پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,937,011 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,607,162 |
امکان‌مندی‌های پلتفرم‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی در درگیرسازی کاربران | ||
| بررسی‌های مدیریت رسانه | ||
| دوره 1، شماره 1، 1401، صفحه 4-29 اصل مقاله (644.43 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/mmr.2022.87863 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فاطمه میرزانورعلی1؛ داتیس خواجه ئیان* 2؛ نسترن حاجی حیدری2 | ||
| 1کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: همگام با نفوذ چشمگیر رسانه‌های اجتماعی در شئون مختلف زندگی افراد جامعه، رقابت میان رسانه‌های اجتماعی مختلف برای درگیرسازی هرچه بیشتر کاربران در پلتفرم‌های خود افزایش یافته است. طی دو دهه اخیر، مفهوم درگیرسازی رسانه‌های اجتماعی در ادبیات و پژوهش‌ها برجسته بوده است؛ اما امکان‌مندی‌ها، به‌عنوان عناصر اثرگذار بر درگیرسازی، به‌ندرت بررسی شده است. با وجود اهمیت بسزای امکان‌مندی‌ها در درگیرسازی کاربران و موفقیت رسانه اجتماعی، دانش موجود درباره چگونگی تأثیر امکان‌مندی‌ها بر درگیرسازی کاربران با رسانه‌های اجتماعی نامتمرکز، پراکنده و ناکافی است. این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی و دسته‌بندی مطالعات انجام شده در زمینه تأثیر امکان‌مندی‌ها بر درگیرسازی کاربران در شبکه اجتماعی اجرا شده است. روش: پژوهش حاضر با تحلیل ادبیات موجود به‌روش کتابخانه‌ای و تحلیل ادبیات، به توسعه چارچوبی برای درک بهتر روابط بین متغیرهای مهم و اثرگذار در این حوزه پرداخته و تفاوت‌های زمینه‌ای در امکان‌مندی با درگیرسازی کاربران در رسانه‌های اجتماعی را بررسی کرده است تا برای پژوهش‌های آتی در این زمینه بنیانی دانشی فراهم کند. یافته‌ها: به‌دنبال پاسخ به مسئله اصلی پژوهش، چگونگی تأثیر تجربه امکان‌مندی‌ها بر درگیرسازی کاربران رسانه‌های اجتماعی، مطالعات گذشته بررسی و در سه دسته طبقه‌بندی شدند: «تجربه امکان‌مندی‌ها»، «رویکرد امکان‌مندی‌ها» و «درگیرسازی با امکان‌مندی‌ها». نتیجه‌گیری: امکان‌مندی‌ها در رسانه‌های اجتماعی انواع مختلفی دارند و بهصورتهای متفاوتی دسته‌بندی می‌شوند. از آنجا که این امکان‌مندی‌ها فعالیت‌ها را ممکن می‌سازند و از سوی دیگر، کاربر آنها را درک می‌کند، با آنها رابطه برقرار می‌کند، از آنها استفاده کرده و با آنها تعامل می‌کند؛ می‌تواند عامل یا واسطه درگیرسازی کاربر با رسانه‌های اجتماعی باشد. همچنین، از آنجا که این امکان‌مندی‌ها انواع مختلفی دارند و در هر یک از رسانه‌های اجتماعی به‌گونه متمایزی نمود پیدا می‌کنند، قابلیت‌های متفاوتی را در هر یک از رسانه‌های اجتماعی خلق می‌کنند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| درگیرسازی؛ رسانه‌های اجتماعی؛ تفاوت زمینه‌ای؛ امکان‌مندی؛ مرور نظام‌مند | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the Effect of Social Media Platform Affordances on User Engagement | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fatemeh Mirzanoorali1؛ Datis Khajeheian2؛ Nastaran Hajiheidari2 | ||
| 1M.Sc., Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Prof., Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective With the high influence of social media on the lives of people in the community, the competition between different social media to engage more and more users on their platforms has increased. Social media platforms have become the ubiquity media in the everyday lives of people, especially due to penetration of smartphones. While they provide information, Communication, entertainment and value creation opportunities for their users, there is an intensified competition among them to attract new users and increase their network power. In such competition, engagement is the key term that implies on the level of interaction between the user and platform. Although the concept of social media engagement has been prominent in the literature and research in recent decades, affordances have rarely been studied as influential elements in engagement. Affordances are capabilities that the platform provides to users for activity and exchange of value and user experience, and therefore engage users. Despite the importance of social media affordances in user engagement and the success of social media, there are still poor body of literature. In this regard, the present article analyzes the existing literature to develop a framework for better understanding the relationships between influential variables, including contextual differences in affordance and user engagement on social media. Engagement defined as the quality of the user experience for social media activit`y, which can be uniquely experienced by each user (Voorveld et al., 2018) and measured through actions such as commenting, liking, and content sharing. The context of each social media refers to the unique architecture, culture, and norms of each (Van Dijck, 2013), which are categorized in different ways. Kaplan and Haenlein (2010) argue that social presence/media richness and self-presentation/self-disclosure are the defining characteristics of social media. Using these characteristics, they distinguish collaborative projects, blogs, content communities, social networking sites, virtual game worlds, and virtual social worlds. Zhu and Chen (2015) developed a typology based on two characteristics of social media: nature of connection (profile based versus content-based) and level of customization of messages (the degree to which a service is customized to satisfy an individual’s particular preferences). Different classifications of social media are the result of their different contexts, and one of the criteria for different contexts between platforms is