پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,116,311 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,220,784 |
ارزیابی تیغهی باریک خاکورز به منظور بهبود عملکرد خاکورز مرکب | ||
| مهندسی بیوسیستم ایران | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 50، شماره 2، شهریور 1398، صفحه 253-266 اصل مقاله (1.62 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijbse.2019.253879.665046 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زینب عظیمی زاده1؛ سیدحسین کارپرورفرد* 2؛ هادی عظیمی نژادیان3 | ||
| 1گروه مهندسی مکانیک بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شیراز. ایران. | ||
| 2گروه مهندسی مکانیک بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شیراز. شیراز، ایران. | ||
| 3گروه مهندسی مکانیک بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این پژوهش از طرح جدید یک تیغهی باریک خاکورز با زاویه تمایل جانبی 10 درجه به منظور امکانسنجی حذف باله از آن و مقایسه با تیغه شاهد استفاده شد. عوامل آزمایشی شامل تیغه (تیغه با زاویه تمایل جانبی 10 درجه، تیغه با زاویه تمایل جانبی 10 درجه با باله و تیغه شاهد)، عمق شخم در سه سطح 20،15 و 25 سانتیمتر و سرعت پیشروی در دو سطح 3 و 6 کیلومتر بر ساعتبودند. نیروی مقاومت کششی، مقاومت ویژه، سطح بهم خوردگی خاک و مصرف سوختبه عنوان صفات اندازهگیری شده در نظر گرفته شدند. نتایج نشان داد، نیروی مقاومت کششی تیغههای زاویه‌دار با و بدون باله نسبت به تیغه شاهد به طور معنیدار افزایش یافت. سطح بهم خوردگی خاک در تیغه با زاویه تمایل جانبی 10 درجه با و بدون باله نسبت به تیغه شاهد کاهش یافت. اثر نوع تیغه بر مقاومت ویژه معنیدار بود. مقاومت ویژه در تیغه 10 درجه با باله و عمق 25 سانتیمتری بیشترین مقدار و در تیغه شاهد و عمق 15 سانتیمتری دارای کمترین مقدار بود. اثر نوع تیغه، عمق شخم و سرعت پیشروی و همچنین برهم کنش این سه عامل بر مصرف سوخت در سطح احتمال یک درصد معنیدار شدند. مقدار مصرف سوخت در تیغه شاهد و 10 درجه با هم تفاوت معنیداری نداشت. بر اساس نتایج رگرسیونی حاصله عمق بهینه برای تیغه باریک خاکورز با زاویه تمایل جانبی 10 درجه، 02/17 سانتیمتر و سرعت پیشروی بهینه 6/3 کیلومتر بر ساعت پیشنهاد گردید. In this study, a new design of a narrow blade tillage with lateral tilt angle 10 degrees was used to study the possibility of removing its wingand compare it with the control blade. Three blades (blade with lateral tilt angles of 10 degrees, blade tilt angle of 10 degrees equipped with wing and blade control), plow depth in three levels, 20,15 and 25 cm and two levels of forward speeds 3 and 6 km/hr were the experimental factors. Measured characteristics were draft force, specific draft, soil surface disturbance and fuel consumption. The results showed that the draft force of the blade equipped with angle, with wing and without wing was significantly increased compared to the control blade. Soil surface disturbance in the blade with lateral tilt angle 10 degrees with and without wing decreased compared to the control blade. The effect of the bladetype on specific draft was significant. Specific draft in the blade 10 degrees with wing and in depth of 25 cm and the control blade in depth of 15 cm had the highest and lowest value respectively. The effect of the blade type, plow depth and forward speed and also the interaction of these three factors on fuel consumption in probability level %1 were significant. There was no significantly different between amount of fuel consumption in the control blade and the blade equipped with lateral tilt angle. Based on the results of regression analysis, optimum depth and forward speed for narrow blade equipped with lateral tilt angle 10 degrees were proposed 17/02 cm and 3/6km / h, respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تیغه خاکورز؛ عمق شخم؛ سرعت شخم؛ مقاومت کششی؛ مصرف سوخت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of a Narrow Blade to Improving the Combined Tillage performence | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| zeynab azimi zadeh1؛ Seyed Hossein Karparvarfard2؛ hadi azimi nejadian3 | ||
| 1Biosystems Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| 2Biosystems Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| 3Biosystems Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In this study, a new design of a narrow blade tillage with lateral tilt angle 10 degrees was used to study the possibility of removing its wing and compare it with the control blade. Three blades (blade with lateral tilt angles of 10 degrees, blade tilt angle of 10 degrees equipped with wing and blade control), plow depth in three levels, 20,15 and 25 cm and two levels of forward speeds 3 and 6 km/hr were the experimental factors. Measured characteristics were draft force, specific draft, soil surface disturbance and fuel consumption. The results showed that the draft force of the blade equipped with angle, with wing and without wing was significantly increased compared to the control blade. Soil surface disturbance in the blade with lateral tilt angle 10 degrees with and without