پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,573 |
| تعداد مقالات | 71,032 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 125,502,332 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 98,766,455 |
ورشکستگی دولت و امنیتی‌شدن سیاست خارجی افغانستان (۲۰۲۱-۲۰۰۱) | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 1، شهریور 1403، صفحه 283-307 اصل مقاله (806.51 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2024.354535.450126 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سید احمد فاطمی نژاد* 1؛ محمدشریف تنیوال2 | ||
| 1استادیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پس از بازگشت دوبارۀ طالبان به قدرت در افغانستان، نقاط ضعف و قوت حکومت پیشین در سالهای ۲۰۰۱ تا ۲۰۲۱، بیش از پیش مورد توجه قرارگرفته است. یکی از نکته‌های قابل توجه در‌مورد سیاست خارجی افغانستان در دورۀ پیشین امنیتی‌شدن آن است. در این مقاله امنیتی‌شدن سیاست خارجی افغانستان در دورۀ یادشده، مورد بررسی قرار می‌گیرد و نقش ورشکستگی دولت کابل در این وضعیت سنجیده می‌شود. پرسش اصلی این است که: ورشکستگی دولت چه نقشی در امنیتی‌شدن سیاست خارجی افغانستان در سالهای ۲۰۰۱ تا ۲۰۲۱ داشته‌است؟ در پاسخ، این فرضیه مطرح می‌شود که ناامنی، بیثباتی سیاسی و ناکارآمدی اقتصادی، موجب امنیتی‌شدنِ سیاست خارجی افغانستان در دورۀ ۲۰۰۱ تا ۲۰۲۱ شده‌است. برای آزمون این فرضیه، از ترکیب مفهوم «شبهدولت» رابرت جکسون و نظریۀ امنیتی‌شدن مکتب کپنهاگ به‌عنوان چارچوب نظری، استفاده خواهدشد. روشِ پژوهش در این مقاله، روش کیفی و براساس تحلیل متن‌های موجود در مورد چگونگی سیاستگذاری خارجی افغانستان است. یافته‌های این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که ورشکستگی دولت و به‌دنبال آن تهدید نظام جمهوری در افغانستان، دولتمردان افغانستان را به پیگیری رویکرد امنیتی در سیاست‌خارجی این کشور برای حفظ دولت و بقای نظام واداشت. این رویکرد، حدود بیست سال بر سیاست خارجی افغانستان حاکم بود و کمکهای سیاسی، نظامی و مالیِ فراوانی را، از سوی جامعۀ بین‌المللی بهویژه آمریکا به‌همراه داشت. با اینحال، دستاوردهای آن پایدار نبود. نظام جمهوریاسلامی افغانستان سقوط کرد و جای خود را به امارت اسلامی داده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| امنیتی‌شدن؛ شبهدولت؛ سیاست خارجی؛ دولت ورشکسته؛ افغانستان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| State Failure and the Securitization of Afghanistan's Foreign Policy (2001-2021) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Seyed Ahmad Fatemi Nejad1؛ Muhammadsharif Taniwall2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 2A Ph.D. Candidate in Political Science, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: After September 11, 2001 and the establishment of the republican system in Afghanistan, one of the most obvious features of the state’s foreign policy was its security aspect. Therefore, Afghanistan signed long-term strategic cooperation documents with US, India and about twenty western countries. The creation of the Supreme Peace Council, the establishment of the Kabul Process, the agreement with the establishment of the political office of the Taliban in Doha, the release of five thousand Taliban prisoners, the visit of Afghan heads of government to regional powers and their participation in regional organizations to create regional consensus are all signs of securitization of Afghanistan's foreign policy. This situation has sometimes led to securitization, sometimes to non-securitization and sometimes cross processes of securitization and de-securitization. Considering that the securitization of Afghanistan's foreign policy has led to significant material and diplomatic benefits to Kabul during the period under review, the factors of this matter deserve more attention. It seems that one of the things that played a role in this field was the failure of the Afghan government during 2001-2021. Therefore, the main purpose of this article is to examine the relationship between the failure of the Afghan government and the securitization of its foreign policy. Research question: The main question in this article is what role did the failure of the government in the years 2001 to 2021 play in the securitization of Afghanistan's foreign policy? The importance of this issue is because, on the one hand, it helps to understand one of the factors of the collapse of the republican system in Afghanistan and on the other hand, it depicts the prospects of the current conditions of this country. Research hypothesis: The hypothesis of the article is that insecurity, political instability and economic inefficiency have caused securitization of Afghanistan's foreign policy during 2001 to 2021. In this way, the Afghan government appeared as a failed state due to its lack of efficiency and legitimacy and this contributed to the securitization of its foreign policy. Methodology and theoretical framework: In this article, a