پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,244 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,920 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,607,592 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,380,850 |
کاربران و پژوهشگران راجع به سیاست‌های مرتبط با رسانه‌های اجتماعی چه می‌گویند؟ (ترسیم نقشه با استفاده از داده‌های پایگاه‌های گوگل و اسکوپوس) | ||
| بررسی‌های مدیریت رسانه | ||
| دوره 2، شماره 1، 1402، صفحه 137-155 اصل مقاله (1.31 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/mmr.2023.364482.1058 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سمیه لبافی* 1؛ صانع محمدابراهیم‌زاده سپاسگزار2؛ صمد سپاسگزار3 | ||
| 1استادیار، پژوهشکده جامعه و اطلاعات، پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران (ایرانداک)، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت رسانه، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه سیدنی، استرالیا. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: عموم کاربران هر روزه به سیاست‌های مرتبط با رسانه‌های اجتماعی، از خود حساسیت بیشتری نشان می‌دهند. این حساسیتِ عموم، تبدیل به حساسیت‌های پژوهشی نیز شده است و در سال‌های اخیر، حجم پژوهش‌هایی که در این رابطه منتشر شده، افزایش یافته است. آگاهی از حساسیت‌های کاربران به سیاست‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی (با استفاده از تحلیل داده‌های گوگل ترند) از یک سو و ارتباط آن با جهت‌گیری‌هایی که پژوهشگران در خصوص مطالعه این حوزه داشته‌اند (تحلیل داده‌های پایگاه اسکوپوس) هدف این پژوهش بوده است. روش: پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از فنون تحلیل شبکه و تحلیل خوشه انجام شده است. دوره زمانی مدنظر برای استخراج دادهها از پایگاه اسکوپوس، سال‌های ۲۰۰۴ تا ۲۰۲۱ و برای پایگاه گوگل، سال‌های ۲۰۱۷ تا ۲۰۲۱ بوده است. جست‌وجو بر اساس رشته عبارت «رسانه‌های اجتماعی» با ترکیب کلمات کلیدی تنظیم‌گری، سیاست‌گذاری و حکمرانی در این دو پایگاه انجام شد. یافته‌ها: بر اساس رشته عبارت جست‌وجو شده در پایگاه اسکوپوس، از سال ۲۰۰۴ تا ۲۰۲۱، تعداد ۴۴۶ مقاله یافت شد. شبکه ایجاد شده از تحلیل مقاله‌ها نشان می‌دهد که رسانه‌های اجتماعی، کانون ارتباط در این شبکه قرار گرفته و در طول سال‌های مختلف، شکل ارتباط شبکه تغییر کرده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که میان مطالعات حوزه سیاست‌گذاری رسانه‌های اجتماعی و نتایج جست‌وجوی کاربران در گوگل، به لحاظ زمانی رابطه نزدیکی وجود دارد. نتیجه‌گیری: از سالهایی که نگرانی عمومی به عملکرد رسانه‌های اجتماعی شکل گرفت، شاهد رشد پژوهشهای مرتبط با حوزههای سیاستی رسانه‌های اجتماعی بوده‌ایم؛ به‌طوری که در پژوهشها مفاهیمی مانند حریم خصوصی و محافظت از داده‌های کاربران رسانه‌های اجتماعی، در سال‌های اخیر با تکرار فراوان بررسی شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| رسانه‌های اجتماعی؛ سیاست‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی؛ تحلیل شبکه؛ پایگاه اسکوپوس؛ گوگل ترند | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| What Do Users and Researchers Say about Social Media Policies? (Mapping data from Google and Scopus) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Somayeh Labafi1؛ Sanee Mohammad Ebrahimzadeh Sepasgozar2؛ Samad Mohammad Ebrahimzadeh Sepasgozar3 | ||
| 1Assistant Prof., Department of Media Management, Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2PhD. Candidate, Department of Media Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Prof., Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, UNSW Sydney. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective These days users show more sensitivity towards the policies related to social media. This public concern has also become a research sensitivity and in recent years, the amount of research published in this regard has increased. Awareness of users' sensitivities towards social media policies (using Google Trend data analysis) on the one hand and its relationship with the orientation that researchers have had regarding the study of this field (Scopus database data analysis) is the aim of this research. Research Methodology The present research was conducted using network analysis and cluster analysis techniques. The desired period for extracting data from the Scopus database was from 2004 to 2021 and for the Google database from 2017 to 2021. The search was done based on the keyword of social media by combining the keywords of regulation, policy and governance in these two databases. Findings The network created from the analysis of articles related to the searched keywords shows that social media is the center of communication in this network and the form of network communication has changed over the years. The results show that there is a close relationship between social media policy studies and user search results in Google, in terms of time. Since the years when public concern about the performance of social media has been formed, we have witnessed the growth of research related to the policy areas of social media, so concepts such as privacy and data protection of social media users in recent years with It has been discussed many times in researches. The systematic analysis revealed that policy development has received less attention in the literature, while previous studies focused on the development of social media itself. The networks developed for investigating the keywords of the Social Media Policy (SMP) dataset show that privacy, public policy, online networking, and decision-making are the main concerns in the literature. At the same time, the search within Google shows that the public interest in searching relevant keywords has increased over the years but has had a slight decrease in recent years. Discussion & Conclusion The analysis shows that the SMP literature is direct to the application of machine learning, policy responses to new challenges, Covid-19, and health care in recent years. These directions tend to be extended as emerging themes in the literature. Machine learning (ML) is used for different purposes in the field of social media. For example, recent studies have developed ML algorithms for detecting bots on different platforms, and intentions to use social media. Some other studies focused on all these emerging themes at the same time. Some of them analyze and monitor the pandemic changes due to Covid-19 applying ML on social media data. ML is increasingly being applied to datasets originated by social media for health purposes such as anxiety, depression, abuse and ... analysis. This article has two levels of innovation. First, the subject of this research, social media policymaking, has been a very important topic in recent years, and this research has tried to conduct a systematic review of it and map this scientific field to help develop future research. Second, this research, like the previous works, did not focus only on presenting a scientific map of a field using the data of scientific databases but also considered the comparison of trends in Scopus and Google search databases. Examining a scientific field about which there are many challenges in the general society is not possible only by examining the previous research of that field. Social media policy-making has been a challenging issue in these years, as it is involved with the public interests of a wide range of citizens and has wide-ranging effects on users' activities, which has confronted policymakers with new issues. Therefore, identifying the issues that are considered by general users of social media and comparing what has been at the center of attention for researchers can be a guide for policymakers in this field. This innovation in the way of dealing with social media policy, which has not been done so far, can be a good example for implementation in other fields of science. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Social media, Social media policies, Network analysis, Scopus database, Google Trends | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Anansaringkarn, P. & Neo, R. (2021). How can state regulations over the online sphere continue to respect the freedom of expression? A case study of contemporary ‘fake news’ regulations in Thailand. Information & Communications Technology Law, 30(3), 283-303. DOI: 10.1080/13600834.2020.1857789 Baladron, M. & Ezequiel, R. (2019). Video-on-demand services in Latin America: Trends and challenges towards access, concentration and regulation. Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 10(1), 109-126.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp.10.1.109_1 Edom, S. J., Hwang, H. & Kim, J. H. (2018). Can social media increase government responsiveness? A case study of Seoul, Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 35, 109–122. Evens, T. & Donders, K. (2018). Platform power and policy in transforming television markets. Springer. Flew, T. (2021). Regulating Platforms (1st edition). Polity. Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: a critical introduction. Sage. Gintova, M. (2019). Understanding government social media users: an analysis of interactions on Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada Twitter and Facebook. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101388. Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1) Helberger, N. (2020). The political power of platforms: How current attempts to regulate misinformation amplify opinion power. Digital Journalism, 8(6), 842-854. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2020.1773888 Hermes, S., Schreieck, M., & Thatcher, J. (2022). Essential platform infrastructure and the need for regulation. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2022.813 Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2019). The “arbiters of what our voters see”: Facebook and Google’s struggle with policy, process, and enforcement around political advertising. Political Communication, 36(4), 499-522. Kurdi, B. A., Alshurideh, M., Nuseir, M., Aburayya, A. & Salloum, S. A. (2021). The effects of subjective norm on the intention to use social media networks: an exploratory study using PLS-SEM and machine learning approach. International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications, Springer Liu, Y., Whitfield, C., Zhang, T., Hauser, A., Reynolds, T. & Anwar, M. (2021). Monitoring COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of social media using natural language processing and machine learning. Health Information Science and Systems, 9(1), 1-16. Napoli, P. M. (2019). User data as public resource: Implications for social media regulation. Policy & Internet, 11(4), 439-459. Nooren, P., Van Gorp, N., Van Eijk, N. & Fathaigh, R. (2018). Should we regulate digital platforms? A New Framework for Evaluating Policy Options, Policy & Internet, 10(3), 264-301. Parkhurst, J. (2017). The politics of evidence; from evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. Routledge. London Perscheid, G., Ostern, N. K., & Moormann, J. (2020). Determining Platform Governance: Framework for Classifying Governance Types. In ICIS. Saifullah, S., Fauziah, Y. & Aribowo, A. S. (2021). Comparison of machine learning for sentiment analysis in detecting anxiety based on social media data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06353. Sazzed, S. (2020). Abusive content detection in transliterated Bengali-English social media corpus. Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computational Approaches to Linguistic Code-Switching. Simonofski, A, Fink, J, Burnay, C. (2021). Supporting policy-making with social media and e-participation platforms data: A policy analytics framework, Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101590. Smys, S. & Raj, J.S. (2021). Analysis of deep learning techniques for early detection of depression on social media network-a comparative study. Journal of trends in Computer Science and Smart technology (TCSST), 3(01), 24-39. Sun, T. Q. & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: Evidence from Public Healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008 Suzor, N. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. Cambridge University Press. Wahyuningtyas, S. Y. (2019). Self-regulation of online platform and competition policy challenges: A case study on Go-Jek. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 20(1), 33–53. Wooldridge, J.M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach, Cengage learning. Yan, Z. (2018). Big data and government governance. International Conference on Information Management and Processing. IEEE. 110-114. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 61 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 145 |
||