
تعداد نشریات | 162 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,692 |
تعداد مقالات | 72,229 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 129,176,266 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 102,004,358 |
بررسی اثر مقیاس معادل و خط فقر بر میزان فقر در ایران | ||
تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران | ||
دوره 55، شماره 4، دی 1403، صفحه 683-698 اصل مقاله (1.84 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2020.290372.668826 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
علی اسدی* 1؛ ناصر مطیعی2 | ||
1گروه مدیریت و توسعه دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران | ||
2گروه مدیریت و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف این مقاله بررسی اثر مقیاس معادل بر میزان فقر، کاهش اثر مقیاس معادل در مطالعات فقر و کمک به ادبیات اندازهگیری فقر در ایران است. بدینمنظور، با استفاده از دادههای هزینه و درآمد خانوار سال 1395 و بر اساس چهار مقیاس معادل و سه خط فقر، سطح فقر در ایران اندازهگیری شد. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که مقیاس معادل و خط فقر تاثیر زیادی بر برآورد میزان فقر دارند؛ بهطوریکه با بهکارگیری مقیاسهای معادل و خطوط فقر مختلف نرخ سرشمار فقر از 07/0 تا 28 درصد تغییر میکند. بنابراین، میتوان بیان کرد که بهکارگیری مقیاس معادل و خط فقر مناسب از پیششرطهای اساسی اندازهگیری و سیاستگذاری فقر است. پیشنهاد میگردد از مقیاس معادل و خط فقر متناسب با شرایط ویژه هر یک از مناطق شهری و روستایی کشور استفاده گردد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
فقر؛ مقیاس معادل؛ اندازه خانوار؛ سیاستگذاری فقر | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
The Effect of Equivalence Scale and Poverty Line on Poverty Rate in Iran | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Ali Asadi1؛ Naser Motiei2 | ||
1Department of , Agricultural Management, and Development, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
2Department of , Agricultural Management, and Development, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the equivalence scales effect on poverty rate, reduction of equivalence scales impact on poverty, and contribution to the literature of poverty measurement in Iran. So, we apply household income and expenditure data (2016), four equivalence scales and three poverty lines to measure poverty in Iran. The findings indicate that equivalence scales and poverty lines have a significant effect on poverty rate. So, by applying diverse equivalence scales and poverty lines, poverty rate vary from .07% to 28%. Therefore, applying appropriate equivalence scale and poverty line are essential preconditions for poverty measuring and policy making. It is recommended to apply appropriate equivalence scales and poverty lines according to specific circumstances of each rural and city region of the country. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Poverty, Equivalence Scale, Household Size, Poverty Policy Making | ||
مراجع | ||
Abel-Smith, B., & Townsend, P. (2005). The poor and the poorest. In The Sociology and Politics of Health (pp. 80-84). Routledge.
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of public economics, 95(7-8), 476-487.
Atkinson, A. B. (2019). Measuring Poverty around the World. Princeton University Press.
Balli, F., & Tiezzi, S. (2010). Equivalence scales, the cost of children and household consumption patterns in Italy. Review of Economics of the Household, 8(4), 527-549.
Betti, G., & Lundgren, L. (2012). The impact of remittances and equivalence scales on poverty in Tajikistan. Central Asian Survey, 31(4), 395-408.
Betti, G., Karadag, M. A., Sarica, O., & Ucar, B. (2017). How to Reduce the Impact of Equivalence Scales on Poverty Measurement: Evidence from Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 132(3), 1023-1035.
Beyene, B. M. (2010). How sensitive are poverty measures to the choice of equivalence scale and unit of analysis? Evidence from urban Ethiopia. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on the Ethiopian economy. Addis Ababa: Ethiopian Economic Association (pp. 115-149).
Bishop, J. A., Grodner, A., Liu, H., & Ahamdanech-Zarco, I. (2014). Subjective poverty equivalence scales for Euro Zone countries. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 12(2), 265-278.
Blaylock, J. R. (1991). The impact of equivalence scales on the analysis of income and food spending distributions. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 16 (1), pp.11-20.
Bollino, C. A., & Rossi, N. (1989). Demographic variables in demand systems and related measures of the cost of changing family size. Giornale degli economisti e Annali di economia, 449-465.
Boltvinik, J. (1999). Poverty measurement methods: An overvie. UNDP Social Development & Poverty Elimination Division press.
Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 1(1), 25-49.
Buhmann, B., Rainwater, L., Schmaus, G., & Smeeding, T. M. (1988). Equivalence scales, well‐being, inequality, and poverty: sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) database. Review of Income and Wealth, 34(2), 115-142.
Coulter, F. A., Cowell, F. A., & Jenkins, S. P. (1992). Equivalence scale relativities and the extent of inequality and poverty. The Economic Journal, 102(414), 1067-1082.