the affordances they provide or prevent. For example, Instagram restricts the affordance of public posting or posting an image in a comment, while Facebook does not. The affordance of retweeting on Twitter by a celebrity is an act of personal and public recognition and creates a sense of intimacy for fans. The affordance of retweeting creates a form of conversation because users retweet to be part of a conversation and convey their opinion about that tweet to their followers (Tanupabrungsun et al., 2018). Affordance Theory takes a socio-technical perspective that lets us be specific about the technology while simultaneously incorporating social and contextual elements. (Volkoff, & Strong, 2017). The value of affordance theory appears when it is used as a lens to change the view of social media engagement and contextual differences. Despite the wide range of research on social media and user engagement, none of the research studies addresses how affordances make possible social engagement processes (Zeng et al., 2018). Therefore, by adopting the affordance theory in engaging users and reviewing the previous studies, we seek the answer to the question of how the experience of affordances in social media affects user engagement? Research Methodology The method used in this research is the Bibliometric Analysis. The literature review of the present study is divided into three areas: 1. Engagement; 2. Affordance; 3. Affordance + Engagement in social media. The most reputable scientific databases, including Routledge, Elsevier, Sage, Wiley, and Emerald, were selected to find research papers on social media engagement and social media affordance. The research documents in the Google Scholar database were also searched and reviewed. In the field of engagement, with the aim of the overview of the subject, a manual search was performed without a time limit until reaching theoretical saturation, articles with high citations in marketing and media were selected and their information was extracted. Pursuing the same goal, in the field of affordance, since the basic concepts and comprehensive definitions were considered, the articles were searched with high citations and without a time limit. Finally, 15 articles were selected and their information was reported in a table (see Table 1). In the third part of the study, which was related to the main purpose of the article and the research issue, a systematic review of scientific articles from 2010 to 2021 was performed in the Web of Science database. In total, 76 articles were found. Limiting the scope of the search to Communication, Management, Business, Computer Science, and Information Science, 34 articles remained. The abstracts of these articles were examined in depth. Finally, 7 articles were selected and their information was reported in another table. Findings A review of the literature over the past decade using Bibliometric Analysis provides a knowledge base for future research. It Identifies and categorizes studies on the effect of affordances on user engagement on social media. Study of the effect of affordances on user engagement from a theoretical perspective to develop the literature and find the knowledge gap from an executive perspective and investing in platforms to create new opportunities for a richer social networking experience is needed and valuable. Such an effort contributes to the presentation of scientific works and theoretical and practical participation in the field under study. Given the fact that this field of study is relatively new and that little work has been done in this area, the current study can contribute to categorizing and integrating the prior knowledge in a meaningful way to provide a coherent framework. Falahatpisheh, & Khajeheian (2020) presented a new and comprehensive typology of affordances, they classify the affordances into 13 groups: Cognitive, physical, sensory, functional, explicit, graphic, language, hidden, pattern, metaphorical, false, negative, and animated affordances are the major types that are identified in their research. Trim and Leonardi (2013), by reviewing past research on the use of social media in organizations offer four relatively fixed affordances, including visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Based on the possibilities discovered by Trim and Leonardi, Zeng et al. develop a theoretical model and examine it in industry. They argue that the functional capabilities of social media are socialized through processes of engagement. Their findings confirm that visibility, persistence, and editability in the industry contribute to shaping the engagement processes, which include recognizing and understanding customer’s needs and motivations, enhancing participation, and motivating collaboration. Studying the impact of these affordances and the limitations or empowerments that result from them on user engagement can provide a basis for increasing knowledge about user engagement on these platforms. There were few studies about the relationship between social media affordances and engagement. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Social media platform, Affordance, User engagement | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
خواجهئیان، داتیس؛ امیدی، افشین و نوروزی، اسماعیل (1398). درگیرسازی مخاطب در رسانه‌ها: ارائه چارچوبی مفهومی. فصلنامه رسانه، 30 (3)، 47-69.
