پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,116,256 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,220,708 |
محرک‌ها و موانع حمایت بوروکراتهای سطح خیابان از نوآوری خطمشی؛ مطالعه موردی اجرای بودجه‌ریزی مبتنی بر عملکرد در ایران | ||
| سیاستگذاری عمومی | ||
| دوره 10، شماره 1، 1403، صفحه 93-106 اصل مقاله (1.85 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jppolicy.2024.97823 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| اعظم میرزمانی* 1؛ علی نقی امیری2؛ حمیدرضا یزدانی3؛ مرضیه یمانی4 | ||
| 1دانشیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استاد تمام گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه رهبری و سرمایه گذاری، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، ایران | ||
| 4دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| یکی از چالش های دولت های معاصر، رویارویی با مشکلات پیچیده و یکی از بهترین راهکارهای مواجه با آنها، نوآوری خطمشی است. هدف از تحقیق حاضر، بررسی محرک ها و موانع فردی حمایت از نوآوری خط مشی توسط بوروکرات های سطح خیابان است. از این رو اجرای خطمشی بودجه ریزی مبتنی بر عملکرد در ایران به صورت موردی و با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون مطالعه شد. این خط مشی یک نوآوری برای حل مشکل بغرنج ناکارامدی نظام بودجه‌ریزی در بخش عمومی بود. یافته ها نشان داد که بوروکرات های سطح خیابان به دلیل حرفه ای گرایی، مقابله و بیگانگی از خط مشی در مقابل اجرای خط مشی های جدید مقاومت میکنند و تشویق کارکنان، حمایت مدیران از نوآوری، نظارت دقیق بر انجام کار و دادن بازخورد و توانمندسازی کارکنان برای انجام فعالیت ها و اقدامات جدید، محرک‌های حمایت آنها از اجرایی‌شدن خط مشی های جدید هستند. پیشنهاد میشود در هر ابتکار نوآورانه برای رویاروی با مشکلات پیچیده؛ نیازها، ارزش‌ها، منافع کارکنان و توانمندسازی آنها برای اجرای خط مشی های جدید و جلب حمایت کامل مدیران از نوآوری خطمشی در کانون توجه خط مشی گذاران بخش عمومی قرار گیرد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بخش عمومی؛ خطمشی عمومی؛ نوآوری خطمشی؛ بوروکرات سطح خیابان؛ مشکلات بغرنج | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Drivers and Obstacles Support of Street Level Bureaucrats From Policy Innovation; A Case Study of Implementation of Performance-based Budgeting in Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Azam Mirzamani1؛ Ali Naqi Amiri2؛ Hamidreza Yazdani3؛ Marziyeh Yamani4 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Farabi Colleges, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Full Professor of Public Administration Department, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Farabi Colleges, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Leadership and Investment, Faculties of Management, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Doctoral Student of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Farabi Colleges, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| One of the challenges of contemporary governments is to face wicked problems and one of the best solutions to face them is policy innovation. The purpose of the current research was to investigate the individual drivers and barriers to support policy innovation by street-level bureaucrats.Therefore, the implementation of the performance-based budgeting policy in Iran was studied using thematic analysis method. This policy was an innovation to solve the wicked problem of the inefficiency of the budgeting system in the public sector.The findings showed that street-level bureaucrats resist the implementation of new policies due to their professionalism, confrontation and alienation from the policy, and encourage employees, support managers for innovation,closely monitor work performance and give feedback, and empowering employees to perform new activities and actions are the drivers of their support for the implementation of new policies. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Public Sector, Public Policy, Policy Innovation, Street Level Bureaucrat, Wicked Problems | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Babajani, J. (2008). Accounting and Accountability in the Public Sector (Collection of Articles). Tehran, Iran:Termeh. .[in Persian]
Bason, C. (2014). Design for Policy.London: ImprintRoutledge.
Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006).Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitive Research in Psychology , 3 (2), 77-101.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 223-261).
Boyatzis ,R . E . (1998). Transforming qualitative information : Thematic analysis and code development. New York:Sage.
Crowley, K., & Head, B. W. (2017). The enduring challenge of ‘wicked problems’: revisiting Rittel and Webber. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 539–547.
Daley, D. M., & Garand, J. C. (2005). Horizontal Diffusion, Vertical Diffusion, and Internal Pressure in State Environmental Policymaking, 1989-1998. American Politics Research, 33(5), 615–644.
Danai Fard, H., Alwani, S.M. & Adel, A. (2016). Qualitative research methodology in management: a comprehensive approach. Tehran, Iran: Negah Danesh.[in Persian]
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers. 17(3), 215–236.
Duncan, R.B. (1976). ‘The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation’. In: R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy and D. P. Slevin (eds), The Management of Organizational Design: Strategy Implementation, 1, pp. 167–188. North-Holland, New York.
Evans, B., & Cheng, S.M. (2020) .Canadian government policy innovation labs: An experimental turn in policy work?.Canadian public administration, 64(4), 587–610.
Fariborz, A. (1997). Applied budgeting in Iran . Tehran, Iran: Honar Cooperative Company.[in Persian].
Finch,M. A. (2012). Precursors to Policy Innovation: How Tennessee Entered Race to the Top. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(5), 576–592
Fry,V.C.(2019). Pay for Success: Diffusion of Policy Innovation for Social and Economic Stability. Public Administration Review, 79(5), 784–790.
Heap, S.H., & Talavera, (2021). Policy innovation through noise in implementation: Best to be grey (or silver) on Friday, in Halifax.Scottish Jornal of Political Economy , 70(1), 19–37.
Hill, M., & Hupe, P.( 2022). Implementing Public Policy. New York:Sage .
Jordan, M., Hackbart, M. (2005). The Goals and Implementation Success of State Performance Based Budgeting. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accouting and Financial Management, 17(4), 471-487.
Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: the politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 715-734.
Khanifar, H , Muslimi, N. (2016). Principles and basics of qualitative research methods: approach and Tehran, Iran: Negah Danesh.[in Persian]
Krause, R.M. (2011). Policy innovation, Intergovermental Relations And The Adoption Of Climate Protection InitiativesBy U.S.Cities, 33(1), 45–60.
Lindquist, E.A , & Buttazzoni, M. (2021) The ecology of open innovation units: adhocracy and competing values in public service systems, Policy Design and Practice, 4:(2),212-227.
Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-Level Bureaucracy and the Analysis of Urban Reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6(4), 391–409.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Mallinson, D.J. (2020). Policy Innovation Adoption Across the Diffusion Life Course. Policy Studies Journal, (), –.
Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Qadiri Asl, B. (1987). Generalities of Economics .Tehran Sepehr Publications.[in Persian].
Rittel, H.W.J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy sciences ,4 (2):69-155.
Roberts, N. & King, P. (1988). Policy Entrepreneurs: Catalysts for Innovative Public Policy.Academy of Management Proceedings, 1988(1), 313–317.
Robinson, M. & Brumby, J. (2005). Does Performance Budgeting Work?An Analytical Review of the Empirical Literature. Washington, D.C. C., United States of America : International Monetary Fund.Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.
Sadabadi, A.A., & Mirzamani, A.(2021). The sustainable development goals and leadership in public sector: a case study of social innovation in the disability sector of Iran. The European Journal of Social Science Research,36(2),286-300.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012).“Research Methods for Business Students” 6 th edition, Pearson Education Limited p.288.
Scholten, P. (2010). Leadership in Policy Innovation: A Conceptual Map. Nature and Culture, 5(1), 31–48.
Scholten, P., & Timmermans, A. (2010). Setting the Immigrant Policy Agenda: Expertise and Politics in the Netherlands, France and the United Kingdom. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 12(5), 527–544.
Sorg ,J.D.(1983). A typology of impelementation behaviors of street-level bureaucarts. the Journal of Policy Studies Review, 2( 3), 391-406.
Sørensen,E., & Waldor,S.B. (2014). Collaborative policy innovation:Problems and potential. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 19(3) , article 2.
Tehran state Management and Planning Organization Representing From the country's program and budget organization ,( 2017). Establishing a performance-based budgeting system in provincial general offices across the country.[in Persian].
Torfing, Jacob (2018). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument. Public Management Review, (), 1–11.
Torfing, J. 2016. Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Tummers, L. (2011). Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement new policies: a policy alienation framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(3), 555–581
Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy,and the Importance of Discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547.
Tummers, L. (2012). Policy Alienation of Public Professionals: The Construct and its Measurement Public Administration Review, 72( 4), 516-525.
Zaltman,G., & Duncan,R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and Organizations. Wiley, New York.
Zhu, L. (2016). Voices from the Frontline: Network Participation and Local Support for National Policy Reforms.the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, (), 1-17. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 153 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 161 |
||