De Vos, K., & Zaidi, M. A. (1997). Equivalence scale sensitivity of poverty statistics for the member states of the European community. Review of Income and Wealth, 43(3), 319-333.
Deaton, A. S., & Muellbauer, J. (1986). On measuring child costs: With applications to poor countries. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 720-744.
Engel, E. (1895). Die Lebenskosten belgischer Arbeiter-Familien früher und jetzt. C. Heinrich press.
Ferreira, F. H., Chen, S., Dabalen, A., Dikhanov, Y., Hamadeh, N., Jolliffe, D., ... & Serajuddin, U. (2015). A global count of the extreme poor in 2012: data issues, methodology and initial results. The World Bank.
Gianni, B. (2014). The effect of equivalence scales on poverty at Oblast level in Ukraine. Экономика региона, (2), 78-88.
Glewwe, P. (1991). Household equivalence scales and the measurement of inequality: transfers from the poor to the rich could decrease inequality. Journal of Public Economics, 44(2), 211-216.
Goedhart, T., Halberstadt, V., Kapteyn, A., & Van Praag, B. (1977). The poverty line: concept and measurement. Journal of Human Resources12 (4), 503-520.
Hagenaars, A. J., & Van Praag, B. M. (1985). A synthesis of poverty line definitions. Review of Income and Wealth, 31(2), 139-154.
Hagenaars, A. J., De Vos, K., & Asghar Zaidi, M. (1994). Poverty statistics in the late 1980s: Research based on micro-data. European Commission press
Hunter, B. H., Kennedy, S., & Biddle, N. (2004). Indigenous and other Australian poverty: Revisiting the importance of equivalence scales. Economic Record, 80(251), 411-422.
Islamic parliament research center of the Islamic republic of Iran (2018). Poverty line in Iran in 2016 and a Review on the Method of Calculation, economic research center, December 2018 (In Farsi).
Kapteyn, A., & Van Praag, B. (1978). A new approach to the construction of family equivalence scales. European Economic Review, 7(4), 313-335.
Kuznets, S. S. (1979). Growth, population, and income distribution: Selected essays. New York: Norton.
Lanjouw, P., & Ravallion, M. (1995). Poverty and household size. The economic journal, 105(433), 1415-1434.
Lewbel, A. (1985). A unified approach to incorporating demographic or other effects into demand systems. The Review of Economic Studies, 52(1), 1-18.
Love, R., & Oja, G. (1977). Low income in Canada. Review of Income and Wealth, 23(1), 39-61.
Majumder, A., & Chakrabarty, M. (2010). Estimating equivalence scales through Engel curve analysis. In Econophysics and economics of games, social choices and quantitative techniques (pp. 241-251). Springer, Milano.
OECD (1976). Public Expenditures on Income Maintenance Programs, Studies in Resource Allocation, Vol. 3, Paris.
Orshansky, M. (1965). Counting the poor: Another look at the poverty profile. Soc. Sec. Bull., 28(4), 3-15.
Orshansky, M. (1968). The shape of poverty in 1966. Social Security Bulletin, 31(3), 3-20.
Phipps, S. A. (1993). Measuring poverty among Canadian households: sensitivity to choice of measure and scale. Journal of Human Resources 28(1), 162-184.
Ravallion, M. (1998). Poverty lines in theory and practice (Vol. 133). World Bank Publications.
Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2007). Absolute poverty measures for the developing world, 1981-2004. The World Bank.
Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2019). Global poverty measurement when relative income matters. Journal of public economics, 177(2), 10-46.
Ray, R. (1983). Measuring the costs of children: an alternative approach. Journal of Public Economics, 22(1), 89-102.
Rowntree, B. S. (1901). Poverty: A study of town life. Macmillan.
Seidl, C. (1988). Poverty measurement: a survey. In Welfare and efficiency in public economics (pp. 71-147). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Muellbauer, J., & Van De Ven, J. (2004). Equivalence scales and taxation: A simulation analysis. In Household behaviour, equivalence scales, welfare and poverty. pp. 85-106. Physica-Verlag HD press
Visaria, P. (1979). Demographic Factors and the Distribution-of Income: Some Issues. Economic and Demographic Change: Issues for the 1980's. Liege: IUSSP, 289-320.
World Bank, & Lipton, M. (1983). Labour and poverty. taff working paper ; no. SWP 616 Washington, D.C. : The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/362691468759352054
Logan, T. D. (2011). Economies of scale in the household: Puzzles and patterns from the American past. Economic Inquiry, 49(4), 1008-1028.
Majumder, A., & Chakrabarty, M. (2010). Estimating equivalence scales through Engel curve analysis. In Econophysics and economics of games, social choices and quantitative techniques (pp. 241-251). Springer, Milano.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 558 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 217 |