qualitative method is applied and an attempt is made to discover the causal relationship between independent (state failure) and dependent (foreign policy securitization) variables. Also, to confirm the above hypothesis, Robert Jackson's "quasi-state" concept and the theory of securitization in the Copenhagen School are combined and presented as a theoretical framework. According to Jackson, a quasi-state is a state that is unable to establish security, enforce human rights and create social privileges and economic comfort. Therefore, these states are subject to internal instability and legitimacy crisis. Although quasi-states have the same external rights and responsibilities like other independent states, they are far from a sovereign state due to the lack of institutional features of a state. According to Jackson, quasi-states are a type of minimal agency that cannot provide basic needs such as law, order, security, and welfare, and mainly become a source of wealth and power for a small group of elites. Therefore, indicators such as the lack of control over the territory, the lack of monopoly in the use of legitimate force, the lack of authority to make collective decisions, the inability to provide public services and the inability to fulfill international obligations can be considered for failed states. Since quasi-states lack “empirical sovereignty” and do not have much power to implement their responsibilities, in their framework, the national, international and humanitarian responsibilities of the government are changed or not realized. Therefore, the foreign policy maker in such states is forced to attract international aid to ward off threats and implement international obligations. In other words, the only way to attract international aid is to highlight threats and securitize foreign policy. Securitization is one of the turning points of the Copenhagen School. In the securitization process, the issue is introduced as an existential threat and is pursued beyond official laws. Therefore, any threat that falls within the scope of security issues affects the domestic and foreign policy of a country. In general, the failure of the state, which internally causes the lack of order and rule of law, economic inefficiency and the crisis of political legitimacy weakens the government’s ability to make foreign commitments. In such a situation, where the internal environment is quite favorable for the growth of terrorism and other irresponsible armed groups and interventions by foreign actors and the failed state is unable to deal with it, foreign policy-makers try to adopt strategies such as the securitization of foreign policy to attract international aid, eliminate threats and ensure the survival of the system. Results and discussion: According to the theoretical model presented above, it is possible to look for the signs of the securitization of Afghanistan's foreign policy at three national, regional and international levels and explain how this process is happened. Although at the first glance, it seemed that the chaotic conditions of Afghanistan along with the nature of the international community’s fight against terrorism caused this situation, but by focusing on the foreign policy of Afghanistan in the period under review, it is clear that apart from the reasons mentioned, other factors also played a role in the securitization of this country's foreign policy; the factors that were highlighted by Afghan and foreign factors so that Afghanistan remains at the center of attention of international community and attract the necessary financial and political support. In the meantime, especially the failure of the state in Afghanistan facilitated the process of securitizing of the country’s foreign policy. Conclution: The final consequence of the securitization of Afghanistan's foreign policy in the period under review was the fall of the government and in fact, the collapse of the republican system on August 15, 2021, A consequence that was raised as the main threat in Afghanistan’s foreign policy and many efforts were made to prevent it, and as a result, a lot of security-military, political and economic support was provided by the international community. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Foreign Policy, Failed State, Quasi-State, Securitization, Afghanistan | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Andish, Seyed Javaid (2020), Political Deviation and Peace (Book 1), Kabul: Karwan University [in Persian]. Atai, Farhad and Mohammad Musa Jafari (2019), “Geopolitical Developments and Foreign Policy of Afghanistan (1919-2001)”, Central Eurasian Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 157-175, (doi: 10.22059/JCEP.2019.257920.449767), [in Persian]. Azad, Khadim (2019), “Regional Consensus for Peace; What Is President Ghani Looking for?” Available at: https://www.etilaatroz.com/79156/special-report-regional-consensus-peace-what-president-ghani, (Accessed on: 6/7/2022), [in Persian]. Bahush Fardaghi, Mahmoud and Peyman Zanganeh (2016), “Investigating the Process of Nation-State Building in the Post-Cold War Period in Afghanistan (With Emphasis on Three International, Regional and Domestic Dimensions)”, Politics Quarterly, No. 9, pp. 25-40, Available at: https://modares.ac.ir/uploads/Culture.StuJournals.1076.pdf, (Accessed on:15/5/2023), [in Persian]. Brock, Lothar and Others (2015), Fragile States (War and Conflict in the Modern World), Translated by A. Rashidi, Tehran: Amirkabir, [in Persian]. Buzan, Barry (1991), People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Buzan. Barry, Waver, Ole and Wilde. John. D. (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner. Buzan. Barry, Waver, Ole. and Wilde John. D (2007), A New Framework for Security Analysis, translated by Alireza, Tayeb, Tehran: Strategic Studies, [in Persian]. Chegnizadeh, Gholam Ali and Mohammad Reza Sahrayi (2015), "Evaluation of Peace Building in Afghanistan after the Bonn Agreement", Journal of Strategic Research of Politics, Vol. 44, No 14, pp. 71-101, Available at: https://qpss.atu.ac.ir/article_1767 (Accessed on: 15/5/2023), [in Persian]. Collins, Joseph J. (2019), Understanding War in Afghanistan, Translated by A. R. Danish, Irfan Publications Institute, [in Persian]. Deheshyar, Hossein (2010a), “Barack Obama's Counterinsurgency Strategy in Afghanistan”, Journal of Political and International Approaches, pp. 9-32, Available at: http://ensani.ir/- file/download/article/20121210093932-9565-30.pdf, (Accessed on: 16/5/2023), [in Persian]. Deheshyar, Hossein (2010b), “Afghanistan: Strategic Ambiguity and America's Failure”, Political and Economic Ettelaat, No. 9, pp.94-107, Available at: http://ensani.ir/file/download/article-/20120329111721-2110-6.pdf, (Accessed on: 16/5/2023), [in Persian]. Ehrnreich, Rosa (2005), “Failed States, or the State as Failure”, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 1159-1196, Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5340andcontext=uclrev, (Accessed on: 16/5/2023). Esmaili, Bashir and Qasim Rezaei (2010), “Reflection on Afghanistan's Transition to Democracy”, Political and International Research, No. 5, pp. 115-134, Available at: http://ensani.ir- /file/download/article/20120325151504-1035-40.pdf, (Accessed on: 16/5/2023), [in Persian]. Esmat, Abdul Razaq (2015), Review of America’s Foreign Policy in Afghanistan, Herat: Ahrari Publications, [in Persian]. Farahmand, Mohiuddin (2020), Globalization in Afghanistan, Kabul: Amiri Publications, [in Persian]. Farmali, Mohammad Wais (2018), The Role of Great Powers in Afghanistan's Foreign Policy Over the Next Decade, Kabul: Peace Publish Center, [in Persian]. Farzanepour, Hossein and Nasir Yosefzehy (2017), “The Historical Application of Elite Theory and the Pathology of the Role of Agents in the Fragility of Afghan States”, Islamic World Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 95-122, Available at: https://priw.ir/article-1-364-fa.html, (Accessed on: 16/5/2023), [in Persian]. Fasihi, Abulfazl (2014), State-Building (The Role of Transnational Factors in the Formation of the State in Afghanistan (1800-2010)), Kabul: Amiri Publications, [in Persian]. Fatemi Nejad, Seyed Aahmad (2020), “Transferring to the East: The Path for ISIS Survival as a Terrorist Organization”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp.187-208, (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2019. 284004.449848), [in Persian]. Fatemi Nejad, Seyed Aahmad and Seyed Mojtaba Alawi (2023), “Explaining Afghanistan's National Security in the Shadow of the US-Iran Conflict (2001-2021)”, The Iranian Research letter of International Politics, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 247-270, (doi:10.22067/irlip.2022.72753.1162), [in Persian]. Fatemi Nejad, Seyed Ahmad and Alireza Mohammadzadeh (2018), “Studying the Status of the New Afghanistan among Regional Security Complexes: from Central Asia to South Asia”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 399-416, (doi: 10.22059/JCEP.2019.216523.449668), [in Persian]. Fazilyar, Fazelrahman (2016), International Community and Nation-State Building in Afghanistan (2001-2015), Kabul: Saadat, [in Persian]. Hashemi, Mohammad Sami (2015), US Foreign Policy in Post-Taliban Afghanistan, Kabul: Saeed Publications, [in Persian]. Hosni Bamik, Mohammad Kazem (2013), Foreign Policy