پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,113,564 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,217,338 |
تأثیر مدیریت آبیاری و الگوی کشت بر شاخص‌های کیفیت خاک (مطالعه موردی: عرصه‌های کشاورزی سمنان) | ||
| تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران | ||
| دوره 51، شماره 9، آذر 1399، صفحه 2323-2335 اصل مقاله (1.12 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijswr.2020.302192.668601 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| کورش کمالی* 1؛ غلامرضا زهتابیان2؛ طیبه مصباح زاده3؛ محمود عرب خدری4؛ حسین شهاب آرخازلو5؛ علیرضا مقدم نیا6 | ||
| 1مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گیلان | ||
| 2استاد، گروه احیاء مناطق خشک و کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار، گروه احیاء مناطق خشک و کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران | ||
| 4دانشیار، پژوهشکده حفاظت خاک و آبخیزداری، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 5استادیار، گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| 6دانشیار، گروه احیاء مناطق خشک و کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| کیفیت خاک عاملی است که در اثر تغییر در ویژگیهای ذاتی خاک و چگونگی مدیریت حاکم بر آن تغییر میکند. به‌منظور ارزیابی کیفیت خاک متأثر از نوع کاربری، مدیریت‌های مختلف آبیاری، و نوع کشت در منطقه سمنان، از شاخص کیفیت تجمعی و شاخص کیفیت نمرو استفاده شد. با حفر و تشریح 13 خاکرخ در پنج مزرعه و باغ منتخب و نمونه‌برداری از افق‌های سطحی و متوسط عمقی، 14ویژگی مؤثر در کیفیت خاک تعیین و دو شاخص یادشده محاسبه گردیدند. نتایج نشان داد که خاک‌های اراضی زراعی در لایه‌های سطحی دارای درجه کیفیت II و III و خاک‌های اراضی باغی در لایه‌های سطحی و متوسط عمقی به دلیل عدم تکامل پروفیلی، پایین‌بودن کربن آلی و بالابودن میزان شوری دارای درجه کیفیت IV هستند. بالاترین میانگین شاخص‌های کیفیت خاک لایه سطحی به یونجه (آبیاری غرقابی) با 67/0 اختصاص یافت؛ پس از آن جو (آبیاری بارانی) با 59/0، باغ زیتون (آبیاری قطره‌ای) با 39/0 و باغ زیتون (آبیاری غرقابی) با 32/0 قرار گرفتند. این یافته اثر مثبت محصولات پوششی در احیای خاک‌های این منطقه را نشان داد. تأثیر مدیریت آبیاری بر شاخص‌های کیفیت خاک حاکی از آن است که نوع سامانه آبیاری به تنهایی نتوانسته است تفاوت معنی‌داری در کیفیت خاک ایجاد نماید. به‌طوری‌که آبیاری غرقابی در یونجه و باغ زیتون به ترتیب بالاترین و پایینترین شاخص کیفیت را داشت. همچنین در باغ زیتون با آبیاری‌های قطره‌ای و غرقابی، تفاوت معنی‌داری در شاخص‌های کیفیت خاک مشاهده نشد. بهره‌گیری از شاخص‌های مذکور این امکان را به مجریان بخش‌های کشاورزی می‌دهد تا در انتخاب استراتژی‌های مدیریتی و نظارت بر تغییرات کیفیت خاک تصمیم‌گیری نمایند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| احیای سرزمین؛ کشاورزی پایدار؛ شاخص کیفیت تجمعی؛ شاخص کیفیت نمرو | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effect of Irrigation Management and Cultivation pattern on Soil Quality Indices (Case study: Agriculture fields of Semnan) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Kourosh kamali1؛ Gholam Reza Zehtabian2؛ Tayyebeh Mesbahzadeh3؛ Mahmood Arabkhedri4؛ Hossayin Shahab Arkhazlo5؛ Alireza Moghaddam Nia6 | ||
| 11. Member of scientific board, Gilan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Rasht, | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant professor, Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
| 4Associate professor, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 5Assistant professor, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran | ||
| 6Associate Professor, Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Soil quality, as a factor, is changing due to variation of soil inherent characteristics and the type of management practices on the soil. Integrated Quality Index and Nemero Quality Index were applied to evaluate the influence of land use types, different irrigation managements, and types of cultivated products on the soil quality in Semnan region. After describing 13 soil profiles in five selected crop fields and orchards, soil samples were taken from different horizons and 14 properties efective on the soil quality were determined and the proposed indecs were calculated. The results showed that the quality of top layers of agricultural lands are classified as II and III degree, while the top layer and sublayer of garden lands are classified as IV degree due to lack of profile evolution, low organic carbon and high salinity. The highest average soil quality indices were assigned to alfalfa (flood irrigation) with 0.67; followed by barley (sprinkler irrigation) with 0.59, olive orchard (drip irrigation) with 0.39 and olive orchard (flood irrigation) with 0.32. This finding indicates the positive effect of cover crops on land reclamation of Semnan region. The effect of irrigation system on soil quality indices did not show any significant difference among them, as the flood irrigation in alfalfa and olive farms showed the highest and the lowest soil quality indecs, respectively. Also, there was no significant difference in soil quality of olive orchards under drip irrigation vs. flood irrigation. Soil quality indecs make opportunity to agricultural managers to choose appropriate management strategies and monitoring the changes in the soil quality. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Combating desertification, Sustainable agriculture, Integrated Quality Index, Nemoro Quality Index | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alizadeh, H.A., Liaghat, A. and Sohrabi, T. (2014). Assessing pressurized irrigation systems development scenarios on groundwater resources using system dynamics modeling, Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 3(4), 1-15. (In Farsi) Andrews, S.S., Flora, C.B., and Mitchell, J.P. (2002). A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in northern California, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 90, 25-45. Aparicio, V., and J.L. Costa, (2007). Soil quality indicators under continuous cropping systems in the Argentinean pampas. Soil and Tillage Research. 96:155-165. Askari, M. S., and Holden, N. M. (2014). Indices for quantitative evaluation of soil quality under grassland management. Geoderma, 230, 131-142. Azarneshan, S., Khormali, F., Sarmadian, F., Kiani, F., and Eftekhari, K. (2018). Soil quality evaluation of semi-arid and arid lands in Qazvin Plain, Iran, Journal of Water and Soil, 32(2): 359-374. (In Farsi) Barancikova, G., Halas, J., Guttekova, M., Makovnikova, J., Navakova, M., Skalsky, R., and Tarasovicova. (2010). Application of RothC model to predict soil organic carbon stock on agricultural soils of Slovakia. Soil and Water Research Journal 5(1): 1–9. Burea of Modern Irrigation Systems Implementation (2019). Five-year report of modern irrigation systems development plan (2012-2018), Water and Soil Deputy Publications, Ministry of Agriculture- Jahad. (In Farsi) Carter, M.T., E. G. Gregorich, D.W.Anderson, J.W. Doran, H.H. Janzen and F.J. Pierce. (1997). Concepts of soil quality and their significance, PP. 1020. In: E. G. Gregorich, M.R. Carter (Eds.), Soil Quality for crop production and Ecosystem Health, Elsevier, Amsterdan. De Paul Obade, V., & Lal, R. (2014). Soil quality evaluation under different land management practices. Environmental earth sciences, 72(11), 4531-4549. Dexter AR. (2004). Soil physical quality, Part III. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and general conclusions about Stheory. Geoderma, 120: 227-239. Doran, J.W. and B.T. parkin. (1994). Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran, J.W., and et al.(Eds.), Defining soil quality for a sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of American, Inc., Madison, WI, USA, Special Publication, 35: 3-21. Doran, J. W. and A. J. Jones. (1996) Quantitative indicators of Soil quality: a minimum data set. Pp. 2-25. In: Doran, J.W. and A. J. Jones. Eds. Methods for assessing soil quality. Soil Science Society of American Special Publication, vol. 49. Soil Science Society of American, Inc., Madison,WI, USA. Gee, G.W., and J.M. Bauder. (1986). Partical-size analysis. Pp 383-411. In: Page, A. L., and et al (Eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agronomy Monogroph No. 9 (2nd edition), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. Ghaemi, M., Astaraei, A., Sanaeinejad, S.H., Nassiri Mahalati, M., and Emami, H. (2014) Evaluation of Maize Yield Variability Based on Soil Properties and Principal Component analysis of east of mashhad-Iran, Journal of Water and Soil, 27(4): 463-473. Ghahramanpoor, R., Gorji, M., Pourbabaee, A.A., Farahbakhsh, M. (2018). Investigating the Effects of Conservation and Reduced Tillage Systems on Soil Quality Indices, Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research (IJSWR), 49 (6): 1355-1364. (In Farsi) Han, W.J., and Q.T. Wu. (1994). A primary approach on the quantitative assessment of soil quality . Chinese Journal of Soil Science. 25:245–247. Herrick, J. E., Brown, J. R., Tugel, A. J., Shaver, P. L., and Havstad, K. M. (2002). Application of soil quality to monitoring and management. Agronomy Journal, 94(1): 3-11. Islamic Republic of Iran Meteorological Organization (IRIMO). (2018). Meteorological Administration of Semnan province, Summary of statistics of Semnan province's meteorological station. (In Farsi) Karlen, D. L., Mausbach, M. J., Doran, J. W., Cline, R. G., Harris, R. F., and Schuman, G. E. (1997). Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation (a guest editorial). Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61(1): 4-10. Karlen, D. L., & Stott, D. E. (1994). A framework for evaluating physical and chemical indicators of soil quality. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment, (definingsoilqua), 53-72. Kemper, W.D., and Rosenau, R.C. (1986). Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part a: Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agronomy Monograph No. 9. American Society of Agronomy. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI:425–442. Khosravi. H, Zehtabian. G.H, Azareh A, and Eskandari H. (2018). Evaluating and comparing the effects of agricultural activities on soil properties (Case Study: Khatam city). Journal of Rangeland, 12(2), 232-241. Kouchaki, A., Hasheminia, S.M., and Ghahraman, N. (1997). Salt water utilization in sustainable agriculture, Mashhad University Jihad, 236p. Liu, Z., Zhou, W., Shen, J., Li, S., He, P. and Liang, G. (2014). Soil quality assessment of Albic soils with different productivities for eastern China. Soil and Tillage Research, 140, 74-81. Nori, N., Rostaminia, M., Keshavarzi, A., and Rahmani, A. (2019). Quantitative Evaluation and Zoning of Spatial Distribution of Soil Quality Index in Some Parts of Arid and Semi-Arid Lands of Western Iran (Case Study: Kane Sorkh Region, Ilam Province), Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research (IJSWR), 50(7): 1701-1719. (In Farsi) Norfleet, M.L., C.A. Ditzler, W.E. Pukett, R.B. Grossman and J.N. shaw. (2003). Soil quality and its relationship to penology. Soil Sci. 168: 149- 181. Oster J.D., 1994. Irrigation with poor quality water. Agricultural Water Management. 25(3); 271-297. Page, A. L., Miller R. H., and Keeney D. R. (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis, part2, chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy,Inc. Soil Science Society of America. Madison, WI. Pieri C.J.M.G. (1992). Fertility of Soils: A Future for Farming in the West African Savannah. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Qi, Y., Jeremy, L., Darilek., Biao Huang., Yongcun Zhao., Weixia Sun., and Zhiquan Gu. (2009). Evaluating soil quality indices in an agricultural region of Jiangsu Province, China. Geoderma. 149(3-4): 325-334. Qin, M.Z., and J. Zhao. (2000). Strategies for sustainable use and characteristics of soil quality changes in urban-rural marginal area: a case study of Kaifeng. Acta Geogr. Sin. 55:545–554. Rahmani poor, F., Bahrami, H., Rahimi Bandarabadi, S., and Fereidooni, Z. (2015). Quantitative Evaluation of Soil Quality and Its Spatial Distribution in Some Agricultural Regions of Qazvin Province, Iran, Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research (IJSWR), 43(1): 1-8. (In Farsi) Ramezani, F., Jafari, S., Salavati, A., and Khalili Moghaddam, B. (2016). Study the Soil Quality Changes Indicators Using Nemoro and Integrated Quality Index Models in Some Khuzestan’s Soils, Journal of Water and Soil, 29(6): 1629-1639. (In Farsi) Reynolds W.D., Drury C.F., Tan C.S., Fox C.A., and Yang X.M. (2009). Use of indicators and pore volume function characteristics to quantify soil physical quality. Geoderma, 152:252-263. Shukla, M.K., Lal R., and Ebinger, M. (2006). Determining soil quality indicators by factor analysis. Soil Till. Res., 87:194-204. Sun, B., Zhou, S., & Zhao, Q. (2003). Evaluation of spatial and temporal changes of soil quality based on geostatistical analysis in the hill region of subtropical China. Geoderma, 115(1), 85-99. Swanepoel, P. A., Du Preez, C. C., Botha, P. R., Snyman, H. A. and Habig, J. (2014). Soil quality characteristics of kikuyu–ryegrass pastures in South Africa. Geoderma, 232, 589-599. Walkley A., and Black I.A. (1934). An examination of degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and aproposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1):29-38. Zehtabian, Gh. R. and Khosravi, H. (2010). Effect of Agricultural Activities on Land Degradation in Taleghan Region, Journal of Range and Watershed Management, Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 63(2), 207-218. Zornoza, R., Acosta, J. A., Bastida, F., Domínguez, S. G., Toledo, D. M., and Faz, A. (2015). Identification of sensitive indicators to assess the interrelationship between soil quality, management practices and human health. Soil, 1(1): 173-185. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 493 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 330 |
||