تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,115,031 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,218,915 |
تقویت یادگیری خودتنظیمی زبانآموزان ایرانی: بررسی تاثیر خودسنجی و همسالسنجی در مهارت نگارش در زبان دوم | ||
پژوهشهای زبانشناختی در زبانهای خارجی | ||
مقاله 6، دوره 9، شماره 1، اردیبهشت 1398، صفحه 123-146 اصل مقاله (287.89 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی(عادی) | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jflr.2019.249081.446 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
جلیل فتحی1؛ محسن شیرازی زاده* 2 | ||
1گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران | ||
2دانشگاه الزهرا | ||
چکیده | ||
خود-تنظیمی به عنوان توانایی افراد در تنظیم و هدایت احساسات، عواطف، افکار و رفتارخود و یادگیری مفهومی است که در روانشناسی تربیتی و آموزش توجه زیادی را به خود جلب کرده است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی اثربخشی دو روش خودسنجی و همسالسنجی در یک دوره آموزش مهارت نوشتاری در بهبود یادگیری خود-تنظیمی بوده است. بدین منظورهفتاد و نه زبان آموز با مهارت زبانی متوسط در قالب سه کلاس دست نخورده در این مطالعه شرکت نمودند. یکی از کلاسها به عنوان گروه خودسنجی، کلاس دیگر گروه همسالسنجی و گروه سوم هم به عنوان گروه کنترل که در آن سنجش توسط خود معلم انجام می شد در نظر گرفته شد. پس از انجام مداخله و آموزش مربوط به هر گروه وبا توجه به نمرات پیش آزمون و پس آزمون هر سه گروه در آزمون یادگیری خود-تنظیمی، نتایج تحلیل کوواریانس نشان داد که خود-سنجی و همسالسنجی تاثیر مثبتی بر افزایش میزان یادگیری خودتنظیمی داشتند. بررسی بیشتر داده ها بیانگر این بود که تفاوت معنی داری بین گروه خودسنجی و همسالسنجی وجودنداشت. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
خودسنجی؛ همسال-سنجی؛ خودتنظیمی؛ مهارت نوشتاریT | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Fostering Self-regulated Learning of Iranian EFL Students: An investigation of the Effect of Self and Peer Assessment in L2 Writing | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Jalil Fathi1؛ Mohsen Shirazizadeh2 | ||
1English department, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
2English Department, Alzahra University | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effectiveness of practicing self- and peer-assessment in a course of writing in enhancing self-regulated learning. In so doing, seventy nine intermediate Iranian EFL students in the form of three intact classes at Islamic Azad University participated in this study. One of the classes was considered as the self-assessment group, the other class was assigned to peer-assessment group and the third class was assigned as the control group of the study. After the conduction of the study and the related intervention and treatment in each group, the scores of the students in the three groups on the pre-test and post-test of self-regulated learning were taken into account. The analyses of covariance revealed that self-assessment and peer-assessment practices had a positive impact on students' level of self-regulated learning . Further analysis indicated that there was not statistically significant difference between the self-assessment and peer-assessment groups in terms of self-regulation. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Self-assessment, Peer-assessment, Self-regulated Learning | ||
مراجع | ||
-6 منابع Allen, D. (2004). Oxford placement test 1. Oxford: OUP. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260– 267. Anderson, J., R. (1992). “Automaticity and the ACT theory”. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 165–180. Andrade, H. & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-Assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (2), 159-181. Ary, D., Jacobs, C., & Razavieh, A. (1990). Introduction to research in education. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Azarnoosh, M. (2013). Peer assessment in an EFL context: attitudes and friendship bias. Language Testing in Asia, 3 (11), 1-10. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370. Bannert, M. (2009). Promoting self-regulated learning through prompts. Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie, 23(2), 139–145, http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652. 23.2.139. Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive andmetacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 564–577, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09. 007. Birjandi, P., & Sayyari, M. (2010). Self-assessment and peer-assessment: A comparative study of their effects on writing performance and rating accuracy. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 23-45. Blanche, P. (1988). Self-assessment of foreign language skills: Implications for teachers and researchers. RELC Journal, 19 (1), 75-96. تقویت یادگیری خودتنظیمی زبان آموزان ایرانی: بررسی تاثیر خودسنجی و همسالسنجی در مهارت نگارش در زبان دوم 143 Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231. Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-referenced language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 653-675. Conway, R., & Kember, D. (1993). Peer assessment of an individual’s contribution to a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 45-54. Davidson, F., & Henning, G. (1985). A self-rating scale of English proficiency: Rasch scalar analysis of items and rating categories. Language Testing, 2,164-79 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press. DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 78, 273–284. Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Language Teaching Library. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, London. Do¨rnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In: Doughty, C.J., Long, M.H. (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 589-630). Blackwell: OUP. Dweck, C., & Molden, D. (2005). Self theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 122–140). New York: The Guilford Press. Elliot, A. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York: The Guilford Press. Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: The Falmer Press. Goldfinch, J. M., & Raeside, R. (1990). Development of peer assessment techniques. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 15(3), 210-225. 144 پژوهش های زبانشناختی در زبان های خارجی، دورة 9، شمارة 1، فروردین 1398 Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Brookline, MA: Brookline Books. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(4), 251-262. Heilenmann, K. L. (1990). Self-assessment of second language ability: The role of response effects. Language Testing, 7, 174-201. Hughes, AR. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: CUP. Janssen-van Dieten, A. (1989). The development of a test of Dutch as a second language: The validity of self-assessments by inexperienced subjects. Language Testing, 6, 30- 46. Kramarski, B., & Dudai, V. (2009). Group-metacognitive support for online inquiry in mathematics with differential self-questioning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4), 377–404. Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009). Three metacognitive approaches to training preservice teachers in different learning phases of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(5), 465–485. Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434–447. Magno, C. (2010). Assessing academic self-regulated learning among Filipino college students: the factor structure and item fit. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 5(1), 61-73. Natri, T. (2007). Active learnership in continuous self- and peer-evaluation. In A. Barfield & S.H. Brown (Eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education: Inquiry and innovation (pp. 108–120). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Noels, K. (2001). New orientations in language motivation: Towards a model of intrinsic, extrinsic and integrative orientations and motivation. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 43–68). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 259-271. O’Malley, J.M., Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. O’Leary, C. (2007). Should learner autonomy be assessed? Proceedings of the Independent Learning Association, Japan. تقویت یادگیری خودتنظیمی زبان آموزان ایرانی: بررسی تاثیر خودسنجی و همسالسنجی در مهارت نگارش در زبان دوم 145 Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Retrieved March 4, 2013, fromhttp://hyxy.nankai.edu.cn/jingpinke/buchongyuedu/learning% 20strategies%20by%20 Oxford.pdf. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). The Regents of the University of Michigan. Saarni, C. (2006). Emotion regulation and personality development in childhood. In D. K. Mroczek & T.D. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 245– 262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Saito, H. (2008). EFL classroom peer assessment: training effects on rating and commenting. Language Testing, 25, 553–581. Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Sambell, A. (2006). Supporting diverse students: developing learner autonomy via assessment, in C. Bryan, & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education (pp. 158-168). NewYork: Routledge. Sanders, B. D. (2010). The effect of explicit instruction on the writing attitude and ability of fourth grade writers. (Unpublished master’s thesis). California State University, Sacramento, US. Schendel, E. & O’Neill P. (1999). Exploring the theories and consequences of selfassessment through ethical inquiry. Assessing writing, 6(2), 199-227. Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp.125–149). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Selfefficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631-649). London: Elsevier Schunk, D., Pintrich, P., & Meece, J. (2007). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. New York: The Guilford Press. Spiller, D. (2012). Assessment Matters: Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment. Wāhanga Whakapakari Ako, New Zealand. Ushioda, E. (2001). Language learning at university: Exploring the role of motivational thinking. In Z.Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 93–125). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. 146 پژوهش های زبانشناختی در زبان های خارجی، دورة 9، شمارة 1، فروردین 1398 Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 532-548. Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: CUP Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Williams, M., Burden, R., & Al-Bahama, S. (2001). Making sense of success and failure: The role of the individual in motivation theory. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 171–184). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 30, 173-188. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19). New York: Guilford Press. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-35). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Developing of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628. Zumbrunn, S. (2010). Nurturing young students’ writing knowledge, self regulation, attitudes, and self-efficacy: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska, US. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,175 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 777 |