of Post-Taliban Afghanistan, Kabul: Refah, [in Persian]. Hossein Khani, Elham (2011), Afghanistan's Security and the Issue of Taliban Regaining Power, Specialized Quarterly Journal of Political Science, Vol. 00, No. 16, pp. 205-240, Available at: https://www.sid.ir/paper/468745/fa, (Accessed on: 16/5/2023), [in Persian]. Independent Persian (2021), “USA: The Doha Agreement Did Not Play a Role in the Fall of the Previous Government of Afghanistan”, Available at: https://www.independentpersian.com/node/201211, (Accessed on: 27/8/2022), [in Persian]. Jackson, Robert H (1987), “Quasi-States, Dual Regimes, and Neoclassical Theory: International Jurisprudence and the Third World”, International Organization, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 519-549, Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706757, (Accessed on: 17/5/2023). Jones, Seth G (2008), “The Rise of Afghanistan’s Insurgency; State Failure and Jihad”, International Security, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 7-40, Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30129790, (Accessed on: 17/5/2023). Krampe, Florian (2013), The Liberal Trap-Peacemaking and Peacebuilding in Afghanistan After 9/11, in: Mediation and Liberal Peacebuilding: Peace from the Ashes of War? Mikael Eriksson, Roland Kostic (ed.), pp.57-75, Routledge. Moazi, Ali and Saeed Wasoqi (2018), “The Ratio of Security and Development in the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, World Politics Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 27-54, (doi: 10.22124/WP.2018.3086), [in Persian]. Moshirzadeh, Homeira and Mahdi Arefi, (2022), “Foreign Policy Shift in Afghanistan during Ashraf Ghani’s Presidency: A Cognitive Approach”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 14, No. 29, pp. 319-345, [in Persian]. Mutmaeen, Nazar Mohammad (2019), 11 Rounds of Direct Negotiations Between the US and the Taliban, Peshawar: Qalam, [in Pashto]. Nasri, Qadir (2011), “Theoretical Reflection on the Findings and Difficulties of Barry Buzan in the Investigation of Security”, Strategic Studies Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 54, pp. 105-134, Available at: https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_1297 (Accessed on: 18/5/2023), [in Persian]. Noori, Obaid Khan (2015), Democracy in Afghanistan, Kabul: Center for Strategic Studies-MOFA. Rafi, Hossein and Mohsen Bakhtiari Jami (2015), “Peace Challenges in Afghanistan”, Journal of Central Asia and the Caucasus Studies, Vol. 20, No. 88, pp. 33-58, Available at: http://ca.ipisjournals.ir/article_17891.html. [in Persian]. Saadati, Asadullah (2019), Transition to Democracy in Afghanistan and the Role of the European Union, Kabul: Ibn Sina Publications, [in Persian]. Safai, Najibullah (2020), "Peace Theory and How the Negotiations Process", in Regional and International Consensus for Peace, Journal of Storai, No. 1, pp. 19-14, Available at: https://www.- storai.mfa.af/fifth/, (Accessed on: 19/5/2023), [in Persian]. Sajjadi, Abdul Qaium (2018), Foreign Policy of Afghanistan, Kabul: Khatam-ul-Nabiyin (PBUH) University, [in Persian]. Samimi, Seyed Musa (2017), Autopsy of Afghanistan Crisis, Kabul: Mediothek Institute, [in Persian]. Storai (2020), "Regional and International Consensus for Peace", Journal of Storai, No. 1, pp. 1-77, Available at: https://www.storai.mfa.af/fifth/, (Accessed on: 16/5/2023), [in Persian]. Tamanna, Faramarz (2008), American Foreign Policy in Afghanistan, Tehran: Strategic Studies Research Institute, [in Persian]. Tamanna, Faramarz (2014), Afghanistan's Foreign Policy in the Sphere of Regional Cooperation, Kabul: Center for Strategic Studies-MOFA, [in Persian]. Tamanna, Faramarz (2020a), Afghanistan's Foreign Policy (Dynamism, Scope, Actions), Second Edition, Kabul: Amiri, [in Persian]. Tamanna, Faramarz (2020b), The Dilemma of Peace and Security in Afghanistan, Kabul: Amiri, [in Persian]. Tian, Nan (2021), “20 Years of US Military Aid to Afghanistan”, 22 September. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/commentary/topical-backgrounder/2021/20-years-us-military-aid-afghanistan. Wataniar, Mohammad Nasser (2017), Foreign Policy of Post-Taliban Afghanistan, Kabul: Parand [in Persian]. Yousefi, Hayatullah (2007), “Afghanistan, Political System and Democracy”, Journal of Marefat, No. 115, pp. 127-150, Available at: https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/charge/chargeresultar- ticle?articleid=128347andorderid=4348840, (Accessed on: 16/5/2023), [in Persian]. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 398 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 196 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب