پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,533 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,508 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,128,267 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,235,645 |
شاخص بهره‌وری مالمکوئیست هزینه گروهی: مطالعه موردی در صنعت بانکداری | ||
| مدیریت صنعتی | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 3، 1401، صفحه 484-504 اصل مقاله (617.29 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/imj.2022.337945.1007915 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| منا حبیب پور1؛ محمدرضا علیرضایی* 2؛ جلیل رشیدی نیا3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه تحقیق در عملیات، دانشکده ریاضی، دانشگاه علم وصنعت ایران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه ریاضی کاربردی، دانشکده ریاضی، دانشگاه علم‌وصنعت ایران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3استاد، گروه ریاضی کاربردی، دانشکده ریاضی، دانشگاه علم‌وصنعت ایران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: برای ارزیابی درجه تحقق اهداف سازمان، باید بهره‌وری آن سازمان سنجیده شود و چون هر سازمانی از گروه‌ها و بخش‌های مختلفی تشکیل شده است، باید بهره‌وری گروه‌های آن بررسی شود. هدف این مقاله معرفی شاخصی مناسب برای ارزیابی تغییرات بهره‌وری هزینه گروه‌ها و شناسایی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر آن است. برای توضیح کاربردیبودن شاخص پیشنهادی، مطالعه‌ای در زمینه ارزیابی بهره‌وری شعبه‌های یکی از بانک‌های کشور در مناطق مختلف ارائه می‌شود. روش: برای اندازه‌گیری کارایی هزینه یک گروه، تابع فاصلهای مناسب ایجاد و بر اساس آن، شاخص بهره‌وری مالمکوئیست هزینه گروهی معرفی می‌شود. سپس، عوامل تأثیرگذار بر رشد بهره‌وری گروه‌ها با تمرکز بر دو بخش درو‌ن‌گروهی و برون‌گروهی بررسی می‌شود. یافته‌ها: شاخصی مناسب برای ارزیابی تغییرات بهره‌وری هزینه گروهی از واحدهای تصمیم‌گیری معرفی شد. برای تبیین کاربردیبودن شاخص پیشنهادی، یک مطالعه موردی واقعی در زمینه بانکداری انجام شد. در این مطالعه تغییرات بهره‌وری هزینه شعبه‌های یکی از بانک‌های کشور، در هشت منطقه مختلف ارزیابی شد. نتایج محاسبه شاخص و مؤلفه‌های مختلف آن روی داده‌های بانک اطلاعات معنادار و سودمندی درباره تغییرات بهره‌وری بانک در نواحی مختلف ارائه داد. نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج نشان داد که شاخص پیشنهادی، علاوه بر آنکه ابزار مناسبی برای ارزیابی بهره‌وری گروه‌ها ارائه میکند با شناسایی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر تغییرات بهره‌وری، چشم‌انداز روشنی در اختیار مدیران سازمان‌ها برای سیاست‌گذاری‌های بعدی قرار می‌دهد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بهره‌وری هزینه؛ تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها؛ شاخص مالمکوئیست؛ کارایی هزینه؛ گروه‌ها | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Group Cost Malmquist Productivity Index: A Case Study of Bank Industry | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mona Habibpoor1؛ Mohammadreza Alirezaee2؛ Jalil Rashidinia3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Operations Research, Faculty of Mathematics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Prof., Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Prof., Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: To evaluate the achievement degree of an organization to its goals, its productivity must be measured. Since an organization is composed of different groups, the productivity of its groups should be examined. This paper aims to introduce a suitable index to evaluate group cost productivity changes and identify factors affecting it. To explain the applicability of the proposed index, a study on the productivity evaluation of a bank's branches in different regions is presented. Methods: A suitable distance function is created to measure the cost efficiency of a group, and based on that, the group cost Malmquist index is introduced. Then, the influencing factors on the productivity growth of the groups are examined by focusing on intra-group and extra-group sections. Results: An indicator was presented to evaluate the cost productivity changes of a group of decision-making units and the factors that affect the cost productivity changes of the groups were identified. The proposed group Malmquist index breaks down into four components: Pure efficiency changes, scale efficiency changes, allocative efficiency changes, and cost technological changes. The pure efficiency change measures the optimal use of inputs to produce output indicators. The scale efficiency changes reflect the effect of changes in the size of branches of a region on its productivity growth. The allocative efficiency changes indicate the achieved changes in the optimal combinations of inputs considering the prices of each period. The cost technological changes component reflects changes in cost technology frontiers during two periods. All of these components were examined from two perspectives: intra-group and extra-group. In the intra-group perspective, the internal group frontier is considered, and in the extra-group perspective, the common frontier of all groups is focused. To explain the applicability of the proposed index and calculate the impact of its components on productivity growth, a real case study was presented. This case study evaluated the cost productivity changes of a bank's branches in eight different regions. The results showed that three regions have cost productivity growth. One area has almost no changes in cost productivity, and the other regions have productivity regressions. The results of measuring the group cost Malmquist productivity index on bank data provide meaningful and useful information about bank productivity changes in different areas. Conclusion: Most organizations consist of different groups and departments. Sometimes, it is necessary to examine a group of decision-making units instead of evaluating the performance of several decision-making units to analyze the role of environmental conditions on the performance assessment of the decision-making units. The results are shown that the proposed group cost Malmquist productivity index provides a suitable tool for evaluating the cost productivity changes of groups. Also, it prepares a clear perspective for managers of organizations for future policies by identifying the intra-group and extra-group factors affecting group cost productivity changes. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cost efficiency, Cost productivity, Data envelopment analysis, Groups, Malmquist index | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References Abbaspour, M., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Karbassi, A.R., Roayaei E. & Nikoomaram H. (2009). Development of the Group Malmquist Productivity Index on non-discretionary Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research (IJER), 3(1), 109-116. Afsharian, M., Ahn, H., Harms, S. G. (2019). Performance comparison of management groups under centralised management, European Journal of Operational Research, 278, 845-854. Ang S., Chen M., Yang F. (2018). Group cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis: An application to Taiwan hotels. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 125, 190-199. Aparicio, J., Crespo-Cebada, E., Pedraja-Chaparro, F., Santín, D. (2017). Comparing school ownership performance using a pseudo-panel database: A Malmquist-type index approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 256(2), 533-542. Aparicio, J. & Santin, D. (2018). A note on measuring group performance over time with pseudopanels. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(1), 227-235. Aparicioa, J., Ortiza, L., Santín, D. (2021), Comparing group performance over time through the Luenberger productivity indicator: An application to school ownership in European countries, European Journal of Operational Research, 294(2), 651-672. Bagherzadeh Valami, H. (2009). Group performance evaluation, an application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 230(2), 485-490. Berg, S.A., Forsund, F.R., Hjalmarsson L. & Suominen M. (1993). Banking efficiency in the nordic countries. Journal of Banking Finance, 17, 371-388. Camanho, A.S. & Dyson, R.G. (2006). Data envelopment analysis and Malmquist indices for measuring group performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 26, 35-49. Caves, D., Chirstensen, L. & Dievert, W. (1982). The economic theory of index number and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica, 50(6), 1393-1414. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. & Rhodes, E. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Manag Sci, 27(6), 668-697. Cook, W.D. & Zhu, J. (2007). Within-group common weights in DEA: An analysis of power plant efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 178, 207-216. Fang, L. (2022), Measuring and decomposing group performance under centralized managemen. European Journal of Operational Research, 297(3), 1006-1013. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B. & Roose P. (1992). Productivity change in Swedish analysis pharmacies 1980-1989, a nonparametric Malmquist approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 85-102. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 120, 253-281. Forsund, F.R. & Hjalmarsson, L. (1979). Generalized Farrell measures of efficiency: An application to milk processing in Swedish dairy plants. The Economic Journal, 89(354), 294-315. Grifell-Tatjé E. & Lovell, C. (1997). The sources of productivity change in Spanish banking. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 364-380. Kao, C. (2009). Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 1107-12. Li, S.K. & Ng, Y.C. (1995). Measuring the productive efficiency of a group of firms. International Advances in Economic Research, 1(4), 377-390. Maniadakis, N. & Thanassoulis, E. (2004). A cost Malmquist productivity index, European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 396-409. Mirghaderi, S.A.H. & Sheikh Aboumasoudi, A. (2017). The Ranking of Financial Efficiency of Companies Accepted in Stock Exchange of Tehran between 2013 to 2016 through Financial Ratio Approach and Using DEA. International Journal of Data Envelopment Analysis, 5(3), 1337-1352. Paradi, J. C. & Zhu, H. (2013). A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis. Omega, 41, 61-79. Pastor, J.T., Perez F. & Quesada, J. (1997). Efficiency analysis in banking firms: an international comparison. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 395-407. Payan, A. & Rahmani Parchikolaei, B. (2014). Analysis of Group Performance Using Common Weights. In J of Mathematical models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 8, 59-68. Rezaee, M.J. & Karimdadi A. (2015). Do Geographical Locations Affect in Hospitals Performance? A Multi-group Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Medical Systems, 39 (9), 85. Shephard, R.W. (1970). Theory of Cost and Production Function. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Thanassoulis, E., Khanjani Shiraz, R. & Maniadakis, N. (2014). A Cost Malmquist Productive Index Capturing Group Performance. Journal of Operational Research, 241(3), 796-805. Thanassoulis, E., Khanjani Shiraz, R. & Maniadakis, N. (2015). A Cost Malmquist Productive Index Capturing Group Performance. Journal of Operational Research, 241, 1-32. Walheer, B. (2018). Cost Malmquist productivity index: an output-specific approach for group comparison. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 49, 79-94. Ylvinger S. (2000). Industry performance and structural efficiency measures: Solutions to problems in firm models. European Journal of Operational Research, 121(1), 164- 174. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 388 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 379 |
||