زمانی، زینب؛ حقیقی نصب، منیژه و زرندیان، ندا (1397). بررسی رابطه درگیرسازی مشتری در گروههای گردشگری رسانۀ اجتماعی با تصویر و انتخاب مقصد. فصلنامه مطالعات رسانه‌های نوین، 5(17)، 265- 296.
لبافی، سمیه؛ کیا، علیاصغر و ملکی، مصطفی (1399). شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر درگیرسازی و مشارکت کاربر در شبکه اجتماعی ـ علمی ریسرچگیت». پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 36(1)، 33-62.
Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B. & Ilic, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252–271. doi:10.1177/1094670511411703 Bucher, T. & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. Sage Publications. Bullock, K., Garland, J. & Coupar, F. (2021). Police-community engagement and the affordances and constraints of social media. Policing and Society, 31(4), 373-385. Cabiddu, F., De Carlo, M. & Piccoli, G. (2014). Social media affordances: Enabling customer engagement. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals. 2014.06.003 Calder, B. J., Isaac, M. S. & Malthouse, E. C. (2016). How to capture consumer experiences: A context-specific approach to measuring engagement: Predicting consumer behavior across qualitatively different experiences. Journal of Advertising Research, 56(1), 39-52. Calder, B. J., Malthouse, E. C. & Schaedel, U. (2009). An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(4), 321–331. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2009.07.002 Calder, B.J. & Malthouse, E.C. (2008). Media engagement and advertising effectiveness. Kellogg on advertising and media, 1, 36. Chan-Olmsted, S. M. & Wang, R. (2019). Shifts in Consumer Engagement and Media Business Models. In M. Deuze & M. Prenger (Eds.), Making Media: production, Practices, and Professions, Amsterdam University Press. Chan-Olmsted, S. M. & Wolter, L. C. (2018). Perceptions and practices of media engagement: A global perspective. International journal on media management, 20(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2 Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., Brodie, R. J. & Hollebeek, L. D. (2016). Social media engagement: A construct of positively and negatively valenced engagement behaviour. In R.J. Brodie, L.D. Hollebeek & J. Conduit (Eds.) Customer engagement: Contemporary issues and challenges (pp. 102–102). London, UK: Routledge. Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Frethey-Bentham, C., Fahy, J. & Goodman, S. (2019). Social media engagement behavior: A framework for engaging customers through social media content. European Journal of Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2017-0182. Falahatpisheh, Z. & Khajeheian, D. (2020, November). Affordances and IT Design: A typology for social media and platform affordances. In 2020 13th CMI Conference on Cybersecurity and Privacy (CMI)-Digital Transformation-Potentials and Challenges (51275) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. Faraj, S. & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fayard, A.L. & Weeks, J. (2014). Affordances for practice. Information and Organization, 24(4), 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.001 Gibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Greve, G. (2014). The moderating effect of customer engagement on the brand image – brand loyalty relationship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 203– 210. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.035 Gummerus, J., Liljander, V., Weman, E. & Pihlström, M. (2012). Customer engagement in a Facebook brand community. Management Research Review, 35(9), 857–877. doi:10.1108/ 01409171211256578 Hallock, W., Roggeveen, A. & Crittenden, V. (2019). Firm-level perspectives on social media engagement: An exploratorystudy. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Halpern Jelin, D. M., Valenzuela, S. & Katz, J. E. (2017). We Face, I Tweet: How Different Social Media Influence Political Participation through Collective and Internal Efficacy. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-01-2017-0025.
