پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,573 |
| تعداد مقالات | 71,032 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 125,502,583 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 98,766,754 |
مکتب ژئوپلیتیک روسی: معمای پایدار آسیب‌پذیری و گسترش‌گرایی | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 1، شهریور 1403، صفحه 309-333 اصل مقاله (950.11 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2024.374703.450211 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| جهانگیر کرمی* | ||
| دانشیار، گروه مطالعات روسیه، دانشکده مطالعات جهان، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در روسیۀ سه سدۀ گذشته، اندیشه‌پردازی برای روند ژئوپلیتیک روسی، به شکل یک نیاز اساسی درآمده و اندیشه‌های گوناگونی را دامن زده است. چالش اصلی این پژوهش دست‌یابی به درک یک دانش ویژۀ روسی، در حوزۀ مسائل راهبردی و جغرافیایی این کشور است. از این‌رو، پرسش این نوشتار آن است که: چگونه می‌توان از یک مکتب ژئوپلیتیک روسی سخن‌گفت و مفهوم‌های بنیادین آن چگونه قابل درک هستند؟ ادعای نگارنده آن است که با وجود پراکندگی اندیشه‌ها می‌توان حلقۀ وصل و نقطۀ مشترک آنها را در مفهوم‌های: نادسترسی دریایی، سرزمینی بودن، آسیب‌پذیری دفاعی، ژئواستراتژی عمق راهبردی، منطقه حائل و گسترش‌گرایی پیاپی بیان کرد. در میان آنها دو مقولۀ: آسیب‌پذیری جغرافیایی و گسترش‌گرایی قلمروی، رهنمود‌های مرکزی پنداشته می‌شوند. برای بررسی این فرضیه از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی مضمون‌ها و متغیرهای موجود در متن‌های مربوط‌به اندیشه ژئوپلیتیک در روسیه بهره گرفته میشود. دستاورد این مقاله آن است که تکیه بر دو مفهوم اساسی آسیب‌پذیری و گسترش‌گرایی، ریشۀ بسیاری از مشکلات مربوط به توسعه و سیاست خارجی را در روسیۀ امروز نشان می‌دهد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ژئوپلیتیک؛ آسیب‌پذیری؛ گسترش‌گرایی؛ غرب؛ اوراسیا؛ روسیه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Russian Geopolitical School: Permanent Dilemma of Vulnerability and Expansionism | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Jahangir Karami | ||
| Associate Professor, Department of Russian Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: Gopolitics, like any other science, has general rules and specific patterns and this issue has provided the feasibility of the school of geopolitics in the field of global thought. In Russian scientific circles, due to the country's role in the balance of international power in the last three centuries, thinking about Russian geopolitics has become a vital necessitybut the important issue in this field has been the dispersion of opinions and the instability of propositions over time and finding a common point of view for the formulation of the special Russian school in this field. Research questions: The main question raised in this research is how to talk about the Russian geopolitical school and understand its central concepts? Research hypothesis: The author's hypothesis is that despite the dispersion of ideas, their common link and point of commonality can be expressed in the concepts such as maritime inaccessibility, territorial vulnerabilities, the problem of strategic depth, the buffer zone and expansionism as the Russian geopolitical school. Among these, two categories of geographical vulnerability and territorial expansion of the central sign are taken into consideration. Methodology and theoretical framework: To examine the hypothesis of the article, I have used the method of qualitative and thematic content analysis of texts related to Russian geopolitical thought. In this regard, various texts have been written in the last three centuries. Although more distant texts are difficult to access, many new texts refer to the main themes of those writings. To review these texts, the author tried to select the most important ones and then by reviewing them, select the most important thinkers in the field of Russian geopolitical studies. The main basis for selecting indicators such as the age of scientist, the importance of thought, thematic coherence and the reputation of the school of thought was created. In the meantime, of course, some approaches such as Eurasian, Atlantic and Eastern approaches have been less difficultbut this issue regarding other approaches has not been an easy task due to existing differences of opinion. Results and discussion: The main factor that has caused the Russian school of geopolitics to remain limited is that geopolitical ideas in this country, unlike other great powers, are very diverse and controversial and this makes it very difficult to understand. The causes of this diversity can be found in important cases such as territorial expansion and the complexity of factors affecting geopolitics, the diversity and expansion of threats and their types, the issue of empire and the crisis