wing decreased compared to the control blade. The effect of the blade type on specific draft was significant. Specific draft in the blade 10 degrees with wing and in depth of 25 cm and the control blade in depth of 15 cm had the highest and lowest value respectively. The effect of the blade type, plow depth and forward speed and also the interaction of these three factors on fuel consumption in probability level %1 were significant. There was no significantly different between amount of fuel consumption in the control blade and the blade equipped with lateral tilt angle. Based on the results of regression analysis, optimum depth and forward speed for narrow blade equipped with lateral tilt angle 10 degrees were proposed 17/02 cm and 3/6km / h, respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Tillage blade, Plow depth, Plow speed, draft, Fuel consumption | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbaspour-Fard, M. H., Hoseini, S. A., Aghkhani, M. H., & Sharifi, A. (2014). The behavior of tillage tools with acute and obtuse lift angles. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(1), 44-51. Arvidsson, J., & Hillerström, O. (2010). Specific draught, soil fragmentation and straw incorporation for different tine and share types. Soil & Tillage Research, 110, 154-160. Busari, M. A., Kukal, S. S., Kaur, A., Bhatt, R., & Dulazi, A. A. (2015). Conservation tillage impacts on soil, crop and the environment. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 3(2), 119-129. Eshaghbagi, A., Tabatabaeifar, A., Kayhani, A., Raoufat, M.H. (2004). The effect of depth and angle of attack on the pull resistance of the subsoiler with a bent blade. Journal of Agricultural Science of Iran. Volume 36, Number 4, (1045-1052). (In Farsi) Godwin, R. J. (2007). A review of the effect of implement geometry on soil failure and implement forces. Soil & Tillage Research, 97, 331-340. Godwin, R. J., & Spoor, G. (1977). Soil failure with narrow tines. Agricultural Engineering Research, 22, 213-228. Hemat, A., Mosadeghi, M. (2000). Tillage for crop production in low rainfall areas. Tehran. Agricultural Research and Training Organization. (In Farsi). Jafari, R., Raoufat, M. H., & Hashjin, T. T. (2008). Soil-Bin Performance of a Modified Bent Leg Plow. Applied engineering in agriculture, 24(3), 301-307. Jalali, A., Mahmoudi, A., Valizadeh, M., Skandari., I. (2014). The effect of conservation tillage forward speed and depth on farm fuel consumption. Journal of Agricultural Machinery. Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 325-335. Khalilian, A., Garner, T. H., Musen, H. L., Dodd, R. B., & Hale, S. A. (1988). Energy for conservation tillage in Coastal Plain soils. Transactions of the ASAE, 31(5), 1333-1337. Loghavi, M., Ashrafi zade, S.R. (1997). Pull resistance, special resistance and power requirements for chisel at different levels of soil moisture and plowing depth. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. No 2. p 85- 95. (In Farsi). Manuwa, S. I. (2009). Performance evaluation of tillage tines operating under different depths in a sandy clay loam soil. Soil and tillage research, 103(2), 399-405. McKyes, E., & Maswaure, J. (1997). Effect of design parameters of flat tillage tools on loosening of a clay soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 43(3-4), 195-204. Mouazen, A. M., & Nemenyi, M. (1999). Tillage tool design by the finite element method: Part 1. finite element modelling of soil plastic behaviour. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 72(1), 37-51. Ranjbarian, S., Askari, M., & Jannatkhah, J. (2017). Performance of tractor and tillage implements in clay soil. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 16(2), 154-162. Row, R., & Barnes, K. (1961). Influence of speed on elements of draft of a tillage tool. Transactions of the ASAE, 4, 55-57. Salar, M.R., Eshaghbagi, A., & Hemmat, A. (2013). Soil loosening characteristics of a dual bent blade subsurface tillage implement. Soil & Tillage Research, 134, 17-24. Shao, Y., Xie, Y., Wang, C., Yue, J., Yao, Y., Li, X., Liu, W., Zhu, Y., & Guo, T. (2016). Effects of different soil conservation tillage approaches on soil nutrients, water use and wheat-maize yield in rainfed dry-land regions of North China. European Journal of Agronomy, 81, 37-45. Soltani ghalegughi, A., Loghavi, M. (2007). The effect of axial load and pull load on the landing efficiency and fuel consumption of two heavy-duty tractors in the semi mounted moldboard plow. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. No 40, p 125-135. Summers, J. D., Khalilian, A., & Batchelder, D.G. (1986). Draft relationships for primary tillage in Oklahama soils. Transactions of the ASAE, 29(1),37-39. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 430 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 403 |
||