Hollebeek, L. D., Glynn, M. S. & Brodie, R. J. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of interactive marketing, 28(2), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002 Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68. Khajeheian, D., Omidi, A., Norouzi, E. (2019), Audience Engagement of Media: Presenting a conceptual framework, Mass media scientific quarterly 30(3), 47-69. (in Persian) Labafi S, Kia A, Malaki M. (2020). Engaging User in Academic Social Network: Identifying Effective Factors (Case study: Research Gate). Iranian journal of information processing and management 36(1), 33-62. (in Persian) Lane, D. S., Das, V. & Hiaeshutter-Rice, D. (2019). Civic laboratories: youth political expression in anonymous, ephemeral, geo-bounded social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(14), 2171-2186 Lee, D., Hosanagar, K. & Nair, H. (2018). Advertising content and consumer engagementon social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Science, 64(11), 4967–5460. Malthouse, E. C., Haenlein, M., Skiera, B., Wege, E. & Zhang, M. (2013). Managing customer relationships in the social media era: Introducing the social CRM house. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 270–280. McVeigh-schultz, J. & Baym, N. K. (2015). Thinking of you: Vernacular affordance in the context of the microsocial relationship app, Couple. Social Media+ Society, 1(2), 2056305115604649. Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M. & Smit, E. G. (2011). Introducing cobras. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 13–46. Norman, D.A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic books. Picone, I., Kleut, J., Pavlíčková, T., Romic, B., Møller Hartley, J. & De Ridder, S. (2019). Small acts of engagement: Reconnecting productive audience practices with everyday agency. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819837569 PwC (2019). IAB internet advertising revenue report: 2018 full year results. Available at https://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Full-Year- 2018-IAB-Internet-AdvertisingRevenue-Report.pdf (accessed 05 May 2020). Sashi, C. M. (2012). Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships, and social media. Management Decision, 50(2), 253–272. doi:10.1108/00251741211203551 Shahbaznezhad, H., Dolan, R. & Rashidirad, M. (2021). The role of social media content format and platform in Users' engagement behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 53, 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.05.001 Statista (2021). Number of Instagram users worldwide from 2016 to 2023. Avaialbe at https://www.statista.com/statistics/183585/instagram-number-of-global-users/ Strong, D.M., Volkoff, O., Johnson, S.A., Pelletier, L.R., Tulu, B., Bar-On, I., Trudel, J. & Garber, L. (2014). A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(2), 53–85. Tafesse, W. (2016). An experiential model of consumer engagement in social media. Journal of Product & Brand Management. Tanupabrungsun, S. & Hemsley, J. (2018). Studying celebrity practices on Twitter using a framework for measuring media richness. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 2056305118763365. Toler Jr, R. L. (2017). Structural equation modeling of advertising involvement, consumer attitude, and engagement for video advertising in a social networking site. Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University. Treem, J.W. & Leonardi, P.M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, (36), 143-189. Tsoukas, H. (1989). The validity of ideographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 551-561. Vale, L. & Fernandes, T. (2018). Social media and sports: driving fan engagement with football clubs on Facebook. Journal of strategic marketing, 26(1), 37-55. Van de Ven, A.H. (1989). Nothing is quite as practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 486-489. Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P. & Verhoef, P. C. (2010). Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of service research, 13(3), 253-266. Volkoff, O. & Strong, D. M. (2017). Affordance theory and how to use it in IS research. In the routledge companion to management information systems (pp. 232-245). Routledge. Voorveld, H. A., Van Noort, G., Muntinga, D. G. & Bronner, F. (2018). Engagement with social media and social media advertising: The differentiating role of platform type. Journal of advertising, 47(1), 38-54. Wang, R., Yang, F., Zheng, S. & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Why do we pin? New gratifications explain unique activities in Pinterest. Social Media+ Society, 2(3), 2056305116662173. Weller, K. (2016). Trying to understand social media users and usage: The forgotten features of social media platforms. Online Information Review, 40(2), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2015-0299 Yang, S., Lin, S., Carlson, J. R. & Ross Jr, W. T. (2016). Brand engagement on social media: will firms’ social media efforts influence search engine advertising effectiveness? Journal of Marketing Management, 32(5-6), 526-557. Zamani, Z., Haghighinasab, M., Zarandian, N. (2017). Investigating the relationship between customer engagement and image and destination selection in social media tourism groups. New media studies quarterly, 5(17), 265-296. (in Persian) Zeng, X., McKenna, B., Richter, S. & Cai, W. (2019). How Social media can afford engagement processes. In: Themistocleous M., Rupino da Cunha P. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 341. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11395-7_23 Zhu, Y. Q. & Chen, H. G. (2015). Social media and human need satisfaction: Implications for social media marketing. Business horizons, 58(3), 335-345. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 426 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 450 |
||