of national identity, the instability of borders and the constant intellectual and identity conflict against the West. From the point of view of Russian geopolitical thinkers, this country is very vast and has many neighbors and has a common land border with fourteen countries and faces various threats in the western, southern and eastern directions. Russia has a territorial connection with the two continents of Europe and Asia and has a close maritime neighborhood with the American continent. Russia has a serious relationship with three global geostrategic regions including Euro-Atlantic, Middle East and East Asia, and therefore, from their point of view, this issue is considered very vital. From the point of view of many thinkers of Russian geopolitical knowledge, to overcome the problems and threats caused by the lack of maritime access and defense vulnerability, this country should put strategies such as strategic depth, buffer zone and territorial expansion on the agenda and this is a fact that has shaped its practical policy in post-Mongol Russia from the 15th century to the present day. The collection of these geopolitical propositions in recent centuries have led to two basic issues in Russia: on the one hand, the need for a powerful government and on the other hand, the creation of an imperial state. However, as a result of the powerful and autocratic government, it has faced the development crisisand the inevitable state of the empire, it has also suffered an identity crisis and both have caused instability in the directions of domestic and foreign policy. Conclusion: Based on the findings of this article and despite some conflicts, we can talk about the Russian geopolitical school whose main concepts and components are common among different thinkers in this country from the 18th century to the present day. It seems that the reason for the lack of recognition is a kind of denial, neglect, cultural and ideological denial of Russia in the past two centuries by Western academic circles and the lack of translation of Russian texts in Iran, except for some articles on Eurasian approach. Therefore, despite the dispersion of views in the field of Russian geographical studies, concepts such as maritime inaccessibility, territorial inaccessibility, defense vulnerability, lack of strategic depth, the necessity of a buffer zone, and expansionist politics are the common variables of these views and geographical vulnerability, especially in the western regions, and territorial expansion in the surrounding environment are the focal points of this geopolitical school. The findings of the article showed that the realities of Russian geography and the concerns of the thinkers of geographical studies have provided important possibilities for the presentation of the Russian geopolitical school along with its other western counterparts and without it, a deep understanding of the country's foreign policy becomes difficult. With its help, important progress can be made for the countries around Russia and especially Iran, which has been one of its victims in a wide area from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Geopolitics, Vulnerability, Expansionism, West, Eurasia, Russia | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alekseeva, Irina (1999), Geopolitical Thought in Russia, Political Problems of International Relations and Global Development, Academic Degree: Candidate of Political Sciences, Place of Thesis Defense: St. Petersburg, HAC specialty code: 23.00.04, Available at: https://cheloveknauka.com/geopoliticheskaya-mysl-v-rossii, (Accessed on: 20/11/2022), [in Russian]. Belouet, Brian (2007), Global Geostrategy, Translated by Mahbobeh Bayat, Tehran, Strategic Studies Institute, [in Persian]. Cohen, Saul Bernard (2008), Geopolitics of the World System, Translated by Abbas Kardan, Tehran, Abrar Moaser of Tehran Institute, [in Persian]. Doraj, Hamid and Seyed Mohammad Tabatabai (2018), Geopolitical Role of Ukraine in the Modern Confrontation Between America and Russia, International Quarterly of Geopolitics, Vol. 15, No. 54, pp.1-30, (doi: 20.1001.1.17354331.1398.15.54.1.4), [in Persian]. Dugin, Alexander (1997), Fundamentals of Geopolitics: Russia's Geopolitical Future, Moscow: Arktogeya Center, [in Russian]. Dugin, Alexander (2012), the Fourth Theory of Politics; Russia and Ideas of the 21st Century, Translated by Mahnaz Nowrozi, Tehran: Salman and Azadeh Publication, [in Persian]. Ezzati, Ezzatolah (2014), Geopolitics, Tehran, SAMT Publication, [in Persian]. Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza (2016), Humanistic Geopolitics, International Quarterly of Geopolitics, Vol. 3, No. 9. pp. 1-4, [in Persian]. Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza (2016), Principles and Concepts of Geopolitics, Mashhad, Papli Publication, [in Persian]. Kaplan, Robert (2019), the Revenge of Geography, Translated by Mohammad Hasan Khazri and Mehbobeh Nik Farjam, Entekhab Publication, [in Persian]. Karami, Jahangir (1401), Leviathan Security Strategy: Reflecting the Geopolitical Environment in Russian Governance Thought, International Quarterly of Geopolitics, Vol. 18, No. 67, pp. 31-69, (doi: 20.1001.1.17354331.1401.18.67.2.2), [in Persian]. Karimipour, Davood (2023), Geoeconomic Approach in Foreign Relations Analysis; Study of Russia's Relations with Western European Countries, International Quarterly of Geopolitics, Vol. 19, No. 69, pp. 207-244, (doi: 20.1001.1.17354331.1402.19.69.8.9), [in Persian]. Kolosov, Vladimir, Maria Zotova and Nikita Turov (2022) "Geopolitics and Political Geography in Russia: Global Context and National Characteristics", Reg Res Russ, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 80-95, (doi: 10.1134/S2079970522020046). Koolaee, Elaheh and Afifeh Abedi (2017), Geopolitical Components of Russia's Foreign Policy, International Quarterly of Geopolitics, Vol. 14, No. 49, pp. 1-25, (doi: 20.1001.1.17354331.1397.14.49.1.7). [in Persian]. Koolaee, Elaheh (2010), Politics and Government in Central Eurasia, Tehran, SAMT, [in Persian]. Laruel, Marlene (2009), Russian Eurasianism, Translated by Mohammad Hossein Dehghanian, Tehran, Abrar Moaser Publication, [in Persian]. Lebedeva, M. M. and M. V. Kharkevich, (2016), the Thory of International Relations in the Mirror of Modern Russian Research, Bulletin of MGIMO University, Vol. 5, No. 50, pp. 7-19, (doi: 10.24833/2071-8160-2016-5-50-7 -19). Marshall, Tim (2019), Prisoners of Geography, translated by Marjan Rezaei, Tehran, Markaz Publication, [in Persian]. Mauldin, John (2022), 10 Maps That Explain Russia's Strategy, Forbes, Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2016/02/26/10-maps-that-explain-russias-strategy, (Accessed on: 18/8/2024). Mojtahedzadeh, Pirouz (2016), Philosophy and Function of Geopolitics, Tehran, SAMT Publication, [in Persian]. Mir Heidar, Dorreh and Fatemeh Mir Ahmadi (2017), The Course of Thought in Traditional and Modern Political Geography (1897 to the Late 1980s), Tehran, University of Tehran Press, [in Persian]. Nartov, Nikolai (2007), Geopolitics: a Textbook for University Students Studying in the Specialties State and Municipal Management”, “International Relations”, “Regional Studies, Staroverov University Press. Okunev, Igor (2009), Russian Geopolitical Scholars and Schools of Thought, Interview, Available at: https://exploringgeopolitics.org/interview_okunev_igor_russian_geopolitics, (Accessed on: 27/6/2023). Putin, Vladimir (2021), On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians, Available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181, (Accessed on: 20/6/2023). Shakibi, Ghand (2017), Russia and the Politics of Occidentalism, Tehran, Iras Publication, [in Persian]. Snyder, Timothy (2018), the Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America, Translated by Hadi Shahi, Tehran, Ketab Parse Publication, [in Persian]. Soloviev, Eduard (2010), Geopolitics in Russia as a Scientific Discipline: Problems and Trends of Evolution, Perspectives, Electronic Journal, Available at: https://www.perspektivy.info/rus/rus_civ/geopolitika_v_rossii_kak_nauchnaja_disciplina_problemy_i_tendencii_evolucii_2010-12-01.htm. (Accessed on: 23/7/2023), [in Russian]. Solovyev, Eduard (2004, March) "Geopolitics in Russia, Science or Vocation?" Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 85-96, (doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2003.12.009). Tismanano, Vladimir and Keith Langdon (2020), Putin's Totalitarian Democracy: Ideology, Myth and Violence in the Twenthy First Century, Translated by Sudabah Kaysari, Tehran, Ketab Parse Publication, [in Persian]. Tsygankov, Andrey (2014), Russian Theory of International Relations: What it should Be, Comparative Politics, Vol. 2, No. 15, pp. 65-84, (doi: 10.18611/2221-3279-2014-5-2), [in Russian]. Tsygankov, Andrey (2022), Russian Realism, Defending 'Derzhava' in International Relations, London, Routledge. Zareei, Bahadur and Others (2019), Explanation of Geopolitical Thinking in Russian Foreign Policy, Human Geography Research, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 1093-1110 (doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2019.267413.1007797), [in Persian]. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 353 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 239 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب