congress. P. 146. (In Farsi) Azarpanah, A., Alizadeh, O., Dehghanzadeh, H. and Zare, M. (2013). The effect of irrigation levels in various growth stages on morphological characteristics and yield components of Zea mays L. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. (14) 3: 1459-1447. Barzegari, M. (2017). Report on the introduction of maize variety: PH1. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. Safiabad Agricultural Research Center: 3-5. (In Farsi) Bigloi, M., Kafi Ghasemi, A., Javaherdashti, M. And Esfahani, M. (2013). The effect of irrigation regimes on yield and quality of corn (S C 704) in Rasht area. Journal of Agricultural Sciences of Iran. 3 (15): 206-196. (In Farsi) Cakir, R. (2004). Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research 89: 1-6. Choukan, R.(2015). Final report of Yield trial of promising late and medium maturing maize hybrids (final stage). Ministry OF Jahad – e- Agriculture. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute: 16. (In Farsi) Cooper, M., Van Eeuwijk, F., Chapman, S. C., Podlich, D. W. and Löffler, C. (2006). Genotype-by-environment interactions under water-limited conditions. In: Ribaut J. M. (Ed.). Drought adaptation in cereals. Binghamton, NY, The Haworth Press, Inc.pp: 51-96. Dehghanpoor, Z. (2013). Directions for planting, keeping and harvesting corn. Ministry OF Jahad – e- Agriculture. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute: 91-97. (In Farsi) Dehghanpour, Z. (2014). Technical instruction on planting, harvesting and harvesting of corn (grains and forage). Karaj, Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Research, Education and Promotion Institute, Seed and Plant Improvement Research Institute, Agricultural Education Publishing. (In Farsi) Edmeades, G.O., Bolanos, J., Banziger, M. and Ortega, A. (1998). Developing drought and low-nitrogen tolerant. Maize Symposium Abstracts.Dept. Agriculture, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072. Australia. Emam, Y. and Niknejad, M. (2004). An Introduction to the Physiology of Crop Yield. Shiraz University Press, 571 p.(In Farsi). Farshi, A.A., Shariati, M., Jarolahi, R., Ghaemi, M.R., Shahabi Far, M. and Tavalaie, Mir.M. (2007). Estimated Water Requirements for Plants. Agricultural Education Publishing, Agricultural Research, Education and Promotion Organization, Soil and Water Research Institute. (In Farsi) Grant, R.F., Jackson, B.C., Kiniry, J.R. and Arikin, G.F. (1989). Water deficit timing effects on yield Components in maize. Agronomy Journal. 81: 61-65. Hall, A.J.L., Emcoff, J.H., and Trapani, N. (1981). Water stress before and during flowering in maize and its effects on yield its Components, and Their determinants. Maydica 26: 19-38. Herero, M. P. and Johnson, R. R. (1981). Drought stress and its effects on maize reproductivte systems. Crop Science. 21: 105-110. Howell, T.A., Tock, J.A., Schneider, A.D and Evett, S.R. (1998). Evapotranspiration, yield and water use efficiency of corn hybrids differing in maturity. Agronomy Journal. 90: 3-9. Kang, S.Z., Zhang, L., Liang ,Y.L., Hu, X.T., Cai, H.J. and Gu, B.J. (2002). Effects of limited irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in the Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural Water Management. 55: 203-216. Karlen, D.M. and Camp, C.R.. (1985). Row spacing plant population, and water management effect on corn in the in the Atlanta coastal plain. Agronomy Journal. 77:393-398. Mohammadai, H., Soleymani, A. and Shams, M. (2012). Evaluation of Drought Stress Effects on Yield Components and Seed Yield of Three Maize Cultivars (Zea mays L.) in Isfahan region. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, (19) 4: 1436-1439. Mostafavi, Kh., Shoahosseini, M. and Sadeghi Geive, H. (2011). Multivariate analysis of variation among traits of corn hybrids traits under drought stress. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 1 (7): 416-422. Musick,J.T., and D.A.Dusek . (1980). Irrigated corn yield response to water. Transaction of the ASAE, 23(1):92-98. Nesmith, D.S. and Ritchie, J.T. (1992). Short and long term responses of corn to a pre-anthesis soil water deficit Agronomy Journal. 84: 106-113. Panday, R.K., Marienville, J.W. and Adum, A. (2000). Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effect on maize in a sahelian environment. I. Grain yield components. Agricultural water management. 46: 1-13. Parvizi, Y. and Nabati, A. (2004). Effect of irrigation intervals and manure on water use efficiency and quantitative and qualitative yield of corn. Research and construction. No. 63. 21-29. Richards, R.A., Rebtzke, G.J., Condon, A.G. and van Herwaarden, A. F. (2002). Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 42: 111-121. Shoaa Hossaini, S.M., Babaeeyan, N. and Farsi, M. (2001). Effect of drought stress on yield and its components in some corn hybrids using causality analysis. Master's thesis, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Mazandaran University, 117 p. (In Farsi) Sing, N.P. and Sinka, S.K. (1997). Water use efficiency in crop production. In: Water requirement and irrigation management of crops in India, ed. Indian Agricultural Research Institute. New Delhi .Water technology center: 289-335. Song, Y., Qu, C., Birch, S., Doherty, A. and Hanan, J. (2010). Analysis and modelling of the effects of water stress on maize growth and yield in dryland conditions. Plant Production Science. 13 (2): 199-208. Westgate, M.E. (1994). Water statues and development of the maize endosperm and embryo during drought stress. Crop science 34:76-83. Zarabi, M., Alahdadi, I., Akbari, G. A. and Akbari, G. A. (2011). A study on the effects of different biofertilizer combinations on yield, its componentsand growth indices of corn (Zea mays L.) under drought stress condition. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 6 (3): 681-685. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 415 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 347 |
||